- Access by Xinjiang University
Nonexistence of the self-accelerating dipole and related questions
Phys. Rev. D 89, 125006 – Published 6 June, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.125006
Abstract
We calculate the self-force of a constantly accelerating electric dipole, showing, in particular, that classical electromagnetism does not predict that an electric dipole could self-accelerate, nor could it levitate in a gravitational field. We also resolve a paradox concerning the inertial mass of a longitudinally accelerating dipole, showing that the combined system of dipole plus field can be assigned a well-defined energy-momentum four-vector, so that the principle of relativity is satisfied. We then present some general features of electromagnetic phenomena in a reference frame described by the Rindler metric, showing in particular that an observer fixed in a gravitational field described everywhere by the Rindler metric will find any charged object supported in the gravitational field to possess an electromagnetic self-force equal to that observed by an inertial observer relative to which the body undergoes rigid hyperbolic motion. It follows that the principle of equivalence is satisfied by these systems.
Article Text
References (41)
- F. H. J. Cornish, Am. J. Phys. 54, 166 (1986).
- D. J. Griffiths, Am. J. Phys. 54, 744 (1986).
- V. Petkov, arXiv:physics/9906059.
- F. Rohrlich, Classical Charged Particles (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990), 3rd ed.
- J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley, New York, 1998), 3rd ed.
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields (Pergamon, Oxford, 1971) [1st edition (Russian) 1941].
- F. Rohrlich, Am. J. Phys. 65, 1051 (1997).
- H. Spohn, Dynamics of Charged Particles and Their Radiation Field (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004).
- J. Schwinger, Found. Phys. 13, 373 (1983).
- R. Medina, J. Phys. A 39, 3801 (2006).
- D. J. Griffiths, T. C. Proctor, and D. F. Schroeter, Am. J. Phys. 78, 391 (2010).
- D. J. Griffiths and R. E. Owen, Am. J. Phys. 51, 1120 (1983).
- F. Pinto, Phys. Rev. D 73, 104020 (2006).
- A. Ori and E. Rosenthal, Phys. Rev. D 68, 041701 (2003).
- A. Ori and E. Rosenthal, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 45, 2347 (2004).
- P. Pearle, in Electromagnetism: Paths to Research, edited by D. Teplitz (Plenum Press, New York, 1982), p. 211.
- T. C. Bradbury, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 19, 323 (1962).
- F. Rohrlich, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 22, 169 (1963).
- E. Eriksen and O. Gron, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 313, 147 (2004).
- T. Fulton and F. Rohrlich, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 9, 499 (1960).
See [22], Sec. 8.2.5.
- A. M. Steane, Relativity Made Relatively Easy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2012).
- A. M. Steane, Proc. R. Soc. A 470, 20130480 (2013).
- J. A. E. Roa-Neri and J. L. Jimenez, Found. Phys. Lett. 7, 403 (1994).
Griffiths and Szeto [27] make this same observation without providing details; however, in [12] it was overlooked.
- D. J. Griffiths and E. W. Szeto, Am. J. Phys. 46, 244 (1978).
for uniform acceleration. More generally, one must integrate Eq. (13).
- L. Page and N. I. Adams, Am. J. Phys. 13, 141 (1945).
- S. Rainville, J. K. Thompson, and D. E. Pritchard, Science 303, 334 (2004).
- E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, Living Rev. Relativity 14, 7 (2011).
- E. P. Soichiro Isoyama, Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 155012 (2012).
- A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 20, 373 (1979).
- H. Padmanabhan and T. Padmanabhan, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42, 1153 (2010).
- W. Rindler, Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2006), 2nd ed.
The full equation of motion has another term giving the gravitational contribution.
This statement could also be derived directly from the metric, using .
- E. Eriksen and O. Gron, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 286, 320 (2000).
- H. Poincaré, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 21, 129 (1906).
- A. D. Yaghjian, Relativistic Dynamics of a Charged Sphere (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006), 2nd ed.
Equation (16.24) of [22].