- Access by Xinjiang University
Impact of dark energy perturbations on the growth index
Phys. Rev. D 89, 123508 – Published 13 June, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.123508
Abstract
We show that in clustering dark energy models the growth index of linear matter perturbations, , can be much lower than in or smooth quintessence models and presents a strong variation with redshift. We find that the impact of dark energy perturbations on is enhanced if the dark energy equation of state has a large and rapid decay at low redshift. We study four different models with these features and show that we may have at . We also show that the constant parametrization for the growth rate, , is a few percent inaccurate for such models and that a redshift-dependent parametrization for can provide about four times more accurate fits for . We discuss the robustness of the growth index to distinguish between general relativity with clustering dark energy and modified gravity models, finding that some and clustering dark energy models can present similar values for .
Article Text
References (37)
- L.-M. Wang and P. J. Steinhardt, Astrophys. J. 508, 483 (1998).
- E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. D 72, 043529 (2005).
- E. V. Linder and R. N. Cahn, Astropart. Phys. 28, 481 (2007).
- S. Tsujikawa, A. De Felice, and J. Alcaniz, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2013) 030.
- S. Tsujikawa, R. Gannouji, B. Moraes, and D. Polarski, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084044 (2009).
- R. Gannouji, B. Moraes, and D. Polarski, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2009) 034.
- G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, Phys. Lett. B 485, 208 (2000).
- A. F. Heavens, T. Kitching, and L. Verde, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 380, 1029 (2007).
- T. Abbott et al. (Dark Energy Survey), arXiv:astro-ph/0510346.
- R. Laureijs et al. (EUCLID Collaboration), arXiv:1110.3193.
- W. Hu, Astrophys. J. 506, 485 (1998).
- T. Chiba, T. Okabe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023511 (2000).
- C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D 63, 103510 (2001).
- L. P. Chimento and R. Lazkoz, Phys. Rev. D 71, 023505 (2005).
- P. Creminelli, G. D’Amico, J. Norena, and F. Vernizzi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2009) 018.
- E. A. Lim, I. Sawicki, and A. Vikman, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2010) 012.
- L. R. Abramo, R. C. Batista, L. Liberato, and R. Rosenfeld, Phys. Rev. D 79, 023516 (2009).
- D. Sapone, M. Kunz, and M. Kunz, Phys. Rev. D 80, 083519 (2009).
- R. Batista and F. Pace, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2013) 044.
- M. Kunz and D. Sapone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 121301 (2007).
- B. Jain and P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 78, 063503 (2008).
- E. Bertschinger and P. Zukin, Phys. Rev. D 78, 024015 (2008).
- J. Dossett and M. Ishak, Phys. Rev. D 88, 103008 (2013).
- G. Ballesteros and A. Riotto, Phys. Lett. B 668, 171 (2008).
- T. Chiba, Phys. Rev. D 66, 063514 (2002).
- M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213 (2001).
- E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003).
- P. S. Corasaniti and E. J. Copeland, Phys. Rev. D 67, 063521 (2003).
- P. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv:1303.5076.
- C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 455, 7 (1995).
- R. Bean and O. Dore, Phys. Rev. D 69, 083503 (2004).
- B. A. Bassett, P. S. Corasaniti, and M. Kunz, Astrophys. J. 617, L1 (2004).
- M. A. Amin, P. Zukin, and E. Bertschinger, Phys. Rev. D 85, 103510 (2012).
- G. Ballesteros and J. Lesgourgues, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2010) 014.
- E. Sefusatti and F. Vernizzi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2011) 047.
- J. Dossett, M. Ishak, J. Moldenhauer, Y. Gong, and A. Wang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2010) 022.
- P. Wu, H. W. Yu, and X. Fu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2009) 019.