Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gauge-invariant rotor Hamiltonian from dual variables of 3D U(1) gauge theory

Judah F. Unmuth-Yockey*

  • Department of Physics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA

  • *jfunmuthyockey@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 99, 074502 – Published 9 April, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.074502

Abstract

We present a tensor formulation for free compact electrodynamics in three Euclidean dimensions and use this formulation to construct a quantum Hamiltonian in the continuous-time limit. Gauge-invariance is maintained at every step and ultimately the gauge fields are integrated out, removing all initial gauge freedom. The resulting Hamiltonian can be written as a rotor model. The energy eigenvalues for this Hamiltonian are computed using the tensor renormalization group, and are compared with perturbation theory. We find good agreement between the calculations, demonstrating a smooth passage from the statistical lattice Lagrangian description to the quantum Hamiltonian description.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. M. Levin and C. P. Nave, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120601 (2007).
  2. Z. Y. Xie, J. Chen, M. P. Qin, J. W. Zhu, L. P. Yang, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. B 86, 045139 (2012).
  3. Z. Y. Xie, H. C. Jiang, Q. N. Chen, Z. Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160601 (2009).
  4. Y. Liu, Y. Meurice, M. P. Qin, J. Unmuth-Yockey, T. Xiang, Z. Y. Xie, J. F. Yu, and H. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 88, 056005 (2013).
  5. G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180405 (2015).
  6. R. Sakai, S. Takeda, and Y. Yoshimura, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 063B07 (2017).
  7. L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 2, 263 (1966).
  8. K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971).
  9. A. Denbleyker, Y. Liu, Y. Meurice, M. P. Qin, T. Xiang, Z. Y. Xie, J. F. Yu, and H. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 89, 016008 (2014).
  10. C. Gattringer, D. Gschl, and T. Sulejmanpai, Nucl. Phys. B935, 344 (2018).
  11. C. Marchis and C. Gattringer, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034508 (2018).
  12. H. Zou, Y. Liu, C.-Y. Lai, J. Unmuth-Yockey, L.-P. Yang, A. Bazavov, Z. Y. Xie, T. Xiang, S. Chandrasekharan, S.-W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063603 (2014).
  13. J. Unmuth-Yockey, J. Zhang, P. M. Preiss, L.-P. Yang, S.-W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023603 (2017).
  14. A. Bazavov, Y. Meurice, S.-W. Tsai, J. Unmuth-Yockey, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 92, 076003 (2015).
  15. U.-J. Wiese, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 525, 777 (2013).
  16. R. Savit, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 453 (1980).
  17. M. Mathur and T. P. Sreeraj, Phys. Rev. D 94, 085029 (2016).
  18. D. B. Kaplan and J. R. Stryker, arXiv:1806.08797.
  19. J. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).
  20. E. Fradkin and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2637 (1978).
  21. J. Zhang, J. Unmuth-Yockey, J. Zeiher, A. Bazavov, S.-W. Tsai, and Y. Meurice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 223201 (2018).
  22. J. Unmuth-Yockey, J. Zhang, A. Bazavov, Y. Meurice, and S.-W. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 98, 094511 (2018).
  23. J. B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 659 (1979).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation