Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantization of fields by averaging classical evolution equations

Timothy D. Andersen*

  • Georgia Institute of Technology, North Ave NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA

  • *andert@gatech.edu

Phys. Rev. D 99, 016012 – Published 14 January, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.016012

Abstract

This paper extends the formalism for quantizing field theories via a microcanonical quantum field theory and Hamilton’s principle to classical evolution equations. These are based on the well-known correspondence under a Wick rotation between quantum field theories and 4D statistical mechanical theories. By Wick rotating quantum field theories in 4+1D to 5D, the expectation values of observables are calculated for a microcanonical field theory averaging Hamiltonian flow over a fifth spacelike dimension, a technique common in lattice gauge simulations but not in perturbation theory. In a novel demonstration, averaging pairs of external lines in the classical Feynman diagrams over the fifth dimension generates diagrams with loops and vacuum fluctuations identical to Standard Model diagrams. Because it is microcanonical, this approach, while equivalent for standard quantum fields theories in the Standard Model, is able to quantize theories that have no canonical quantization. It is also unique in representing expectation values as averages over solutions to an ordinary, classical partial differential equation rather than a path integral or operator-based approaches. Hence, this approach draws a clear connection between quantum field theory and classical field theory in higher dimensions which has implications towards how quantum effects are interpreted. In particular, it raises questions about how violations of the ergodic hypothesis could influence quantum measurements even in standard, nonstatistical quantum field theory.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. B. M. McCoy, The connection between statistical mechanics and quantum field theory, Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory, edited by V. V. Bazhanov and C. J. Burden (World Scientific, Singapore 1995), pp. 26–128.
  2. R. P. Feynman, A. R. Hibbs, and D. F. Styer, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (Dover, Minneola, NY, 2010).
  3. R. P. Feynman and J. W. Wheeler, Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367 (1948).
  4. G. C. Wick, Properties of Bethe-Salpeter wave functions, Phys. Rev. 96, 1124 (1954).
  5. A. Strominger, Microcanonical quantum field theory, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 146, 419 (1983).
  6. W. Pauli, Statistical Mechanics, edited by C. P. Enz (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1973).
  7. D. J. E. Callaway and A. Rahman, Lattice gauge theory in the microcanonical ensemble, Phys. Rev. D 28, 1506 (1983).
  8. J. W. Gibbs, Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1902).
  9. A. Strominger, Microcanonical quantum gravity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 15, 489 (1983).
  10. A. Iwazaki, Microcanonical formulation of lattice gauge theories with fermions, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2756 (1985).
  11. M. Creutz and K. Moriarty, Implementation of the microcanonical Monte Carlo simulation algorithm for SU(N) lattice gauge theory calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 30, 255 (1983).
  12. D. J. E. Callaway and A. Rahman, Microcanonical Ensemble Formulation of Lattice Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 613 (1982).
  13. W. Schroers, Advanced algorithms for the simulation of gauge theories with dynamical fermionic degrees of freedom, Ph. D. thesis, BUGH Wuppertal, 2001.
  14. E. Remez and M. Goldstein, A deal with the devil: From divergent perturbation theory to an exponentially-convergent self-consistent expansion, Phys. Rev. D 98, 056017 (2018).
  15. K. J. Wiese, On the perturbation expansion of the KPZ equation, J. Stat. Phys. 93, 143 (1998).
  16. H. Kleinert, Systematic corrections to the variational calculation of the effective classical potential, Phys. Lett. A 173, 332 (1993).
  17. H. Kleinert, Strong-coupling behavior of ϕ4 theories and critical exponents, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2264 (1998).
  18. J. M. Overduin and P. S. Wesson, Kaluza-Klein gravity, Phys. Rep. 283, 303 (1997).
  19. P. A. M. Dirac, The electron wave equation in de-sitter space, Ann. Math. 36, 657 (1935).
  20. M. H. Holmes, Introduction to Perturbation Methods (Springer, New York, 2012).
  21. R. C. Helling, Solving classical field equations (2007), http://homepages.physik.uni-muenchen.de/helling/classical_fields.pdf.
  22. A. Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003).
  23. A. Iwazaki, Microcanonical formulation of quantum field theories, Phys. Lett. B 141, 342 (1984).
  24. E. Fermi, P. Pasta, S. Ulam, and M. Tsingou, Studies of the nonlinear problems, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, New Mexico, Report No. LA-1940, 1955.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation