- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Time dependence of adiabatic particle number

Robert Dabrowski and Gerald V. Dunne

  • Department of Physics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3046, USA

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 94, 065005 – Published 8 September, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.065005

Abstract

We consider quantum field theoretic systems subject to a time-dependent perturbation, and discuss the question of defining a time-dependent particle number not just at asymptotic early and late times, but also during the perturbation. Naïvely, this is not a well-defined notion for such a nonequilibrium process, as the particle number at intermediate times depends on a basis choice of reference states with respect to which particles and antiparticles are defined, even though the final late-time particle number is independent of this basis choice. The basis choice is associated with a particular truncation of the adiabatic expansion. The adiabatic expansion is divergent, and we show that if this divergent expansion is truncated at its optimal order, a universal time dependence is obtained, confirming a general result of Dingle and Berry. This optimally truncated particle number provides a clear picture of quantum interference effects for perturbations with nontrivial temporal substructure. We illustrate these results using several equivalent definitions of adiabatic particle number: the Bogoliubov, Riccati, spectral function and Schrödinger picture approaches. In each approach, the particle number may be expressed in terms of the tiny deviations between the exact and adiabatic solutions of the Ermakov-Milne equation for the associated time-dependent oscillators.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons, Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
  2. J. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
  3. W. Greiner, B. Müller, and J. Rafelski, Quantum Electrodynamics of Strong Fields (Springer, Berlin, 1985).
  4. G. V. Dunne, Heisenberg-Euler effective Lagrangians: Basics and extensions, in From Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics, edited by M. Shifman et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005), Vol. 1.
  5. L. Parker, Particle Creation in Expanding Universes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 562 (1968); Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. 1., Phys. Rev. 183, 1057 (1969); Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. 2., Phys. Rev. D 3, 346 (1971); 3, 2546(E) (1971).
  6. Y. B. Zeldovich, Particle creation in cosmology, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 12, 443 (1970); Y. B. Zeldovich and A. A. Starobinsky, Particle production and vacuum polarization in an anisotropic gravitational field, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 1159 (1972).
  7. L. Parker and S. A. Fulling, Adiabatic regularization of the energy momentum tensor of a quantized field in homogeneous spaces, Phys. Rev. D 9, 341 (1974).
  8. V. F. Mukhanov and S. Winitzki, Introduction to Quantum Effects in Gravity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
  9. E. A. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008).
  10. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983).
  11. E. Mottola, Particle creation in de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D 31, 754 (1985).
  12. R. Bousso, A. Maloney, and A. Strominger, Conformal vacua and entropy in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 65, 104039 (2002).
  13. E. Greenwood, D. C. Dai, and D. Stojkovic, Time dependent fluctuations and particle production in cosmological de Sitter, Phys. Lett. B 692, 226 (2010).
  14. A. M. Polyakov, De Sitter space and eternity, Nucl. Phys. B797, 199 (2008); Decay of vacuum energy B834, 316 (2010).
  15. P. R. Anderson and E. Mottola, On the instability of global de Sitter space to particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104038 (2014); Quantum vacuum instability of “eternal” de Sitter Space, 89, 104039 (2014).
  16. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738 (1977).
  17. L. H. Ford, Gravitational particle production and inflation, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2955 (1987).
  18. D. Boyanovsky, D. Cormier, H. J. de Vega, and R. Holman, Out-of-equilibrium dynamics of an inflationary phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3373 (1997).
  19. T. Vachaspati, D. Stojkovic, and L. Krauss, Observation of incipient black holes and the information loss problem, Phys. Rev. D 76, 024005 (2007); M. Kolopanis and T. Vachaspati, Quantum excitations in time-dependent backgrounds, 87, 085041 (2013).
  20. R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and P. Spindel, A primer for black hole quantum physics, Phys. Rep. 260, 329 (1995).
  21. G. Mahajan and T. Padmanabhan, Particle creation, classicality, and related issues in quantum field theory: I. Formalism and toy models, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 661 (2008); Particle creation, classicality, and related issues in quantum field theory: II. Examples from field theory, 40, 709 (2008).
  22. W. G. Unruh, Notes on black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
  23. R. Schutzhold, G. Schaller, and D. Habs, Signatures of the Unruh Effect from Electrons Accelerated by Ultra-Strong Laser Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 121302 (2006); 97, 139902(E) (2006).
  24. F. Gelis and R. Venugopalan, Particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources, I: Formalism and main results, Nucl. Phys. A776, 135 (2006); Particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources, II: Generating functions, A779, 177 (2006).
  25. D. Kharzeev and K. Tuchin, From color glass condensate to quark gluon plasma through the event horizon, Nucl. Phys. A753, 316 (2005); D. Kharzeev, E. Levin, and K. Tuchin, Multi-particle production and thermalization in high-energy QCD, Phys. Rev. C 75, 044903 (2007).
  26. F. Gelis, E. Iancu, J. Jalilian-Marian, and R. Venugopalan, The color glass condensate, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 463 (2010).
  27. R. Ruffini, G. Vereshchagin, and S. Xue, Electron-positron pairs in physics and astrophysics: From heavy nuclei to black holes, J. Phys. Rep. 487, 1 (2010).
  28. G. Mourou, T. Tajima, and S. Bulanov, Optics in the relativistic regime, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 309 (2006).
  29. M. Marklund and P. Shukla, Nonlinear collective effects in photon photon and photon plasma interactions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 591 (2006).
  30. G. V. Dunne, New strong-field QED effects at ELI: Nonperturbative vacuum pair production, Eur. Phys. J. D 55, 327 (2009).
  31. A. Di Piazza, C. Muller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1177 (2012).
  32. T. Oka and H. Aoki, Nonequilibrium quantum breakdown in a strongly correlated electron system, in Quantum and Semi-Classical Percolation and Breakdown in Disordered Solids, Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 762, edited by A. K. Sen, K. K. Bardhan, and B. K. Chakrabarti (Springer, New York, 2009).
  33. P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, and F. Nori, Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1 (2012).
  34. S. N. Shevchenko, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg interferometry, Phys. Rep. 492, 1 (2010).
  35. V. V. Dodonov, Current status of the dynamical Casimir effect, Phys. Scr. 82, 038105 (2010).
  36. C. M. Wilson, G. Johansson, A. Pourkabirian, M. Simoen, J. R. Johansson, T. Duty, F. Nori, and P. Delsing, Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect in a superconducting circuit, Nature (London) 479, 376 (2011).
  37. E. Akkermans and G. V. Dunne, Ramsey Fringes and Time-Domain Multiple-Slit Interference from Vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 030401 (2012).
  38. J. Gabelli and B. Reulet, Shaping a time-dependent excitation to minimize shot noise in a tunnel junction, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075403 (2013).
  39. E. Brezin and C. Itzykson, Pair production in vacuum by an alternating field, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1191 (1970).
  40. V. S. Popov, Pair production in a variable external field (quasiclassical approximation), Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 709 (1972); Pair production in a variable and homogeneous electric fields as an oscillator problem, 35, 659 (1972).
  41. V. G. Bagrov, D. M. Gitman, S. P. Gavrilov, and S. M. Shvartsman, Creation of boson pairs in a vacuum, Izv. Vuz. Fiz. 3, 71 (1975); D. Gitman and S. Gavrilov, Quantum processes in a strong electromagnetic field. Creating pairs, 1, 94 (1977); S. P. Gavrilov and D. M. Gitman, Vacuum instability in external fields, Phys. Rev. D 53, 7162 (1996).
  42. Y. Kluger, E. Mottola, and J. Eisenberg, The quantum Vlasov equation and its Markov limit, Phys. Rev. D 58, 125015 (1998).
  43. S. Habib, C. Molina-Paris, and E. Mottola, Energy momentum tensor of particles created in an expanding universe, Phys. Rev. D 61, 024010 (1999).
  44. S. P. Kim and D. Page, Schwinger pair production via instantons in a strong electric field, Phys. Rev. D 65, 105002 (2002); Schwinger pair production in electric and magnetic fields, 73, 065020 (2006); Improved approximations for fermion pair production in inhomogeneous electric fields, 75, 045013 (2007).
  45. S. Winitzki, Cosmological particle production and the precision of the WKB approximation, Phys. Rev. D 72, 104011 (2005).
  46. S. P. Kim and C. Schubert, Non-adiabatic quantum Vlasov equation for Schwinger pair production, Phys. Rev. D 84, 125028 (2011).
  47. J. Zahn, The current density in quantum electrodynamics in time-dependent external potentials and the Schwinger effect, J. Phys. A 48, 475402 (2015).
  48. F. Gelis and N. Tanji, Schwinger mechanism revisited, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 87, 1 (2016).
  49. R. Dabrowski and G. V. Dunne, Super-adiabatic particle number in Schwinger and de Sitter particle production, Phys. Rev. D 90, 025021 (2014).
  50. R. B. Dingle, Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation (Academic Press, London, 1973).
  51. M. V. Berry, Uniform asymptotic smoothing of Stoke’s discontinuities, Proc. R. Soc. A 422, 7 (1989); Waves near Stokes lines, 427, 265 (1990); Semiclassically weak reflections above analytic and non-analytic potential barriers J. Phys. A 15, 3693 (1982).
  52. C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, The Stokes Phenomenon and Schwinger Vacuum Pair Production in Time-Dependent Laser Pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250402 (2010); Interference effects in Schwinger vacuum pair production for time-dependent laser pulses, Phys. Rev. D 83, 065028 (2011).
  53. R. Lim and M. V. Berry, Superadiabatic tracking of quantum evolution, J. Phys. A 24, 3255 (1991); R. Lim, Overlapping Stokes smoothings in adiabatic quantum transitions, 26, 7615 (1993).
  54. M. V. Berry, Transitionless quantum driving, J. Phys. A 42, 365303 (2009).
  55. G. Tayebirad, A. Zenesini, D. Ciampini, R. Mannella, O. Morsch, E. Arimondo, N. Lörch, and S. Wimberger, Time-resolved measurement of Laundau-Zener tunneling in different bases, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013633 (2010); 82, 069904(E) (2010).
  56. M. Demirplak and S. A. Rice, Adiabatic population transfer with control fields, Phys. Chem. A 107, 9937 (2003).
  57. A. del Campo, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity by Counter-Diabatic Driving, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 100502 (2013).
  58. C. Jarzynski, Generating shortcuts to adiabaticity in quantum and classical dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 88, 040101(R) (2013).
  59. M. G. Bason, M. Viteau, N. Malossi, P. Huillery, E. Arimondo, D. Ciampini, R. Fazio, V. Giovannetti, R. Mannella, and O. Morsch, High-fidelity quantum driving, Nat. Phys. 8, 147 (2012).
  60. J. Zhang, J. H. Shim, I. Niemeyer, T. Taniguchi, T. Teraji, H. Abe, S. Onoda, T. Yamamoto, T. Ohshima, J. Isoya, and D. Suter, Experimental Implementation of Assisted Quantum Adiabatic Passage in a Single Spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 240501 (2013).
  61. K. Fukushima, Spectral representation of the particle production out of equilibrium: Schwinger mechanism in pulsed electric fields, New J. Phys. 16, 073031 (2014).
  62. K. Fukushima and T. Hayata, Schwinger mechanism with stochastic quantization, Phys. Lett. B 735, 371 (2014).
  63. J. Rau, Pair production in the quantum Boltzmann equation, Phys. Rev. D 50, 6911 (1994); J. Rau and B. Müller, From reversible quantum microdynamics to irreversible quantum transport, Phys. Rep. 272, 1 (1996).
  64. S. A. Smolyansky, G. Ropke, S. M. Schmidt, D. Blaschke, V. D. Toneev, and A. V. Prozorkevich, Dynamical derivation of a quantum kinetic equation for particle production in the Schwinger mechanism, arXiv:hep-ph/9712377; S. M. Schmidt, D. Blaschke, G. Ropke, S. A. Smolyansky, A. V. Prozorkevich, and V. D. Toneev, A quantum kinetic equation for particle production in the Schwinger mechanism, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 07, 709 (1998).
  65. A. Huet, S. P. Kim, and C. Schubert, Vlasov equation for Schwinger pair production in a time-dependent electric field, Phys. Rev. D 90, 125033 (2014).
  66. F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer, and H. Gies, Schwinger pair production in space and time-dependent electric fields: Relating the Wigner formalism to quantum kinetic theory, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105026 (2010).
  67. F. Hebenstreit, A. Ilderton, M. Marklund, and J. Zamanian, Strong field effects in laser pulses: The Wigner formalism, Phys. Rev. D 83, 065007 (2011).
  68. A. Steen, Om Formen for Integralet af den lineaere Differentialligning af anden Orden, Overs. over d. K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Forh. (1874), pp. 1–12; R. Redheffer and I. Redheffer, Steen’s 1874 paper: Historical survey and translation, Aequ. Math. 61, 131 (2001).
  69. V. P. Ermakov, Second-order differential equations: Conditions of complete integrability, Univ. Izv. Kiev 20, 1 (1880).
  70. W. E. Milne, The numerical determination of characteristic numbers, Phys. Rev. 35, 863 (1930).
  71. E. Pinney, The nonlinear differential equation y+p(x)y+cy−3=0, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1, 681 (1950).
  72. K. Husimi, Miscellanea in elementary quantum mechanics: I, Prog. Theor. Phys. 9, 238 (1953); Miscellanea in elementary quantum mechanics: II, 9, 381 (1953).
  73. W. Dittrich and M. Reuter, Classical and Quantum Dynamics (Springer, New York, 2001).
  74. H. R. Lewis, Classical and Quantum Systems with Time-Dependent Harmonic-Oscillator-Type Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 510 (1967); Class of exact invariants for classical and quantum time-dependent harmonic oscillators, J. Math. Phys. 9, 1976 (1968); H. R. Lewis and W. B. Riesenfeld, An exact quantum theory of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator and of a charged particle in a time-dependent electromagnetic field, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 10, 1458 (1969).
  75. I. M. Gel’fand and L. A. Dikii, Asymptotic behavior of the resolvent of Sturm-Liouville equations and the algebra of the Korteweg-De Vries equations, Russ. Math. Surv. 30, 5 (1975); The resolvent and Hamiltonian systems, Funct. Anal. Appl. 11, 93 (1977).
  76. A. B. Balantekin, J. E. Seger, and S. H. Fricke, Dynamical effects in pair production by electric fields, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 06, 695 (1991).
  77. G. V. Dunne and T. Hall, On the QED effective action in time-dependent electric backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D 58, 105022 (1998).
  78. K. G. Budden, Radio Waves in the Ionosphere: The Mathematical Theory of the Reflection of Radio Waves from Stratified Ionised Layers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1961).
  79. M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 35, 315 (1972).
  80. N. B. Narozhnyi and A. I. Nikishov, The simplest processes in the pair creating electric field, Yad. Fiz. 11, 1072 (1970) [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 11, 596 (1970)].

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 94, 065005– Published 8 September, 2016
  • Received 7 June 2016
Article part of CHORUS

© 2016 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation