- Rapid Communication
- Access by Xinjiang University
Spacetime foam induced collective bundling of intense fields
Phys. Rev. D 94, 061501(R) – Published 19 September, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.061501
Abstract
The influence of spacetime foam on a broad class of bosonic fields with arbitrary numbers of particles in the low-energy regime is investigated. Based on a recently formulated general description of open quantum gravitational systems, we analyze the propagation of scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational waves on both long and short time scales with respect to their mean frequencies. For the long time propagation, the Markov approximation that neglects the effects of initial conditions of these waves is employed. In this case, despite intuitively expected decoherence and dissipation from the noisy spacetime, we show that such phenomena turn out to be completely suppressed for scalar bosons, photons, and gravitons, which are coupled to gravity but otherwise free. The short time effects are then recovered through the transient non-Markovian evolution. Focusing on scalar bosons in initially incoherent states, we find that the resulting quantum dissipation depends strongly on the distribution of the particle momentum states. We further identify a hitherto undiscovered collective antidissipation mechanism for a large number of particles. The surprising new effect tends to “bundle” identical particles within sharply distributed momentum states having a width inversely proportional to the particle number due to the thermal fluctuations, or its square root due to the vacuum fluctuations of spacetime.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (31)
- C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2013).
- E. Joos et al., Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
- M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition (Springer, Berlin, 2008).
- B. Lamine et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 050405 (2006).
- G. Amelino-Camelia, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024015 (2000).
- S. Schiller et al., Phys. Rev. D 69, 027504 (2004).
- C. H. -T. Wang et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 23, L59 (2006).
- V. A. De Lorenci and L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 91, 044038 (2015).
- H.-P. Breuer et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 105012 (2009).
- B. S. Kay, Classical Quantum Gravity 15, L89 (1998).
- C. Anastopoulos and B. L. Hu, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 165007 (2013).
- M. P. Blencowe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021302 (2013).
- C. Anastopoulos, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1600 (1996).
- W. L. Power and I. C. Percival, Proc. R. Soc. A 456, 955 (2000).
- T. Oniga and C. H.-T. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 93, 044027 (2016).
- Y. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. D 90, 063011 (2014).
- G. M. Palma et al., Proc. R. Soc. A 452, 567 (1996).
- P. R. Anderson et al., Phys. Rev. D 67, 024026 (2003).
- C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, New York, 1973).
- E. E. Flanagan and S. A. Hughes, New J. Phys. 7, 204 (2005).
- H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University, New York, 2002).
Strictly speaking, the no-decoherence result for free particles here applies to a finite distribution function of the environment such as the Planck distribution . However, if diverges as , then decoherence due to a deep infrared gravitational noise could occur as reported in Ref. [11] for a single particle. We thank the referee for prompting this point.
- R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Nature (London) 177, 27 (1956).
- G. Baym, Acta Phys. Pol. B 29, 1839 (1998).
- G. Amelino-Camelia, Living Rev. Relativ. 16, 5 (2013).
- D. Arteaga et al., Phys. Rev. D 70, 044019 (2004).
- L. J. Garay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2508 (1998).
- G. Schafer, J. Phys. A 14, 677 (1981).
- B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations), Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
- V. Vasileiou et al., Nat. Phys. 11, 344 (2015).
- T. Oniga and C. H.-T. Wang, 10th IARD Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2016 (unpublished).