Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Exploring Tϒϒ tetraquark candidates in a coupled-channels formalism

P. G. Ortega1,2,*, D. R. Entem1,2,†, F. Fernández2,‡, and J. Segovia3,§

  • *Contact author: pgortega@usal.es
  • Contact author: entem@usal.es
  • Contact author: fdz@usal.es
  • §Contact author: jsegovia@upo.es

Phys. Rev. D 113, 114025 – Published 15 June, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/b3qx-krpt

Abstract

We investigate the spectrum of Tϒϒ tetraquark candidates within a coupled-channel framework. The analysis includes all L2 combinations of ϒ(1S), ϒ(2S), ηb(1S), and ηb(2S) in the JP=0±,1±,2± sectors. The meson-meson interaction is derived from an underlying constituent quark model through the resonating group method, and the properties of the states are obtained from poles of the scattering matrix. We find a rich spectrum of resonant, and virtual, states distributed between the ηb(1S)ηb(1S) and ϒ(2S)ϒ(2S) thresholds. The pattern of poles exhibits approximate heavy-quark spin symmetry multiplets. Several states are dominated by a single channel and can be associated with threshold-driven structures, while higher-mass resonances show sizable mixing among channels involving radially excited bottomonia. The predicted widths range from tens to several hundred MeV. Branching ratios indicate that many states couple predominantly to final states with at least one excited bottomonium, whereas only a subset of the spectrum is expected to be visible in the ηb(1S)ηb(1S), ηb(1S)ϒ(1S) and ϒ(1S)ϒ(1S) channels. These results provide quantitative guidance for experimental searches of fully heavy tetraquarks and offer a test of coupled-channel dynamics and heavy-quark spin symmetry in the bbb¯b¯ sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (95)

  1. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  2. M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  3. G. Zweig, Reports No. 8182/TH.401, No. 8419/TH.412, CERN, 1964.
  4. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 152001 (2021).
  5. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
  6. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076201 (2017).
  7. F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018).
  8. Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
  9. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Symmetry 12, 1869 (2020).
  10. X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 125201 (2021).
  11. H.-X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094003 (2022).
  12. X. Cao, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 18, 44600 (2023).
  13. M. Mai, U.-G. Meißner, and C. Urbach, Phys. Rep. 1001, 1 (2023).
  14. L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  15. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  16. F.-K. Guo, H. Peng, J.-J. Xie, and X. Zhou, arXiv:2203.07141.
  17. P. G. Ortega and D. R. Entem, Symmetry 13, 279 (2021).
  18. H. Huang, C. Deng, X. Liu, Y. Tan, and J. Ping, Symmetry 15, 1298 (2023).
  19. R. F. Lebed, Proc. Sci. FPCP2023 (2023) 028 [arXiv:2308.00781].
  20. B.-S. Zou, Sci. Bull. 66, 1258 (2021).
  21. M.-L. Du, V. Baru, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and Q. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2021) 157.
  22. M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rep. 1108, 1 (2025).
  23. D. Johnson, I. Polyakov, T. Skwarnicki, and M. Wang, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74, 583 (2024).
  24. D. R. Entem, F. Fernández, P. G. Ortega, and J. Segovia, arXiv:2504.07897.
  25. C. Hanhart, arXiv:2504.06043.
  26. X. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Gao, Rev. Mod. Phys. 98, 021001 (2026).
  27. Z.-G. Wang, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 21, 016300 (2026).
  28. A. Francis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 140, 104143 (2025).
  29. J.-H. Chen, J. Chen, F.-K. Guo, Y.-G. Ma, C.-P. Shen, Q.-Y. Shou, Q. Shou, Q. Wang, J.-J. Wu, and B.-S. Zou, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 36, 55 (2025).
  30. N. Hüsken, E. S. Norella, and I. Polyakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 40, 2530002 (2025).
  31. LHCb Collaboration, Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020).
  32. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 111901 (2024).
  33. , Observation of an excess of di-charmonium events in the four-muon final state with the ATLAS detector, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2022-040, 2022.
  34. LHCb Collaboration, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1530022 (2015).
  35. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. Instrum. 3, S08004 (2008).
  36. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. Instrum. 3, S08003 (2008).
  37. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), arXiv:1808.08865.
  38. A. V. Berezhnoy, A. V. Luchinsky, and A. A. Novoselov, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034004 (2012).
  39. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 202001 (2017).
  40. J. Wu, Y.-R. Liu, K. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094015 (2018).
  41. M. N. Anwar, J. Ferretti, F.-K. Guo, E. Santopinto, and B.-S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 647 (2018).
  42. V. R. Debastiani and F. S. Navarra, Chin. Phys. C 43, 013105 (2019).
  43. E. Eichten and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 202002 (2017).
  44. C. Deng, H. Chen, and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014001 (2021).
  45. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014006 (2021).
  46. Z. Asadi and G. R. Boroun, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014006 (2022).
  47. W.-L. Wu, Y.-K. Chen, Y. Ma, L. Meng, and S.-L. Zhu, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 4, 100184 (2025).
  48. W. Chen, H. Liu, S. Shi, and S.-H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114017 (2017).
  49. Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 432 (2017).
  50. Z.-G. Wang and Z.-Y. Di, Acta Phys. Pol. B 50, 1335 (2019).
  51. Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 393 (2019).
  52. J.-R. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014018 (2021).
  53. T. Mehen, Phys. Rev. D 91, 034019 (2015).
  54. F.-K. Guo, C. Hidalgo-Duque, J. Nieves, and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094018 (2018).
  55. C. Hughes, E. Eichten, and C. T. H. Davies, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054505 (2018).
  56. P. Junnarkar and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034507 (2020).
  57. N. Barnea, J. Vijande, and A. Valcarce, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054004 (2006).
  58. R. J. Lloyd and J. P. Vary, Phys. Rev. D 87, 014009 (2013).
  59. Y. Bai, S. Lu, and J. Osborne, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134930 (2019).
  60. J.-M. Richard, A. Valcarce, and J. Vijande, Phys. Rev. D 95, 054019 (2017).
  61. M. A. Bedolla, J. Ferretti, C. D. Roberts, and E. Santopinto, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1004 (2020).
  62. M.-S. Liu, Q.-F. Lü, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 100, 016006 (2019).
  63. M. C. Gordillo, F. De Soto, and J. Segovia, Phys. Rev. D 102, 114007 (2020).
  64. A. Esposito and A. D. Polosa, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 782 (2018).
  65. M.-S. liu, F.-X. Liu, X.-H. Zhong, and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 109, 076017 (2024).
  66. I. Belov, A. Giachino, and E. Santopinto, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 093.
  67. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094023 (2023).
  68. J. Vijande, F. Fernandez, and A. Valcarce, J. Phys. G 31, 481 (2005).
  69. F. Fernandez, A. Valcarce, U. Straub, and A. Faessler, J. Phys. G 19, 2013 (1993).
  70. A. Valcarce, F. Fernandez, A. Buchmann, and A. Faessler, Phys. Rev. C 50, 2246 (1994).
  71. A. Valcarce, F. Fernandez, P. Gonzalez, and V. Vento, Phys. Lett. B 367, 35 (1996).
  72. J. Vijande, A. Valcarce, and K. Tsushima, Phys. Rev. D 74, 054018 (2006).
  73. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Lett. B 662, 33 (2008).
  74. J. Segovia, A. M. Yasser, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114033 (2008).
  75. J. Segovia, A. M. Yasser, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 80, 054017 (2009).
  76. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 81, 054023 (2010).
  77. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114018 (2011).
  78. J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 91, 094020 (2015).
  79. G. Yang and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 95, 014010 (2017).
  80. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 94, 114018 (2016).
  81. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074037 (2016).
  82. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034010 (2017).
  83. G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Few-Body Syst. 59, 113 (2018).
  84. G. Yang and J. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034023 (2018).
  85. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 78 (2019).
  86. P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 223 (2020).
  87. G. S. Bali, Phys. Rep. 343, 1 (2001).
  88. G. S. Bali, H. Neff, T. Duessel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling (SESAM Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 71, 114513 (2005).
  89. A. Faessler, G. Lubeck, and K. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. D 26, 3280 (1982).
  90. D. R. Entem and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. C 73, 045214 (2006).
  91. J. Segovia, P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074027 (2016).
  92. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).
  93. J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 52, 1083 (1937).
  94. P. G. Ortega, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, J. Phys. G 40, 065107 (2013).
  95. P. A. Grassi, B. A. Kniehl, and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 389 (2001).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation