- Access by Xinjiang University
Color screening in cold quark matter
Phys. Rev. D 89, 125008 – Published 10 June, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.125008
Abstract
We compute—at finite quark chemical potentials—the color screening of cold quark matter at the one-loop level, comparing the normal, BCS-paired (or Higgs) phase and a singlet phase with color-singlet condensate near the Fermi surface. The latter phase is computed using the example of two-color QCD with a color-singlet diquark condensate. In contrast to the normal and Higgs phases, neither electric nor magnetic screening masses appear in the singlet phase. The absence of a magnetic mass, within a perturbative framework, is a consequence of the proper treatment of gauge invariance. While at large momenta the gluon self-energies approach those in the normal phase, the medium contributions to the infrared region below a scale of the mass gap are substantially suppressed. Infrared gluons at low quark density in the singlet phase appear protected from medium effects, unless the quark-gluon vertices are significantly enhanced in the infrared.
Article Text
References (31)
- J. C. Collins and M. J. Perry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1353 (1975).
- B. A. Freedman and L. D. McLerran, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1130 (1977); 16, 1147 (1977); 16, 1169 (1977); V. Baluni, Phys. Lett. B 72, 381 (1978); Phys. Rev. D 17, 2092 (1978); A. Kurkela, P. Romatschke, and A. Vuorinen, 81, 105021 (2010).
- M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Schäfer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1455 (2008).
- D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034007 (2000); 62, 054017 (2000); 64, 094003 (2001).
- K. Iida and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 65, 014022 (2001); M. Huang and I. A. Shovkovy, 70, 051501 (2004); 70, 094030 (2004); K. Fukushima, 72, 074002 (2005).
- D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. D 59, 094019 (1999).
- Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 117, 648 (1960).
- G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961); G. Baym, 127, 1391 (1962).
- A. Nakamura, Phys. Lett. B 149, 391 (1984).
- J. B. Kogut, D. K. Sinclair, S. J. Hands, and S. E. Morrison, Phys. Rev. D 64, 094505 (2001); J. B. Kogut, D. Toublan, and D. K. Sinclair, Phys. Lett. B 514, 77 (2001); S. Hands, J. B. Kogut, M.-P. Lombardo, and S. E. Morrison, Nucl. Phys. B558, 327 (1999); J. B. Kogut, D. K. Sinclair, S. J. Hands, and S. E. Morrison, Phys. Rev. D 64, 094505 (2001).
- T. Boz, S. Cotter, L. Fister, D. Mehta, and J.-I. Skullerud, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 87 (2013); S. Cotter, P. Giudice, S. Hands, and J.-I. Skullerud, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034507 (2013); S. Hands, P. Kenny, S. Kim, and J.-I. Skullerud, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 60 (2011); S. Hands, S. Kim, and J.-I. Skullerud, Phys. Rev. D 81, 091502 (2010); Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 193 (2006).
- G. Baym, H. Monien, C. J. Pethick, and D. G. Ravenhall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1867 (1990).
- L. McLerran and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. A796, 83 (2007).
- A. B. Migdal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 107 (1978); R. F. Sawyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 382 (1972); R. F. Sawyer and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. D 7, 953 (1973); G. Baym, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1340 (1973).
- D. V. Deryagin, D. Y. Grigoriev, and V. A. Rubakov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 07, 659 (1992); E. Shuster and D. T. Son, Nucl. Phys. B573, 434 (2000); B.-Y. Park, M. Rho, A. Wirzba, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034015 (2000); R. Rapp, E. V. Shuryak, and I. Zahed, 63, 034008 (2001); E. Nakano and T. Tatsumi, 71, 114006 (2005).
- D. Nickel, Phys. Rev. D 80, 074025 (2009); S. Carignano, D. Nickel, and M. Buballa, 82, 054009 (2010); D. Müller, M. Buballa, and J. Wambach, Phys. Lett. B 727, 240 (2013).
- T. Kojo, Y. Hidaka, L. McLerran, and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. A843, 37 (2010); T. Kojo, R. D. Pisarski, and A. M. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. D 82, 074015 (2010); T. Kojo, Y. Hidaka, K. Fukushima, L. D. McLerran, and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. A875, 94 (2012).
- D. H. Rischke, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 062001 (2001).
- R. D. Pisarski and D. H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D 60, 094013 (1999).
In Euclidean space satisfies the usual relations: and .
In the non-Abelian case instead of . On the other hand, the conserved color current associated with global color symmetry is given by , where contains gluons and ghosts.
The point here is that the regularized expression has divergent and finite terms. Gauge-variant artifacts, which are hidden in the finite terms, must be eliminated by counterterms, which however contain divergent and finite pieces as well as gauge-variant pieces if the regularization is gauge variant.
To avoid confusion, we emphasize that is not the quark number current, which in the Nambu-Gor’kov bases is instead , and is nonzero for .
Even in normal quark matter, this contribution should be taken into account because the mass in the QCD vacuum, the effective mass , differs from the current mass in chirally restored normal quark matter. Usual hard-dense-loop calculations tacitly avoid this gauge-variant artifact by using the current quark mass in the chirally symmetric vacuum.
The remaining part does not contain the interaction so that it can yield only a cut instead of poles.
If we wish to find the vertex correction, , one can—instead of calculating it explicitly—compute and for the bare vertex, and then use them to read off . In particular, when we consider the damping of gap functions in the UV, we can set and directly relate to because .
The behavior of the quark-gluon vertex in vacuum can be quite different for different choices of gauge-fixing conditions. This discussion is beyond our scope in this work.
- P. D. Powell and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 88, 014012 (2013).
This description may be misleading because a number of studies have indicated that the confined and Higgs phases can be smoothly connected [30, 31]. Indications are based on gauge-invariant correlation functions in which quarks and gluons are not separately discussed and all excitations are composite, with no color charges. Such a connection between the two phases is obscured in gauge-fixed computations using quark and gluon propagators, such as that performed here.
- E. H. Fradkin and S. H. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D 19, 3682 (1979).
- J. Greensite, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 1 (2003).