Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

CP-violating phenomenology of flavor conserving two Higgs doublet models

Satoru Inoue1, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf1,2, and Yue Zhang2

  • 1Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions, Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA
  • 2California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

Phys. Rev. D 89, 115023 – Published 25 June, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115023

Abstract

We analyze the constraints on CP-violating, flavor conserving two Higgs doublet models implied by measurements of Higgs boson properties at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and by the nonobservation of permanent electric dipole moments (EDMs) of molecules, atoms, and neutrons. We find that the LHC and EDM constraints are largely complementary, with the LHC studies constraining the mixing between the neutral CP-even states and the EDMs probing the effect of mixing between the CP-even and CP-odd scalars. Presently, the most stringent constraints are implied by the nonobservation of the ThO molecule EDM signal. Future improvements in the sensitivity of neutron and diamagnetic atom EDM searches could yield competitive or even more severe constraints. We analyze the quantitative impact of hadronic and nuclear theory uncertainties on the interpretation of the latter systems and conclude that these uncertainties cloud the impact of projected improvements in the corresponding experimental sensitivities.

Article Text

References (48)

  1. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, Front. Phys. 80, 1 (2000).
  2. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  3. For a recent review, see D. E. Morrissey and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, New J. Phys. 14, 125003 (2012).
  4. J. Shu and Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 091801 (2013).
  5. L. Fromme, S. J. Huber, and M. Seniuch, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2006) 038.
  6. C. Cheung and Y. Zhang, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 002.
  7. J. Engel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and U. van Kolck, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 21 (2013).
  8. T. Fukuyama, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27, 1230015 (2012).
  9. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 318, 119 (2005).
  10. W. Bernreuther and M. Suzuki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63, 313 (1991); 64, 633(E) (1992).
  11. J. Baron et al. (ACME Collaboration), Science 343, 269 (2014).
  12. K. Kumar, Z.-T. Lu, and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, arXiv:1312.5416.
  13. S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1958 (1977).
  14. A. J. Buras, G. Isidori, and P. Paradisi, Phys. Lett. B 694, 402 (2011).
  15. J. M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, and M. Trott, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2011) 089.
  16. M. Jung and A. Pich, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 076.
  17. E. Accomando, A. G. Akeroyd, E. Akhmetzyanova, J. Albert, A. Alves, N. Amapane, M. Aoki, G. Azuelos et al., arXiv:hep-ph/0608079.
  18. B. Grzadkowski, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 105.
  19. T. D. Lee, Phys. Rep. 9C, 143 (1974).
  20. Y. B. Zeldovich, I. Y. Kobzarev, and L. B. Okun, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 67, 3 (1974) [Sov. Phys. JETP 40, 1 (1974)].
  21. A. W. El Kaffas, P. Osland, and O. M. Ogreid, Phys. Rev. D 76, 095001 (2007).
  22. T. Hayashi, Y. Koide, M. Matsuda, and M. Tanimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 91, 915 (1994).
  23. H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and T. Sterling, Nucl. Phys. B161, 493 (1979).
  24. ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2013-034.
  25. CMS Collaboration, Reports Nos. CMS-HIG-13-001, No. CMS-HIG-13-002, No. CMS-HIG-13-004; V. Dutta, Proceedings of Moriond 2013, https://indico.in2p3.fr/getFile.py/access?contribId=57&sessionId=6&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=7411; G. Gomez-Ceballos, Proceedings of Moriond 2013, https://indico.in2p3.fr/getFile.py/access?contribId=16&sessionId=6&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=7411.
  26. A. Freitas and P. Schwaller, Phys. Rev. D 87, 055014 (2013).
  27. A. Celis, V. Ilisie, and A. Pich, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 053.
  28. A. Djouadi and G. Moreau, arXiv:1303.6591.
  29. W.-F. Chang, W.-P. Pan, and F. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 88, 033004 (2013).
  30. W. Dekens and J. de Vries, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 149.
  31. J. Hisano, K. Tsumura, and M. J. S. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 713, 473 (2012).
  32. G. Degrassi, E. Franco, S. Marchetti, and L. Silvestrini, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2005) 044.
  33. V. D. Barger, A. K. Das, and C. Kao, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7099 (1997).
  34. G. Boyd, A. K. Gupta, S. P. Trivedi, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 241, 584 (1990).
  35. C. A. Baker, D. D. Doyle, P. Geltenbort, K. Green, M. G. D. van der Grinten, P. G. Harris, P. Iaydjiev, S. N. Ivanov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 131801 (2006).
  36. V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, J. S. M. Ginges, and M. G. Kozlov, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012111 (2002).
  37. W. C. Griffith, M. D. Swallows, T. H. Loftus, M. V. Romalis, B. R. Heckel, and E. N. Fortson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 101601 (2009).
  38. W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, Nucl. Phys. B801, 81 (2008).
  39. T. Hermann, M. Misiak, and M. Steinhauser, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 036.
  40. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012).
  41. S. Ipek, Phys. Rev. D 89, 073012 (2014).
  42. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2333 (1989); D. A. Dicus, Phys. Rev. D 41, 999 (1990).
  43. S. M. Barr and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 21 (1990); 65, 2920(E) (1990).
  44. J. F. Gunion and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. B 248, 170 (1990).
  45. D. Chang, W.-Y. Keung, and T. C. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 43, R14 (1991).
  46. T. Abe, J. Hisano, T. Kitahara, and K. Tobioka, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 106.
  47. D. Chang, W.-Y. Keung, and A. Pilaftsis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 900 (1999); 83, 3972(E) (1999).
  48. D. Chang, W.-F. Chang, and W.-Y. Keung, Phys. Lett. B 478, 239 (2000); A. Pilaftsis, 471, 174 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation