Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effective action for gauge bosons

Jérémie Quevillon*, Christopher Smith, and Selim Touati

  • Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble INP, 38000 Grenoble, France

  • *jeremie.quevillon@lpsc.in2p3.fr
  • chsmith@lpsc.in2p3.fr
  • touati@lpsc.in2p3.fr

Phys. Rev. D 99, 013003 – Published 16 January, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.013003

Abstract

By treating the vacuum as a medium, H. Euler and W. Heisenberg estimated the nonlinear interactions between photons well before the advent of quantum electrodynamics. In a modern language, their result is often presented as the archetype of an effective field theory (EFT). In this work, we develop a similar EFT for the gauge bosons of some generic gauge symmetry, valid for example for SU(2), SU(3), various grand unified groups, or mixed U(1)SU(N) and SU(M)SU(N) gauge groups. Using the diagrammatic approach, we perform a detailed matching procedure which remains manifestly gauge invariant at all steps, but does not rely on the equations of motion hence is valid off shell. We provide explicit analytic expressions for the Wilson coefficients of the dimension four, six, and eight operators as induced by massive scalar, fermion, and vector fields in generic representations of the gauge group. These expressions rely on a careful analysis of the quartic Casimir invariants, for which we provide a review using conventions adapted to Feynman diagram calculations. Finally, our computations show that at one loop, some operators are redundant whatever the representation or spin of the particle being integrated out, reducing the apparent complexity of the operator basis that can be constructed solely based on symmetry arguments.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (64)

  1. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
  2. E. Fermi, Nuovo Cimento 11, 1 (1934).
  3. S. Weinberg, Physica Amsterdam) 96A, 327 (1979); J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142 (1984); R. Machleidt and D. R. Entem, Phys. Rep. 503, 1 (2011).
  4. S. Weinberg, Proc. Sci., CD09 (2009) 001.
  5. H. Georgi, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 209 (1993).
  6. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  7. D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. A663, 155 (2000).
  8. M. Neubert, arXiv:hep-ph/0512222.
  9. W. Skiba, arXiv:1006.2142.
  10. S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 102.
  11. D. de Florian et al. (LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group), arXiv:1610.07922.
  12. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986); B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  13. A. De Simone and T. Jacques, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 367 (2016).
  14. C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2008) 014.
  15. J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 082.
  16. A. Cadene, P. Berceau, M. Fouche, R. Battesti, and C. Rizzo, Eur. Phys. J. D 68, 16 (2014).
  17. F. D. Valle, A. Ejlli, U. Gastaldi, G. Messineo, E. Milotti, R. Pengo, G. Ruoso, and G. Zavattini, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 24 (2016).
  18. T. Yamazaki, T. Inada, T. Namba, S. Asai, T. Kobayashi, A. Matsuo, K. Kindo, and H. Nojiri, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 833, 122 (2016).
  19. R. P. Mignani, V. Testa, D. G. Caniulef, R. Taverna, R. Turolla, S. Zane, and K. Wu, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 465, 492 (2017).
  20. L. M. Capparelli, A. Damiano, L. Maiani, and A. D. Polosa, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 754 (2017).
  21. M. Born and L. Infeld, Proc. R. Soc. A 144, 425 (1934); 147, 522 (1934).
  22. A. A. Tseytlin, in The Many Faces of the Superworld, edited by M. A. Shifman, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), pp. 417–452.
  23. J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, and T. You, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 261802 (2017).
  24. J. Ellis and S. F. Ge, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 041801 (2018).
  25. J. A. Gracey, Nucl. Phys. B634, 192 (2002); 696, 295(E) (2004); Phys. Rev. D 97, 025009 (2018).
  26. M. K. Gaillard, Nucl. Phys. B268, 669 (1986).
  27. O. Cheyette, Nucl. Phys. B297, 183 (1988).
  28. B. Henning, X. Lu, and H. Murayama, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 023.
  29. A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quevillon, and T. You, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 180.
  30. S. A. R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You, and Z. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 762, 166 (2016).
  31. S. A. R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You, and Z. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 054.
  32. Z. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 152.
  33. F. Boudjema, Phys. Lett. B 187, 362 (1987).
  34. S. Okubo, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 23, 8 (1982).
  35. T. van Ritbergen, A. N. Schellekens, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 14, 41 (1999).
  36. For an introduction, see e.g., A. Dobado, A. Gomez-Nicola, A. L. Maroto, and J. R. Pelaez, Effective lagrangians for the standard model (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997).
  37. T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2856 (1975).
  38. D. V. Vassilevich, Phys. Rep. 388, 279 (2003).
  39. A. E. M. van de Ven, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, 2311 (1998).
  40. L. L. Salcedo, Eur. Phys. J. C 37, 511 (2004).
  41. A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quevillon, and T. You, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 028.
  42. M. Reuter, M. G. Schmidt, and C. Schubert, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 259, 313 (1997).
  43. D. Fliegner, P. Haberl, M. G. Schmidt, and C. Schubert, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 264, 51 (1998).
  44. N. Ahmadiniaz and C. Schubert, AIP Conf. Proc. 1492, 199 (2012).
  45. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  46. R. Mertig, M. Bohm, and A. Denner, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991); V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, 207, 432 (2016).
  47. H. H. Patel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 276 (2015).
  48. V. Shtabovenko, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 48 (2017).
  49. W. H. Furry, Phys. Rev. 51, 125 (1937).
  50. E. A. Uehling, Phys. Rev. 48, 55 (1935).
  51. H. Fanchiotti, H. O. Girotti, and A. Sirlin, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 4, 826 (1972); 4, 826 (1972).
  52. F. X. Dong, X. D. Jiang, and X. J. Zhou, J. Phys. G 19, 969 (1993).
  53. S. Weinberg, in Lectures on Elementary Particles and Quantum Field Theory, edited by S. Deser, M. Grisaru, and H. Pendleton (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1970), Vol. 1.
  54. F. Preucil and J. Horejší, J. Phys. G 45, 085005 (2018).
  55. J. Pasukonis, arXiv:0710.0159.
  56. M. Bace and N. D. H. Dass, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 94, 349 (1975).
  57. M. B. Gavela, G. Girardi, C. Malleville, and P. Sorba, Nucl. Phys. B193, 257 (1981).
  58. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, J. Fujimoto, T. Ishikawa, T. Kaneko, K. Kato, and Y. Shimizu, Phys. Rep. 430, 117 (2006).
  59. E. H. Simmons, Phys. Lett. B 226, 132 (1989); 246, 471 (1990).
  60. R. Slansky, Phys. Rep. 79, 1 (1981).
  61. M. L. Laursen, K. O. Mikaelian, and M. A. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 23, 2795 (1981).
  62. G. Belanger and F. Boudjema, Phys. Lett. B 288, 210 (1992); G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, Y. Kurihara, D. Perret-Gallix, and A. Semenov, Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 283 (2000).
  63. M. L. Laursen, M. A. Samuel, G. B. Tupper, and A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 27, 196 (1983).
  64. M. Stohr and J. Horejsi, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3775 (1994); M. Baillargeon, F. Boudjema, E. Chopin, and V. Lafage, Z. Phys. C 71, 431 (1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation