Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Thermally versus dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production

Greger Torgrimsson*

  • Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut, Abbe Center of Photonics, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D-07743 Jena, Germany and Helmholtz Institute Jena, Fröbelstieg 3, D-07743 Jena, Germany

  • *greger.torgrimsson@uni-jena.de

Phys. Rev. D 99, 096007 – Published 8 May, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.096007

Abstract

We study electron-positron pair production by the combination of a strong, constant electric field and a thermal background. We show that this process is similar to dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production, where the strong field is instead assisted by another coherent field, which is weaker but faster. We treat the interaction with the photons from the thermal background perturbatively, while the interaction with the electric field is nonperturbative (i.e., a Furry picture expansion in α). At O(α2) we have ordinary perturbative Breit-Wheeler pair production assisted nonperturbatively by the electric field. Already at this order we recover the same exponential part of the probability as previous studies, which did not expand in α. This means that we do not have to consider higher orders, so our approach allows us to calculate the preexponential part of the probability, which has not been obtained before in this regime. Although the prefactor is in general subdominant compared to the exponential part, in this case it can be important because it scales as α21 and is therefore much smaller than the prefactor at O(α0) (pure Schwinger pair production). We show that, because of the exponential enhancement, O(α2) still gives the dominant contribution for temperatures above a certain threshold, but, because of the small prefactor, the threshold is higher than what the exponential alone would suggest.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. F. Sauter, Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs, Z. Phys. 69, 742 (1931).
  2. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
  3. J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  4. V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, and V. M. Strakhovenko, Higher-order effects in external field: pair production by a particle, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 14, 572 (1972).
  5. V. I. Ritus, Vacuum polarization correction to elastic electron and muon scattering in an intense field and pair electro- and muoproduction, Nucl. Phys. B44, 236 (1972).
  6. C. Bamber et al., Studies of nonlinear QED in collisions of 46.6-GeV electrons with intense laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D 60, 092004 (1999).
  7. H. Hu, C. Muller, and C. H. Keitel, Complete QED Theory of Multiphoton Trident Pair Production in Strong Laser Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 080401 (2010).
  8. A. Ilderton, Trident Pair Production in Strong Laser Pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020404 (2011).
  9. B. King and H. Ruhl, Trident pair production in a constant crossed field, Phys. Rev. D 88, 013005 (2013).
  10. V. Dinu and G. Torgrimsson, Trident pair production in plane waves: Coherence, exchange, and spacetime inhomogeneity, Phys. Rev. D 97, 036021 (2018).
  11. B. King and A. M. Fedotov, Effect of interference on the trident process in a constant crossed field, Phys. Rev. D 98, 016005 (2018).
  12. F. Mackenroth and A. Di Piazza, Nonlinear trident pair production in an arbitrary plane wave: A focus on the properties of the transition amplitude, Phys. Rev. D 98, 116002 (2018).
  13. G. V. Dunne, H. Gies, and R. Schützhold, Catalysis of Schwinger vacuum pair production, Phys. Rev. D 80, 111301 (2009).
  14. R. Schützhold, H. Gies, and G. Dunne, Dynamically Assisted Schwinger Mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 130404 (2008).
  15. M. Orthaber, F. Hebenstreit, and R. Alkofer, Momentum spectra for dynamically assisted Schwinger pair production, Phys. Lett. B 698, 80 (2011).
  16. A. Otto, D. Seipt, D. Blaschke, B. Kämpfer, and S. A. Smolyansky, Lifting shell structures in the dynamically assisted Schwinger effect in periodic fields, Phys. Lett. B 740, 335 (2015).
  17. M. F. Linder, C. Schneider, J. Sicking, N. Szpak, and R. Schützhold, Pulse shape dependence in the dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect, Phys. Rev. D 92, 085009 (2015).
  18. C. Schneider and R. Schützhold, Prefactor in the dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect, Phys. Rev. D 94, 085015 (2016).
  19. G. Torgrimsson, C. Schneider, J. Oertel, and R. Schützhold, Dynamically assisted Sauter-Schwinger effect—Non-perturbative versus perturbative aspects, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 043.
  20. G. Torgrimsson, C. Schneider, and R. Schützhold, Sauter-Schwinger pair creation dynamically assisted by a plane wave, Phys. Rev. D 97, 096004 (2018).
  21. I. A. Aleksandrov, G. Plunien, and V. M. Shabaev, Dynamically assisted Schwinger effect beyond the spatially-uniform-field approximation, Phys. Rev. D 97, 116001 (2018).
  22. G. Torgrimsson, Perturbative methods for assisted nonperturbative pair production, Phys. Rev. D 99, 096002 (2019).
  23. W. Dittrich, Effective Lagrangians at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2385 (1979).
  24. I. L. Bukhbinder, D. M. Gitman, and V. P Frolov, Density matrix for particle production processes in an external field, Sov. Phys. J. 23, 529 (1980).
  25. P. H. Cox, W. S. Hellman, and A. Yildiz, Finite temperature corrections to field theory: Electron mass and magnetic moment, and vacuum energy, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 154, 211 (1984).
  26. M. Loewe and J. C. Rojas, Thermal effects and the effective action of quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 46, 2689 (1992).
  27. P. Elmfors and B. S. Skagerstam, Electromagnetic fields in a thermal background, Phys. Lett. B 348, 141 (1995); Erratum, 376, 330(E) (1996).
  28. J. Hallin and P. Liljenberg, Fermionic and bosonic pair creation in an external electric field at finite temperature using the functional Schrodinger representation, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1150 (1995).
  29. A. K. Ganguly, J. C. Parikh, and P. K. Kaw, Thermal tunneling of q anti-q pairs in A-A collisions, Phys. Rev. C 51, 2091 (1995).
  30. I. A. Shovkovy, One loop finite temperature effective potential in QED in the worldline approach, Phys. Lett. B 441, 313 (1998).
  31. H. Gies, QED effective action at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 60, 105002 (1999).
  32. H. Gies, QED effective action at finite temperature: Two loop dominance, Phys. Rev. D 61, 085021 (2000).
  33. S. P. Gavrilov, D. M. Gitman, and J. L. Tomazelli, Density matrix of a quantum field in a particle-creating background, Nucl. Phys. B795, 645 (2008).
  34. S. P. Kim and H. K. Lee, Schwinger pair production at finite temperature in scalar QED, Phys. Rev. D 76, 125002 (2007).
  35. S. P. Gavrilov and D. M. Gitman, One-loop energy-momentum tensor in QED with electric-like background, Phys. Rev. D 78, 045017 (2008).
  36. S. P. Kim, H. K. Lee, and Y. Yoon, Schwinger pair production at finite temperature in QED, Phys. Rev. D 79, 045024 (2009).
  37. A. Monin and M. B. Voloshin, Photon-stimulated production of electron-positron pairs in electric field, Phys. Rev. D 81, 025001 (2010).
  38. S. P. Kim, H. K. Lee, and Y. Yoon, Nonperturbative QED effective action at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 82, 025016 (2010).
  39. B. King, H. Gies, and A. Di Piazza, Pair production in a plane wave by thermal background photons, Phys. Rev. D 86, 125007 (2012); Erratum, 87, 069905(E) (2013).
  40. K. Fukushima, Spectral representation of the particle production out of equilibrium—Schwinger mechanism in pulsed electric fields, New J. Phys. 16, 073031 (2014).
  41. A. R. Brown, Schwinger pair production at nonzero temperatures or in compact directions, Phys. Rev. D 98, 036008 (2018).
  42. L. Medina and M. C. Ogilvie, Schwinger pair production at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 95, 056006 (2017).
  43. O. Gould and A. Rajantie, Thermal Schwinger pair production at arbitrary coupling, Phys. Rev. D 96, 076002 (2017).
  44. M. Korwar and A. M. Thalapillil, Finite temperature Schwinger pair production in coexistent electric and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 98, 076016 (2018).
  45. P. Draper, Virtual and thermal Schwinger processes, Phys. Rev. D 98, 125014 (2018).
  46. O. Gould, A. Rajantie, and C. Xie, Worldline sphaleron for thermal Schwinger pair production, Phys. Rev. D 98, 056022 (2018).
  47. X. L. Sheng, R. H. Fang, Q. Wang, and D. H. Rischke, Wigner function and pair production in parallel electric and magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056004 (2019).
  48. O. Gould, S. Mangles, A. Rajantie, S. Rose, and C. Xie, Observing thermal Schwinger pair production, arXiv:1812.04089.
  49. P. Satunin, Breit-Wheeler pair production from worldline instantons, EPJ Web Conf. 191, 02019 (2018).
  50. T. A. Weaver, Reaction rates in a relativistic plasma, Phys. Rev. A 13, 1563 (1976).
  51. E. S. Fradkin, D. M. Gitman, and S. M. Shvartsman, Quantum Electrodynamics with Unstable Vacuum, Springer Series in Nuclear and Particle Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1991), p. 288.
  52. W. Dittrich and H. Gies, Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application, Springer Tracts Mod. Phys. 166, 1 (2000).
  53. F. Hebenstreit, Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous electric fields, arXiv:1106.5965.
  54. F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer, and H. Gies, Schwinger pair production in space and time-dependent electric fields: Relating the Wigner formalism to quantum kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105026 (2010).
  55. C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 2. First quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1762 (1977).
  56. L. Salasnich, Quantum Physics of Light and Matter: Photons, Atoms, and Strongly Correlated Systems, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 2017).
  57. F. Mandl and G. Shaw, Quantum Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation