Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Precise test of Higgs boson properties via triple Higgs boson production in vector boson fusion at future colliders

A. S. Belyaev1,2,*, P. B. Schaefers1,†, and M. C. Thomas1,‡

  • 1School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
  • 2Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, United Kingdom

  • *A.Belyaev@soton.ac.uk
  • P.Schaefers@soton.ac.uk
  • M.C.Thomas@soton.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 99, 015030 – Published 23 January, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.015030

Abstract

For certain classes of beyond the standard model theories, including composite Higgs models, the coupling of the Higgs to gauge bosons can be different from the standard model one. In this case, the multiboson production via vector boson fusion (VBF) can be hugely enhanced in comparison to the SM production one due to the lack of cancellation in longitudinal vector boson scattering. Among these processes, triple Higgs boson production in VBF plays a special role—its enhancement is especially spectacular due to the absence of background from transversely polarized vector bosons in the final state. While the rates from ppjjhhh production in vector boson fusion are too low at the LHC and even at future 33 TeV pp colliders, we have found that the 100 TeV pp future circular collider (FCC) has the unique opportunity to probe the hVV coupling far beyond the LHC sensitivity. We have evaluated the ppjjhhh rates as a function of deviation from the hVV coupling and have found that the background is much smaller than the signal for observable signal rates. We also found that the 100 TeV pp FCC can probe the hVV coupling up to the permille level, which is far beyond the LHC reach. These results highlight a special role of the hhh VBF production and stress once more the importance of the 100 TeV pp FCC.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. ATLAS Collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80fb1 of proton–proton collision data at s=13TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment (2018).
  4. CMS Collaboration, Combined measurements of the Higgs boson’s couplings at s=13TeV (2018).
  5. CMS Collaboration, Sensitivity projections for Higgs boson properties measurements at the HL-LHC (2018).
  6. ATLAS Collaboration, Physics at a high-luminosity LHC with ATLAS, in Proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study on the Future of U.S. Particle Physics: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013): Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2013 (2013), http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C1307292/docs/submittedArxivFiles/1307.7292.pdf.
  7. X.-G. He, G.-N. Li, and Y.-J. Zheng, Probing Higgs boson CP properties with tt¯H at the LHC and the 100 TeV pp collider, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550156 (2015).
  8. A. J. Barr, M. J. Dolan, C. Englert, D. E. Ferreira de Lima, and M. Spannowsky, Higgs self-coupling measurements at a 100 TeV hadron collider, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 016.
  9. M. Low and L.-T. Wang, Neutralino dark matter at 14 TeV and 100 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 161.
  10. B. S. Acharya, K. Bożek, C. Pongkitivanichkul, and K. Sakurai, Prospects for observing charginos and neutralinos at a 100 TeV proton-proton collider, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 181.
  11. B. Auerbach, S. Chekanov, J. Love, J. Proudfoot, and A. Kotwal, Sensitivity to new high-mass states decaying to tt¯ at a 100 TeV collider, Phys. Rev. D 91, 034014 (2015).
  12. A. Fowlie and M. Raidal, Prospects for constrained supersymmetry at s=33TeV and s=100TeV proton-proton super-colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2948 (2014).
  13. N. Arkani-Hamed, T. Han, M. Mangano, and L.-T. Wang, Physics opportunities of a 100 TeV proton–proton collider, Phys. Rep. 652, 1 (2016).
  14. J. Baglio, A. Djouadi, and J. Quevillon, Prospects for Higgs physics at energies up to 100 TeV, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 116201 (2016).
  15. M. Bicer et al. (TLEP Design Study Working Group), First look at the physics case of TLEP, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 164.
  16. S. Dawson et al., Working group report: Higgs boson, in Proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study on the Future of U.S. Particle Physics: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013): Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2013 (2013).
  17. R. Contino et al., Physics at a 100 TeV pp collider: Higgs and EW symmetry breaking studies, CERN Yellow Report No. CERN-TH-2016-113, 2017.
  18. D. M. Asner et al., ILC Higgs white paper, in Proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study on the Future of U.S. Particle Physics: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013): Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2013 (2013), http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C1307292/docs/submittedArxivFiles/1310.0763.pdf.
  19. B. Fuks, J. H. Kim, and S. J. Lee, Scrutinizing the Higgs quartic coupling at a future 100 TeV proton–proton collider with taus and b-jets, Phys. Lett. B 771, 354 (2017).
  20. M. Mangano, Physics at the FCC-hh, a 100 TeV pp collider, CERN Yellow Report No. CERN 2017-003-M.
  21. S. Borowka, C. Duhr, F. Maltoni, D. Pagani, A. Shivaji, and X. Zhao, Probing the scalar potential via double Higgs boson production at hadron colliders, arXiv:1811.12366 [J. High Energy Phys. (to be published)].
  22. A. Belyaev, A. Oliveira, R. Rosenfeld, and M. C. Thomas, Multi Higgs and vector boson production beyond the standard model, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 005.
  23. D. A. Dicus and H.-J. He, Scales of fermion mass generation and electroweak symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 71, 093009 (2005).
  24. F. Maltoni, J. Niczyporuk, and S. Willenbrock, The scale of fermion mass generation, Phys. Rev. D 65, 033004 (2002).
  25. E. Byckling and K. Kajantie, Particle Kinematics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973).
  26. J. M. Cornwall, D. N. Levin, and G. Tiktopoulos, Derivation of gauge invariance from high-energy unitarity bounds on the S matrix, Phys. Rev. D 10, 1145 (1974); 11, 972(E) (1975).
  27. B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Weak interactions at very high-energies: The role of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1519 (1977).
  28. M. S. Chanowitz and M. K. Gaillard, The TeV physics of strongly interacting W’s and Z’s, Nucl. Phys. B261, 379 (1985).
  29. S. S. D. Willenbrock, Pair production of W and Z bosons and the Goldstone boson equivalence theorem, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 186, 15 (1988).
  30. J. Bagger and C. Schmidt, Equivalence theorem Redux, Phys. Rev. D 41, 264 (1990).
  31. H. G. J. Veltman, The equivalence theorem, Phys. Rev. D 41, 2294 (1990).
  32. G. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol, and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2007) 045.
  33. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H.-S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  34. J. Pumplin, D. R. Stump, J. Huston, H.-L. Lai, P. Nadolsky, and W.-K. Tung, New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2002) 012.
  35. A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1729 (2013).
  36. R. Brun and F. Rademakers, ROOT—An object oriented data analysis framework, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 389, 81 (1997).
  37. M. Gouzevitch, A. Oliveira, J. Rojo, R. Rosenfeld, G. P. Salam, and V. Sanz, Scale-invariant resonance tagging in multijet events and new physics in Higgs pair production, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 148.
  38. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for pair production of Higgs bosons in the bb¯bb¯ final state using proton-proton collisions at s=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, arXiv:1804.06174.
  39. T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008).
  40. F. Bishara, R. Contino, and J. Rojo, Higgs pair production in vector-boson fusion at the LHC and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 481 (2017).
  41. C. Englert, Q. Li, M. Spannowsky, M. Wang, and L. Wang, VBS W±W±H production at the HL-LHC and a 100 TeV pp-collider, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1750106 (2017).
  42. R. Contino, D. Marzocca, D. Pappadopulo, and R. Rattazzi, On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2011) 081.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation