- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Testing the strong equivalence principle with spacecraft ranging towards the nearby Lagrangian points

Giuseppe Congedo1,* and Fabrizio De Marchi2,†

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
  • 2Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica e Aerospaziale, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, via Eudossiana, 18—I-00184 Roma, Italy

  • *giuseppe.congedo@physics.ox.ac.uk
  • †fabrizio.demarchi@uniroma1.it
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 93, 102003 – Published 9 May, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.102003

Abstract

General relativity is supported by great experimental evidence. Yet there is a lot of interest in precisely setting its limits with on going and future experiments. A question to answer is about the validity of the strong equivalence principle. Ground experiments and lunar laser ranging have provided the best upper limit on the Nordtvedt parameter σ[η]=4.4×10−4. With the future planetary mission BepiColombo, this parameter will be further improved by at least an order of magnitude. In this paper we envisage yet another possible testing environment with spacecraft ranging towards the nearby Sun-Earth collinear Lagrangian points. Neglecting errors in planetary masses and ephemerides, we forecast σ[η]=6.4(2.0)×10−4 (5 yr integration time) via ranging towards L1 in a realistic (optimistic) scenario depending on current (future) range capabilities and knowledge of the Earth’s ephemerides. A combined measurement, L1+L2, gives instead 4.8(1.7)×10−4. In the optimistic scenario a single measurement of one year would be enough to reach ≈3×10−4. All figures are comparable with lunar laser ranging, but worse than BepiColombo. Performances could be much improved if data were integrated over time and over the number of satellites flying around either of the two Lagrangian points. We point out that some systematics (gravitational perturbations of other planets or figure effects) are much more in control compared to other experiments. We do not advocate a specific mission to constrain the strong equivalence principle, but we do suggest analyzing ranging data of present and future spacecrafts flying around L1/L2 (one key mission is, for instance, LISA Pathfinder). This spacecraft ranging would be a new and complementary probe to constrain the strong equivalence principle in space.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. C. M. Will, The confrontation between general relativity and experiment, Living Rev. Relativity 17, 4 (2014).
  2. G. Congedo, Derivative of the light frequency shift as a measure of spacetime curvature for gravitational wave detection, Phys. Rev. D 91, 082004 (2015).
  3. G. Congedo, Measuring test mass acceleration noise in space-based gravitational wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. D 91, 062006 (2015).
  4. E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, S. Hoedl, and S. Schlamminger, Torsion balance experiments: A low-energy frontier of particle physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 102 (2009).
  5. P. Touboul, G. Métris, V. Lebat, and A. Robert, The MICROSCOPE experiment, ready for the in-orbit test of the equivalence principle, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 184010 (2012).
  6. S. G. Turyshev, J. G. Williams, M. Shao, J. D. Anderson, K. L. Nordtvedt, Jr., and T. W. Murphy, Jr., Laser Ranging to the Moon, Mars and Beyond, arXiv:gr-qc/0411082.
  7. T. W. Murphy, Jr., E. G. Adelberger, J. B. R. Battat, C. D. Hoyle, N. H. Johnson, R. J. McMillan, C. W. Stubbs, and H. E. Swanson, APOLLO: millimeter lunar laser ranging, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 184005 (2012).
  8. A. Milani, D. Vokrouhlický, D. Villani, C. Bonanno, and A. Rossi, Testing general relativity with the BepiColombo radio science experiment, Phys. Rev. D 66, 082001 (2002).
  9. S. M. Ransom et al., A millisecond pulsar in a stellar triple system, Nature (London) 505, 520 (2014).
  10. J.-J. Wei, H. Gao, X.-F. Wu, and P. Mészáros, Testing Einstein’s Equivalence Principle With Fast Radio Bursts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 261101 (2015).
  11. A. Nusser, On testing the equivalence principle with extragalactic bursts, Astrophys. J. 821, L2 (2016).
  12. E. O. Kahya and S. Desai, Constraints on frequency-dependent violations of Shapiro delay from GW150914, Phys. Lett. B 756, 265 (2016).
  13. T. Damour and D. Vokrouhlický, Equivalence principle and the Moon, Phys. Rev. D 53, 4177 (1996).
  14. J. G. Williams, S. G. Turyshev, and D. H. Boggs, Lunar laser ranging tests of the equivalence principle with the Earth and Moon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 1129 (2009).
  15. K. Nordtvedt, Testing relativity with laser ranging to the moon, Phys. Rev. 170, 1186 (1968).

  16. The normal point is defined by the mean flight time of the photons received back on earth after being reflected by the Moon.

  17. J. Müller, F. Hofmann, and L. Biskupek, Testing various facets of the equivalence principle using lunar laser ranging, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 184006 (2012).
  18. S. G. Turyshev and J. G. Williams, Space-based tests of gravity with laser ranging, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16, 2165 (2007).
  19. A. Milani, G. Tommei, D. Vokrouhlický, E. Latorre, and S. Cicalò, Relativistic models for the BepiColombo radioscience experiment, in IAU Symposium S261, 2009, edited by S. A. Klioner, P. K. Seidelmann, and M. H. Soffel (Cambridge University Press, 2009), Vol. 261, p. 356, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743921309990652.
  20. N. Ashby, P. L. Bender, and J. M. Wahr, Future gravitational physics tests from ranging to the BepiColombo Mercury planetary orbiter, Phys. Rev. D 75, 022001 (2007).
  21. J. D. Anderson, M. Gross, K. L. Nordtvedt, and S. G. Turyshev, The solar test of the equivalence principle, Astrophys. J. 459, 365 (1996).
  22. S. G. Turyshev, W. Farr, W. M. Folkner, A. R. Girerd, H. Hemmati, T. W. Murphy, J. G. Williams, and J. J. Degnan, Advancing tests of relativistic gravity via laser ranging to Phobos, Exp. Astron. 28, 209 (2010).
  23. K. Nordtvedt, Equivalence principle for massive bodies. I. Phenomenology, Phys. Rev. 169, 1014 (1968).
  24. J. Overduin, J. Mitcham, and Z. Warecki, Expanded solar-system limits on violations of the equivalence principle, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 015001 (2014).
  25. K. Nordvedt, Jr., Solar system Eotvos experiments, Icarus 12, 91 (1970).
  26. W. H. Clohessy and R. S. Wiltshire, Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous, J. Aerosol Sci. 27, 653 (1960).

  27. The homogeneous solution for the perturbation to the Earth’s heliocentric dynamics can be written as follows δx^3=Acosn3t+Bsinn3t+C, and δy^3=2Bcosn3t−2Asinn3t−3/2Cn3t+D, where the coefficients A, B, C, D can be determined by imposing the heliocentric initial conditions on the Earth’s position and velocity.

  28. D. Richardson, Analytic construction of periodic orbits about the collinear points, Celest. Mech. 22, 241 (1980).

  29. Any change in the starting epoch induces a corresponding change of phase in the perturbation of the range signal.

  30. As obtained from the Ka-band range error σi=0.15300/δt≈0.04  m (δt=1  h) [33, 34, 35], degraded by a conservative factor of 2.5, owing to the lower frequencies typical of the X band.

  31. G. H. Kaplan, J. A. Bangert, A. Fienga, W. Folkner, C. Hohenkerk, M. Lukashova, E. V. Pitjeva, P. K. Seidelmann, M. Sveshnikov, S. Urban, J. Vondrak, J. Weratschnig, and J. G. Williams, Historical Reflections on the Work of IAU Commission 4 (Ephemerides), arXiv:1511.01546.
  32. G. Tommei, F. De Marchi, D. Serra, and G. Schettino, On the BepiColombo and Juno radio science experiments: Precise models and critical estimates, in Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace) (IEEE, Benevento, Italy, 2015), p. 323.
  33. G. Schettino, S. Cicalò, S. Di Ruzza, and G. Tommei, The relativity experiment of MORE: Global full-cycle simulation and results, in Metrology for Aerospace (MetroAeroSpace) (IEEE, Benevento, Italy, 2015) p. 141.
  34. L. Iess and G. Boscagli, Advanced radio science instrumentation for the mission BepiColombo to Mercury, Planet. Space Sci. 49, 1597 (2001).
  35. S. Cicalò, G. Schettino, S. Di Ruzza, E. M. Alessi, G. Tommei, and A. Milani, The BepiColombo MORE gravimetry and rotation experiments with the ORBIT14 software, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 1507 (2016).
  36. M. Armano et al., The LISA Pathfinder mission, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 610, 012005 (2015).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 93, 102003– Published 9 May, 2016
  • Received 21 February 2016

© 2016 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation