Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nonlinear fields in generalized cosmologies

Matteo Fasiello1 and Zvonimir Vlah1,2

  • 1Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94306, USA
  • 2Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University and SLAC, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA

Phys. Rev. D 94, 063516 – Published 12 September, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.063516

Abstract

The perturbative approach to structure formation has recently received a lot of attention in the literature. In such setups the final predictions for observables like the power spectrum is often derived under additional approximations such as a simplified time dependence. Here we provide all-order perturbative integral solutions for density and velocity fields in generalized cosmologies, with a direct application to clustering quintessence. We go beyond the standard results based on extending the EdS-like approximations. As an illustrative example, we apply our findings to the calculation of the one-loop power spectrum of density and momentum fields. We find corrections close to 1% in the mildly nonlinear regime of ΛCDM cosmologies for the density power spectrum, while in the case of the density-momentum power spectrum effects can reach up to 1.5% for k0.2h/Mpc.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. K. Heitmann, M. White, C. Wagner, S. Habib, and D. Higdon, Astrophys. J. 715, 104 (2010).
  2. M. Schmittfull, Z. Vlah, and P. McDonald, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103528 (2016).
  3. J. E. McEwen, X. Fang, C. M. Hirata, and J. A. Blazek, arXiv:1603.04826.
  4. F. Bouchet, arXiv:astro-ph/9603013.
  5. F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga, and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rep. 367, 1 (2002).
  6. J. Carlson, M. White, and N. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 80, 043531 (2009).
  7. F. Bernardeau, arXiv:1311.2724.
  8. M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rev. D 73, 063519 (2006).
  9. M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rev. D 73, 063520 (2006).
  10. S. Matarrese and M. Pietroni, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2007) 026.
  11. M. Pietroni, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2008) 036.
  12. D. Blas, M. Garny, M. M. Ivanov, and S. Sibiryakov, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2016) 052.
  13. D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2012) 051.
  14. J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 082.
  15. J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Foreman, D. Green, and L. Senatore, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2014) 056.
  16. J. J. M. Carrasco, S. Foreman, D. Green, and L. Senatore, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2014) 057.
  17. D. Bertolini, K. Schutz, M. P. Solon, and K. M. Zurek, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2016) 052.
  18. E. Pajer and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 037.
  19. T. Matsubara, Phys. Rev. D 78, 083519 (2008).
  20. T. Matsubara, Phys. Rev. D 77, 063530 (2008).
  21. J. Carlson, B. Reid, and M. White, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 429, 1674 (2013).
  22. R. A. Porto, L. Senatore, and M. Zaldarriaga, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2014) 022.
  23. Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, and T. Baldauf, Phys. Rev. D 91, 023508 (2015).
  24. Z. Vlah, M. White, and A. Aviles, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2015) 014.
  25. R. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 120, 549 (2008).
  26. C. Rampf, B. Villone, and U. Frisch, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 1421 (2015).
  27. E. Sefusatti and F. Vernizzi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 047.
  28. J. M. Bardeen, J. R. Bond, N. Kaiser, and A. S. Szalay, Astrophys. J. 304, 15 (1986).
  29. Strictly speaking in an EdS universe the linear growth is D+=a. The approximation commonly used in ΛCDM simply replaces D+ where the scale factor would be in the exact EdS universe. We shall mean precisely this approximation when in the manuscript we refer to EdS-like approximation.

  30. D. Bertolini, K. Schutz, M. P. Solon, J. R. Walsh, and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 93, 123505 (2016).
  31. S. Anselmi, G. Ballesteros, and M. Pietroni, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2011) 014.
  32. G. D’Amico and E. Sefusatti, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2011) 013.
  33. F. Bernardeau, Astrophys. J. 433, 1 (1994).
  34. B. Jain and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 456, 43 (1996).
  35. M. Peloso and M. Pietroni, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2013) 031.
  36. A. Kehagias and A. Riotto, Nucl. Phys. B873, 514 (2013).
  37. F. Bernardeau, N. Van de Rijt, and F. Vernizzi, Phys. Rev. D 85, 063509 (2012).
  38. T. Okumura, U. Seljak, Z. Vlah, and V. Desjacques, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2014) 003.
  39. U. Seljak and P. McDonald, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2011) 039.
  40. Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, P. McDonald, T. Okumura, and T. Baldauf, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2012) 009.
  41. T. Okumura, U. Seljak, P. McDonald, and V. Desjacques, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2012) 010.
  42. Z. Vlah, U. Seljak, T. Okumura, and V. Desjacques, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 053.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation