- Access by Xinjiang University
Thermodynamics of spinning black holes in gauged supergravity
Phys. Rev. D 94, 066002 – Published 6 September, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.066002
Abstract
In this paper we study the thermodynamics of rotating black hole solutions arising from four-dimensional gauged supergravity. We analyze two different supergravity models, characterized by prepotentials and . The black hole configurations are supported by electromagnetic charges and scalar fields with different kinds of boundary conditions. We perform our analysis in the canonical ensemble, where we find a first order phase transition for a suitable range of charges and angular momentum. We perform the thermodynamic stability check on the configurations. Using the holographic dictionary, we interpret the phase transition in terms of expectation values of operators in the dual field theory, which pertains to the class of ABJM theories living on a rotating Einstein universe. We extend the analysis to dyonic configurations as well. Lastly, we show the computation of the on shell action and mass via holographic renormalization techniques.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (74)
- J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999); Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
- S. W. Hawking and D. N. Page, Commun. Math. Phys. 87, 577 (1983).
- E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 505 (1998).
- S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 031601 (2008).
- A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson, and R. C. Myers, Phys. Rev. D 60, 014018 (1999).
- A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, C. V. Johnson, and R. C. Myers, Phys. Rev. D 60, 104026 (1999).
- S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter, and M. M. Taylor-Robinson, Phys. Rev. D 59, 064005 (1999).
- S. W. Hawking and H. S. Reall, Phys. Rev. D 61, 024014 (1999).
- M. M. Caldarelli, G. Cognola, and D. Klemm, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, 399 (2000).
- N. Altamirano, D. Kubiznak, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D 88, 101502 (2013).
- N. Altamirano, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann, and Z. Sherkatghanad, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 042001 (2014).
- M. Cvetic, G. W. Gibbons, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, arXiv:hep-th/0504080.
- G. W. Gibbons, M. J. Perry, and C. N. Pope, Classical Quantum Gravity 22, 1503 (2005).
- G. W. Gibbons, M. J. Perry, and C. N. Pope, Phys. Rev. D 72, 084028 (2005).
- M. Cvetic and S. S. Gubser, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (1999) 024.
- K. Hristov, C. Toldo, and S. Vandoren, Phys. Rev. D 88, 026019 (2013).
- L. Andrianopoli, M. Bertolini, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, P. Fre, and T. Magri, J. Geom. Phys. 23, 111 (1997).
- B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, Phys. Lett. B 108, 285 (1982).
- B. de Wit and H. Nicolai, Nucl. Phys. B208, 323 (1982).
- M. Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope, Nucl. Phys. B574, 761 (2000).
- J. P. Gauntlett, N. Kim, S. Pakis, and D. Waldram, Phys. Rev. D 65, 026003 (2001).
- D. D. K. Chow, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 032001 (2011).
- D. D. K. Chow and G. Compere, Phys. Rev. D 89, 065003 (2014).
- A. Gnecchi, K. Hristov, D. Klemm, C. Toldo, and O. Vaughan, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 127.
- O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 091.
- M. J. Duff and J. T. Liu, Nucl. Phys. B554, 237 (1999).
- C. Toldo and S. Vandoren, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 048.
- F. Benini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2016) 054.
- P. Breitenlohner and D. Z. Freedman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 144, 249 (1982).
We shifted the radial coordinate in such a way that the metric expansion for is of the form , namely there is no linear term in .
- E. Witten, arXiv:hep-th/0112258.
- T. Hertog and G. T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 221301 (2005).
- I. Papadimitriou, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2007) 075.
- T. Hertog and K. Maeda, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2004) 051.
- M. Henneaux, C. Martinez, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 322, 824 (2007).
- T. Hertog and K. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D 71, 024001 (2005).
- A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Classical Quantum Gravity 1, L39 (1984).
- A. Ashtekar and S. Das, Classical Quantum Gravity 17, L17 (2000).
Moreover, we will not consider the possible variation of the cosmological constant. For examples of analysis where this is done, refer to [56, 72]
We verified this up to values of charges .
- R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Lect. Notes Phys. 906, 1 (2015).
- O. Delice and T. Durgut, Phys. Rev. D 92, 024053 (2015).
- A. N. Aliev, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 58 (2016).
- V. Cardoso and O. J. C. Dias, Phys. Rev. D 70, 084011 (2004).
- A. N. Aliev and O. Delice, Phys. Rev. D 79, 024013 (2009).
- T. Birkandan and M. Cvetic, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 085007 (2015).
- M. Cvetic, M. J. Duff, P. Hoxha, J. T. Liu, H. Lü, J. X. Lu, R. Martinez-Acosta, C. N. Pope, H. Sati, and T. A. Tran, Nucl. Phys. B558, 96 (1999).
- M. Berkooz, A. Sever, and A. Shomer, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2002) 034.
- D. Klemm and O. Vaughan, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 053.
- D. Klemm, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 019.
- S. L. Cacciatori and D. Klemm, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2010) 085.
This is different than the Kerr-Newman black hole case. The latter configuration is recovered for , therefore the only possible solution to eq. (34) is and . In other words, the singularity of the Kerr-Newman solution is located at the equatorial plane and it is a ring. The solution (25) instead has a surface-like singularity, whose radius varies with .
- I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2005) 004.
In these coordinates the metric expansion for is already of the form .
- D. Kastor, S. Ray, and J. Traschen, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 195011 (2009).
- M. Cvetic, G. W. Gibbons, D. Kubiznak, and C. N. Pope, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024037 (2011).
We traded the dependence in for the one in by means of the relation .
- I. Papadimitriou, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 014.
- J. Lindgren, I. Papadimitriou, A. Taliotis, and J. Vanhoof, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 094.
- A. Donos, J. P. Gauntlett, and C. Pantelidou, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 061.
Among the limitations of our ansatz, for instance, a rotating solution with both non vanishing vector fields and has not yet been found for the square root prepotential.
- D. Klemm, Phys. Rev. D 89, 084007 (2014).
- R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubiznak, and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 031101 (2015).
- H. Lü, Y. Pang, and C. N. Pope, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 033.
We must add the term imposing the Neumann boundary conditions on as well. The form of this term can be read in [33], Table 2, term , however this has a vanishing contribution on the on-shell action for these solutions, hence we do not report it here.
Alternative but equivalent renormalization procedures involve the addition of topological invariants such as the Gauss–Bonnet term, see i.e. [73, 74].
- J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2000) 003.
- I. Papadimitriou, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 008.
- S. W. Hawking and S. F. Ross, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5865 (1995).
- A. Gnecchi and C. Toldo, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 075].
- A. Batrachenko, J. T. Liu, R. McNees, W. A. Sabra, and W. Y. Wen, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2005) 034.
- D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 033.
- R. Olea, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2005) 023.
- O. Miskovic and R. Olea, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124020 (2009).