Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Three-body charmed baryon decays with SU(3) flavor symmetry

C. Q. Geng1,2,3, Y. K. Hsiao1, Chia-Wei Liu2, and Tien-Hsueh Tsai2

  • 1School of Physics and Information Engineering, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004
  • 2Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300
  • 3Physics Division, National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Hsinchu 300

Phys. Rev. D 99, 073003 – Published 12 April, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.073003

Abstract

We study the three-body antitriplet BcBnMM decays with the SU(3) flavor [SU(3)f] symmetry, where Bc denotes the charmed baryon antitriplet of (Ξc0,Ξc+,Λc+), and Bn and M(M) represent baryon and meson octets, respectively. By considering only the S-wave MM-pair contributions without resonance effects, the decays of BcBnMM can be decomposed into irreducible forms with 11 parameters under SU(3)f, which are fitted by the 14 existing data, resulting in a reasonable value of χ2/d.o.f.=2.8 for the fit. Consequently, we find that the triangle sum rule of A(Λc+nK¯0π+)A(Λc+pKπ+)2A(Λc+pK¯0π0)=0 given by the isospin symmetry holds under SU(3)f, where A stands for the decay amplitude. In addition, we predict that B(Λc+nπ+K¯0)=(0.9±0.8)×102, which is 3–4 times smaller than the BESIII observation, indicating the existence of the resonant states. For the to-be-observed BcBnMM decays, we compute the branching fractions with the SU(3)f amplitudes to be compared to the BESIII and LHCb measurements in the future.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. A. Zupanc et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 042002 (2014).
  2. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 052001 (2016).
  3. C. Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), Chin. Phys. C 40, 100001 (2016).
  4. M. Berger et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 112006 (2018).
  5. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 112001 (2017).
  6. C. D. Lu, W. Wang, and F. S. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 93, 056008 (2016).
  7. M. Gronau, J. L. Rosner, and C. G. Wohl, Phys. Rev. D 97, 116015 (2018); 98, 073003(A) (2018).
  8. S. B. Yang et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 011801 (2016).
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 043.
  10. J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1513 (1989).
  11. A. Ali, G. Kramer, and C. D. Lu, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094009 (1998).
  12. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, and J. N. Ng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 011801 (2007).
  13. Y. K. Hsiao and C. Q. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 91, 116007 (2015).
  14. H. Y. Cheng and B. Tseng, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1042 (1992); 55, 1697(E) (1997).
  15. H. Y. Cheng and B. Tseng, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4188 (1993).
  16. P. Zenczykowski, Phys. Rev. D 50, 402 (1994).
  17. Fayyazuddin and Riazuddin, Phys. Rev. D 55, 255; 56, 531(E) (1997).
  18. R. Dhir and C. S. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114008 (2015).
  19. H. Y. Cheng, X. W. Kang, and F. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074028 (2018).
  20. X. G. He, Y. K. Hsiao, J. Q. Shi, Y. L. Wu, and Y. F. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 64, 034002 (2001).
  21. H. K. Fu, X. G. He, and Y. K. Hsiao, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074002 (2004).
  22. Y. K. Hsiao, C. F. Chang, and X. G. He, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114002 (2016).
  23. X. G. He and G. N. Li, Phys. Lett. B 750, 82 (2015).
  24. M. He, X. G. He, and G. N. Li, Phys. Rev. D 92, 036010 (2015).
  25. Y. Grossman and D. J. Robinson, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 067.
  26. D. Pirtskhalava and P. Uttayarat, Phys. Lett. B 712, 81 (2012).
  27. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014014 (2012).
  28. M. J. Savage and R. P. Springer, Phys. Rev. D 42, 1527 (1990).
  29. M. J. Savage, Phys. Lett. B 257, 414 (1991).
  30. G. Altarelli, N. Cabibbo, and L. Maiani, Phys. Lett. 57B, 277 (1975).
  31. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, Y. H. Lin, and L. L. Liu, Phys. Lett. B 776, 265 (2018).
  32. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 97, 073006 (2018).
  33. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 147.
  34. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 593 (2018).
  35. W. Wang, Z. P. Xing, and J. Xu, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 800 (2017).
  36. D. Wang, P. F. Guo, W. H. Long, and F. S. Yu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 066.
  37. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Phys. Lett. B 790, 225 (2019).
  38. A. J. Buras, arXiv:hep-ph/9806471.
  39. H. n. Li, C. D. Lu, and F. S. Yu, Phys. Rev. D 86, 036012 (2012).
  40. S. Fajfer, P. Singer, and J. Zupan, Eur. Phys. J. C 27, 201 (2003).
  41. Y. Grossman and S. Schacht, Phys. Rev. D 99, 033005 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation