Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Soft Pomeron in holographic QCD

Alfonso Ballon-Bayona1, Robert Carcassés Quevedo1, Miguel S. Costa1,2, and Marko Djurić1

  • 1Centro de Física do Porto e Departamento de Física e Astronomia da Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
  • 2Theory Division, Department of Physics, CERN, CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland

Phys. Rev. D 93, 035005 – Published 4 February, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.035005

Abstract

We study the graviton Regge trajectory in holographic QCD as a model for high energy scattering processes dominated by soft-Pomeron exchange. This is done by considering spin J fields from the closed string sector that are dual to glueball states of even spin and parity. In particular, we construct a model that governs the analytic continuation of the spin J field equation to the region of real J<2, which includes the scattering domain of the negative Maldelstam variable t. The model leads to approximately linear Regge trajectories and is compatible with the measured values of 1.08 for the intercept and 0.25GeV2 for the slope of the soft Pomeron. The intercept of the secondary Pomeron trajectory is in the same region of the subleading trajectories, made of mesons, proposed by Donnachie and Landshoff, and should therefore be taken into account.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Total cross-sections, Phys. Lett. B 296, 227 (1992).
  2. J. M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  3. R. C. Brower, J. Polchinski, M. J. Strassler, and C. I. Tan, The Pomeron and gauge/string duality, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007) 005.
  4. L. Cornalba and M. S. Costa, Saturation in deep inelastic scattering from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. D 78, 096010 (2008).
  5. E. Levin and I. Potashnikova, Inelastic processes in DIS and N=4 SYM, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 112.
  6. R. C. Brower, M. Djuric, I. Sarcevic, and C. I. Tan, String-gauge dual description of deep inelastic scattering at small-x, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 051.
  7. M. S. Costa and M. Djuric, Deeply virtual compton scattering from gauge/gravity duality, Phys. Rev. D 86, 016009 (2012).
  8. M. S. Costa, M. Djuric, and N. Evans, Vector meson production at low x from gauge/gravity duality, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 084.
  9. R. C. Brower, M. Djuric, and C. I. Tan, Diffractive Higgs production by AdS Pomeron fusion, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 097.
  10. V. S. Fadin, E. A. Kuraev, and L. N. Lipatov, On the Pomeranchuk singularity in asymptotically free theories, Phys. Lett. B 60B, 50 (1975); E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, The Pomeranchuk singularity in non-Abelian gauge theories, Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199 (1977); Ya. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk singularity in quantum chromodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28, 822 (1978).
  11. H. Kowalski, L. N. Lipatov, D. A. Ross, and G. Watt, Using HERA data to determine the infrared behaviour of the BFKL amplitude, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 983 (2010).
  12. U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 032.
  13. U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, and F. Nitti, Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 019.
  14. U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, G. Michalogiorgakis, and F. Nitti, Improved holographic QCD, Lect. Notes Phys. 828, 79 (2011).
  15. In the singlet sector there is also the twist 2 quark operator OJψ¯Γα1Dα2DαJψ, however we are considering processes dominated by exchange of the gluon field.

  16. For instance, the approximation (20) misses the dimensions of the operators with J>2 in the free theory limit.

  17. G. A. Jaroszkiewicz and P. V. Landshoff, Model for diffraction excitation, Phys. Rev. D 10, 170 (1974).
  18. S. Donnachie et al., Pomeron Physics and QCD, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2002).
  19. F. Brünner, D. Parganlija, and A. Rebhan, Glueball decay rates in the Witten-Sakai-Sugimoto model, Phys. Rev. D 91, 106002 (2015).
  20. H. B. Meyer and M. J. Teper, Glueball Regge trajectories and the Pomeron: A lattice study, Phys. Lett. B 605, 344 (2005); H. B. Meyer, Glueball Regge trajectories, arXiv:hep-lat/0508002.
  21. K. A. Olive (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014).
  22. J. Sonnenschein and D. Weissman, Glueballs as rotating folded closed strings, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 011.
  23. A. Donnachie and P. V. Landshoff, Elastic scattering at the LHC, arXiv:1112.2485; E. Gotsman, Amplitudes and cross sections at the LHC, arXiv:1304.7627.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation