Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Four-quark structure of the Zc(3900), Z(4430), and Xb(5568) states

Fabian Goerke1, Thomas Gutsche1, Mikhail A. Ivanov2, Jürgen G. Körner3, Valery E. Lyubovitskij1,4,5, and Pietro Santorelli6,7

  • 1Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Tübingen, Kepler Center for Astro and Particle Physics, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
  • 2Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
  • 3PRISMA Cluster of Excellence, Institut für Physik, Thomas GutscheJohannes Gutenberg-Universität, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
  • 4Department of Physics, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
  • 5Laboratory of Particle Physics, Mathematical Physics Department, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenin Avenue 30, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
  • 6Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, Via Cintia, Edificio 6, 80126 Napoli, Italy
  • 7Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Napoli, 80126 Napoli, Italy

Phys. Rev. D 94, 094017 – Published 15 November, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.094017

Abstract

We examine the four-quark structure of the recently discovered charged Zc(3900), Z(4430), and Xb(5568) states. We calculate the widths of the strong decays Zc+J/ψπ+ (ηcρ+, D¯0D*+, D¯*0D+), Z(4430)+J/ψπ+ (ψ(2s)π+), and Xb+Bsπ+ within a covariant quark model previously developed by us. We find that the tetraquark-type current widely used in the literature for the Zc(3900) leads to a significant suppression of the D¯D* and D¯*D modes. Contrary to this a molecular-type current provides an enhancement by a factor of 6–7 for the D¯D* modes compared with the Zc+J/ψπ+, ηcρ+ modes in agreement with recent experimental data from the BESIII Collaboration. In the case of the Z(4430) state we test a sensitivity of the ratio RZ of the Z(4430)+ψ(2s)π+ and Z(4430)+J/ψπ+ decay rates to a choice of the size parameter ΛZ(4430) of the Z(4430). Using the upper constraint for the sum of these two modes deduced from the LHCb Collaboration data we find that RZ varies from 4.64 to 4.08 when ΛZ(4430) changes from 2.2 to 3.2 GeV. Also we make the prediction for the Z(4430)+D*+D¯*0 decay rate.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013).
  2. Z. Q. Liu et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013).
  3. T. Xiao, S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, and K. K. Seth, Phys. Lett. B 727, 366 (2013).
  4. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 022001 (2014).
  5. Z. Liu, arXiv:1504.06102.
  6. J. M. Dias, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and C. M. Zanetti, Phys. Rev. D 88, 016004 (2013).
  7. L. Maiani, V. Riquer, R. Faccini, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111102 (2013).
  8. V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 022003 (2016).
  9. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 152003 (2016).
  10. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074024 (2016).
  11. Z. G. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 66, 335 (2016).
  12. W. Chen, H. X. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 022002 (2016).
  13. C. M. Zanetti, M. Nielsen, and K. P. Khemchandani, Phys. Rev. D 93, 096011 (2016).
  14. J. X. Cheng and D. Y. Chen, arXiv:1603.00228.
  15. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114007 (2016).
  16. Y. R. Liu, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074023 (2016).
  17. J. M. Dias, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martínez Torres, M. Nielsen, and C. M. Zanetti, Phys. Lett. B 758, 235 (2016).
  18. Z. G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 279 (2016).
  19. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 351 (2016).
  20. X. G. He and P. Ko, Phys. Lett. B 761, 92 (2016).
  21. Y. Jin and S. Y. Li, Phys. Rev. D 94, 014023 (2016).
  22. F. Stancu, J. Phys. G 43, 105001 (2016).
  23. T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Lett. B 760, 627 (2016).
  24. F. K. Guo, U. G. Meissner, and B. S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 65, 593 (2016).
  25. Q. F. Lü and Y. B. Dong, arXiv:1603.06417.
  26. A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Phys. Lett. B 758, 292 (2016).
  27. M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, E. Oset, Z. F. Sun, and X. Liu, Phys. Lett. B 757, 515 (2016).
  28. A. Ali, L. Maiani, and A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034036 (2016).
  29. S.-K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 142001 (2008).
  30. R. Mizuk et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 80, 031104(R) (2009).
  31. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 79, 112001 (2009).
  32. K. Chilikin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 074026 (2013).
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 222002 (2014).
  34. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 92, 112009 (2015).
  35. K. Chilikin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 90, 112009 (2014).
  36. T. Branz, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Phys. Rev. D 81, 034010 (2010).
  37. S. Dubnicka, A. Z. Dubnickova, M. A. Ivanov, and J. G. Körner, Phys. Rev. D 81, 114007 (2010).
  38. S. Dubnicka, A. Z. Dubnickova, M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, P. Santorelli, and G. G. Saidullaeva, Phys. Rev. D 84, 014006 (2011).
  39. A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and Y. L. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 76, 014005 (2007); A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, S. Kovalenko, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, 76, 014003 (2007); A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and Y. L. Ma, 76, 114008 (2007); 77, 114013 (2008); Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, 77, 094013 (2008); T. Branz, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, 79, 014035 (2009); 80, 054019 (2009); Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, Sergey Kovalenko, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, 79, 094013 (2009); T. Branz, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, 82, 054010 (2010); 82, 054025 (2010); Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, S. Kumano, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, 82, 034035 (2010); Y. Dong, A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, J. Phys. G 38, 015001 (2011); 40, 015002 (2013); Phys. Rev. D 88, 014030 (2013); T. Gutsche, M. Kesenheimer, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, 90, 094013 (2014).
  40. G. V. Efimov and M. A. Ivanov, The Quark Confinement Model of Hadrons (IOP Publishing, Bristol, 1993).
  41. M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, and P. Santorelli, Phys. Rev. D 73, 054024 (2006); M. A. Ivanov, J. G. Körner, S. G. Kovalenko, P. Santorelli, and G. G. Saidullaeva, 85, 034004 (2012).
  42. M. Nielsen, F. S. Navarra, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rep. 497, 41 (2010).
  43. K. A. Olive et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
  44. A. D. Martin and T. D Spearman, Elementary Particle Theory (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1970).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation