- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Supersoft supersymmetry, conformal sequestering, and single scale supersymmetry breaking

Ran Ding1, Tianjun Li2,3, Florian Staub4, and Bin Zhu5

  • 1Center for High-Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics and Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, China (KITPC), Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China
  • 3School of Physical Electronics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, People’s Republic of China
  • 4Theory Division, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland
  • 5Institute of Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 93, 095028 – Published 31 May, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.095028

Abstract

Supersymmetric standard models (SSMs) with Dirac gauginos have the appealing supersoft property that they only cause finite contributions to scalar masses. Considering gauge mediated SUSY breaking with conformal sequestering and assuming there is one and only one fundamental parameter with dimension mass arising from supersymmetry breaking, we find a cancellation between the dominant terms that contribute to the electroweak fine tuning (EWFT). The resulting EWFT measure can be of order one even for supersymmetric particle masses and μ-terms in the TeV range.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  2. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  3. J. Camargo-Molina, B. O’Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2013) 103.
  4. N. Blinov and D. E. Morrissey, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 106.
  5. D. Chowdhury, R. M. Godbole, K. A. Mohan, and S. K. Vempati, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 110.
  6. J. E. Camargo-Molina, B. Garbrecht, B. O’Leary, W. Porod, and F. Staub, Phys. Lett. B 737, 156 (2014).
  7. U. Chattopadhyay and A. Dey, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2014) 161.
  8. M. Bastero-Gil, C. Hugonie, S. King, D. Roy, and S. Vempati, Phys. Lett. B 489, 359 (2000).
  9. R. Dermisek and J. F. Gunion, Phys. Rev. D 73, 111701 (2006).
  10. Y. Zhang, H. An, X.-d. Ji, and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D 78, 011302 (2008).
  11. U. Ellwanger, G. Espitalier-Noel, and C. Hugonie, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 105.
  12. G. G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Nucl. Phys. B862, 710 (2012).
  13. M. Hirsch, M. Malinsky, W. Porod, L. Reichert, and F. Staub, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 084.
  14. G. G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and F. Staub, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 074.
  15. T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling, A. D. Medina, and M. A. Schmidt, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 032.
  16. M. Perelstein and B. Shakya, Phys. Rev. D 88, 075003 (2013).
  17. D. Kim, P. Athron, C. Balazs, B. Farmer, and E. Hutchison, Phys. Rev. D 90, 055008 (2014).
  18. A. Kaminska, G. G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg, and F. Staub, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 153.
  19. M. Y. Binjonaid and S. F. King, Phys. Rev. D 90, 055020 (2014); 90, 079903(E) (2014).
  20. P. J. Fox, A. E. Nelson, and N. Weiner, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2002) 035.
  21. Z. Chacko, P. J. Fox, and H. Murayama, Nucl. Phys. B706, 53 (2005).
  22. L. M. Carpenter, P. J. Fox, and D. E. Kaplan, arXiv:hep-ph/0503093.
  23. I. Antoniadis, K. Benakli, A. Delgado, M. Quiros, and M. Tuckmantel, Nucl. Phys. B744, 156 (2006).
  24. G. D. Kribs, E. Poppitz, and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 78, 055010 (2008).
  25. S. D. L. Amigo, A. E. Blechman, P. J. Fox, and E. Poppitz, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 018.
  26. K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, Nucl. Phys. B816, 185 (2009).
  27. K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, Nucl. Phys. B830, 315 (2010).
  28. K. Benakli and M. D. Goodsell, Nucl. Phys. B840, 1 (2010).
  29. K. Benakli, Fortschr. Phys. 59, 1079 (2011).
  30. S. Y. Choi, D. Choudhury, A. Freitas, J. Kalinowski, and P. M. Zerwas, Phys. Lett. B 697, 215 (2011); 698, 457(E) (2011).
  31. S. Abel and M. Goodsell, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 064.
  32. K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell, and A.-K. Maier, Nucl. Phys. B851, 445 (2011).
  33. M. Heikinheimo, M. Kellerstein, and V. Sanz, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2012) 043.
  34. G. D. Kribs and A. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 85, 115014 (2012).
  35. J. Kalinowski, Acta Phys. Pol. B 42, 2425 (2011).
  36. R. Davies, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2012) 010.
  37. M. D. Goodsell, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 066.
  38. K. Benakli, M. D. Goodsell, and F. Staub, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2013) 073.
  39. S. Abel and D. Busbridge, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 098.
  40. G. D. Kribs and A. Martin, arXiv:1308.3468.
  41. C. Csaki, J. Goodman, R. Pavesi, and Y. Shirman, Phys. Rev. D 89, 055005 (2014).
  42. D. Busbridge, arXiv:1408.4605.
  43. K. Benakli, M. Goodsell, F. Staub, and W. Porod, Phys. Rev. D 90, 045017 (2014).
  44. S. Chakraborty, A. Datta, and S. Roy, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 124.
  45. R. Ding, T. Li, F. Staub, C. Tian, and B. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 92, 015008 (2015).
  46. A. E. Nelson and T. S. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 201802 (2015).
  47. D. S. M. Alves, J. Galloway, N. Weiner, and M. McCullough, Phys. Rev. D 93, 075021 (2016).
  48. S. Chakraborty, A. Datta, K. Huitu, S. Roy, and H. Waltari, Phys. Rev. D 93, 075005 (2016).
  49. M. D. Goodsell, M. E. Krauss, T. Müller, W. Porod, and F. Staub, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 132.
  50. S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 92, 035004 (2015).
  51. H. Itoyama and N. Maru, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27, 1250159 (2012).
  52. C. Frugiuele, T. Gregoire, P. Kumar, and E. Ponton, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 012.
  53. C. Frugiuele, T. Gregoire, P. Kumar, and E. Ponton, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2013) 156.
  54. P. Agrawal and C. Frugiuele, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 115.
  55. E. Bertuzzo, C. Frugiuele, T. Gregoire, and E. Ponton, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 089.
  56. T. Leggett, T. Li, J. A. Maxin, D. V. Nanopoulos, and J. W. Walker, arXiv:1403.3099.
  57. T. Leggett, T. Li, J. A. Maxin, D. V. Nanopoulos, and J. W. Walker, Phys. Lett. B 740, 66 (2015).
  58. G. Du, T. Li, D. V. Nanopoulos, and S. Raza, Phys. Rev. D 92, 025038 (2015).
  59. M. A. Luty and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. D 65, 066004 (2002).
  60. M. Luty and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. D 67, 045007 (2003).
  61. H. Murayama, Y. Nomura, and D. Poland, Phys. Rev. D 77, 015005 (2008).
  62. L. M. Carpenter and J. Goodman, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 107.
  63. D. S. M. Alves, J. Galloway, M. McCullough, and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 161801 (2015).
  64. P. Diessner, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, and D. Støckinger, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 124.
  65. P. Diessner, J. Kalinowski, W. Kotlarski, and D. Støckinger, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 760729 (2015).
  66. J. R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos, and F. Zwirner, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 01, 57 (1986).
  67. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Nucl. Phys. B306, 63 (1988).
  68. D. M. Ghilencea and G. G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B868, 65 (2013).
  69. F. Staub, arXiv:0806.0538.
  70. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1077 (2010).
  71. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 808 (2011).
  72. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1792 (2013).
  73. F. Staub, (2013), Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 (2014).
  74. W. Porod, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
  75. W. Porod and F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 (2012).
  76. J. L. Feng, K. T. Matchev, and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2322 (2000).
  77. J. L. Feng, K. T. Matchev, and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 61, 075005 (2000).
  78. M. D. Goodsell, K. Nickel, and F. Staub, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 32 (2015).
  79. M. Goodsell, K. Nickel, and F. Staub, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 290 (2015).
  80. K. Nickel and F. Staub, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2015) 139.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 93, 095028– Published 31 May, 2016
  • Received 7 October 2015
Creative Commons Logo

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation