- Access by Xinjiang University
-dependence, sign of the cut, and factorization in a -channel partial-wave amplitude with Regge cuts
Phys. Rev. D 9, 1991 – Published 1 April, 1974
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1991
Abstract
Using an effective-range-type expansion in the plane for the and functions, the -channel partial-wave amplitude is expressed as , where a square-root singularity is assumed for simplicity. For linear in the following results are obtained: (1) The Regge poles (= ) are complex below a certain value. (ii) The amplitude in the scattering region is of the form , with expressible as a sum of two terms. The first term is one-half the residue of the complex pole, whether the pole be on the physical or unphysical sheet, the second term is a series involving the product . It is found by explicit calculation that if is small () then only one or two terms of the series are important up to quite high . Only at asymptotic will the series sum up to give the tip of the cut contribution, . At presently available energies, therefore, the dependence is largely given by . The results remain unchanged if the pole is on the real axis (). (iii) At the value where the poles collide, the dependence is of a typical double pole from . (iv) It is observed that the strength of the cut is manifested through and as well as through . (v) For small, fixed the term plays a crucial role in shifting the zeros in of from their simple pole values. (vi) The sign of the cut is intimately connected with the phase of the complex residues for , the width of the channel resonances, and with the question of determining the sheet on which the poles are located for . (vii) Finally, is in general not factorizable but can be written as a sum of (complex conjugate) factorized quantities.
References (12)
- P. Kaus and F. Zachariasen, Phys. Rev. D 1, 2962 (1970) R. Oehme, Phys. Lett. 20B, 414 (1969) Phys. Rev. D 4, 1485 (1971) [6]
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote
- B. R. Desai and P. R. Stevens, Phys. Lett. 45B, 497 (1973)
- M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C., 1966)
- J. S. Ball, G. Marchesini, and F. Zachariasen, Phys. Lett. 31B, 583 (1970)
Omitted endnote
- B. R. Desai and P. R. Stevens, report (unpublished)
- G. Cohen-Tannoudji, A. Morel, and H. Navelet, Nuovo Cimento 48A, 1075 (1967) R. C. Arnold and M. Blackmon, ibid. 176, 2082 (1968) F. Henyey, G. L. Kane, J. Pumplin, and M. H. Ross, Phys. Rev. 182, 1579 (1969)
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote
Omitted endnote