- Access by Xinjiang University
Double parton scattering: Impact of nonperturbative parton correlations
Phys. Rev. D 93, 034015 – Published 9 February, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.034015
Abstract
We apply the phenomenological Reggeon field theory framework to investigate the relative importance of perturbative and nonperturbative multiparton correlations for the treatment of double parton scattering in proton-proton collisions. We obtain a significant correction to the so-called effective cross section for double parton scattering due to nonperturbative parton splitting. When combined with the corresponding perturbative contribution, this results in a rather weak energy and transverse momentum dependence of the effective cross section, in agreement with experimental observations at the Tevatron and the Large Hadron Collider. In addition, we observe that color fluctuations have a sizable impact on the calculated rate of double parton scattering and on the relative importance of the perturbative parton splitting mechanism.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (40)
- F. Abe et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 584 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 56, 3811 (1997).
- V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 81, 052012 (2010).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), New J. Phys. 15, 033038 (2013).
- S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2014) 032.
- N. Paver and D. Treleani, Nuovo Cimento A 70, 215 (1982); Z. Phys. C 28, 187 (1985).
- V. P. Shelest, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev, Phys. Lett. 113B, 325 (1982).
- M. Mekhfi, Phys. Rev. D 32, 2371 (1985).
- T. Sjostrand and M. van Zijl, Phys. Rev. D 36, 2019 (1987).
- B. Blok, Y. Dokshitzer, L. Frankfurt, and M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D 83, 071501 (2011).
- B. Blok, Y. Dokshitzer, L. Frankfurt, and M. Strikman, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1963 (2012).
- B. Blok, Y. Dokshitzer, L. Frankfurt, and M. Strikman, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2926 (2014).
- M. G. Ryskin and A. M. Snigirev, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114047 (2011).
- M. Diehl, D. Ostermeier, and A. Schafer, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 089.
- J. R. Gaunt, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 042.
- B. Blok, M. Strikman, and U. A. Wiedemann, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2433 (2013).
- S. Salvini, D. Treleani, and G. Calucci, Phys. Rev. D 89, 016020 (2014).
- S. J. Brodsky, L. Frankfurt, J. F. Gunion, A. H. Mueller, and M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3134 (1994).
- L. Frankfurt and M. Strikman, Phys. Rev. D 66, 031502(R) (2002).
- C. Adloff et al. (H1 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 483, 23 (2000).
- S. Chekanov et al. (ZEUS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 345 (2002).
- L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, and C. Weiss, Phys. Rev. D 69, 114010 (2004).
- A. M. Snigirev, Phys. Rev. D 81, 065014 (2010).
- J. R. Gaunt, R. Maciula, and A. Szczurek, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054017 (2014).
- B. Blok and P. Gunnellini, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 282 (2015).
- B. Blok, Y. Dokshitzer, L. Frankfurt, and M. Strikman, arXiv:1206.5594.
- V. N. Gribov, Sov. Phys. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 26, 414 (1968).
- S. Ostapchenko, Phys. Rev. D 74, 014026 (2006).
- S. Ostapchenko, Phys. Rev. D 83, 014018 (2011).
- O. V. Kancheli, JETP. Lett. 18, 274 (1973); J. L. Cardi, Nucl. Phys. B75, 413 (1974).
- A. B. Kaidalov, L. A. Ponomarev, and K. A. Ter-Martirosyan, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 44, 468 (1986).
- S. Ostapchenko, Phys. Lett. B 636, 40 (2006); Phys. Rev. D 77, 034009 (2008).
- H. J. Drescher, M. Hladik, S. Ostapchenko, and K. Werner, J. Phys. G 25, L91 (1999).
- H. J. Drescher, M. Hladik, S. Ostapchenko, T. Pierog, and K. Werner, Phys. Rep. 350, 93 (2001).
- S. Ostapchenko, H. J. Drescher, F. M. Liu, T. Pierog, and K. Werner, J. Phys. G 28, 2597 (2002).
- M. L. Good and W. D. Walker, Phys. Rev. 120, 1857 (1960).
- A. B. Kaidalov, Phys. Rep. 50, 157 (1979).
- L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, D. Treleani, and C. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 202003 (2008).
- S. Ostapchenko, arXiv:hep-ph/0501093.
- E. Gotsman, E. Levin, U. Maor, and J. S. Miller, Eur. Phys. J. C 57, 689 (2008).
- D. Treleani, Phys. Rev. D 76, 076006 (2007).