- Access by Xinjiang University
Discovering charged Higgs bosons in the plus dark vector boson decay mode
Phys. Rev. D 89, 115008 – Published 12 June, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115008
Abstract
In two-Higgs doublet extensions of the Standard Model, flavor-changing neutral current constraints can be addressed by introducing a gauge symmetry, under which the Higgs doublets carry different charges. That scenario implies the presence of a vertex at tree level. For the light “dark” model () with , such a coupling leads to the dominant decay mode (for ), rather than the usual type I model decay , for a broad range of parameters. We find that current analyses do not place significant bounds on this scenario. Over much of the parameter space considered, the decay of a pair-produced () into () provides the dominant production. Analysis of available LHC data can likely cover significant ranges of our parameters, if has a branching ratio of . If the decays mainly invisibly then probing the entire relevant parameter space would likely require additional data from future LHC runs. We briefly discuss the phenomenology for .
Article Text
References (30)
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
- S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
- H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 85, 115019 (2012).
- S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1958 (1977).
- J. Gunion, H. Haber, G. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide, (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, 1990).
- G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
- C.-Y. Chen and S. Dawson, Phys. Rev. D 87, 055016 (2013).
- J. F. Gunion, L. Roszkowski, and H. E. Haber, Phys. Lett. B 189, 409 (1987); H. E. Haber and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 35, 2206 (1987); H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Lett. B 387, 341 (1996); For recent work in this direction, see P. Ko, Y. Omura, and C. Yu, 717, 202 (2012); J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 016.
- B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
- N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014 (2009).
- P. Fayet, Nucl. Phys. B347, 743 (1990).
- M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095002 (2009).
- H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 031802 (2012).
- C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson, and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015018 (2013).
- U. Maitra, B. Mukhopadhyaya, S. Nandi, S. K. Rai, and A. Shivaji, Phys. Rev. D 89, 055024 (2014).
- H.-S. Lee and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115009 (2013).
- R. Dermisek, J. P. Hall, E. Lunghi, and S. Shin, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 140.
- B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 80, 095024 (2009); P. deNiverville, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, 84, 075020 (2011); P. deNiverville, D. McKeen, and A. Ritz, 86, 035022 (2012); R. Dharmapalan et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), arXiv:1211.2258.
- E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114015 (2013); M. D. Diamond and P. Schuster, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 221803 (2013).
- A. Calderon (ATLAS and CMS Collaborations), arXiv:1301.1158.
- M. Klasen, K. Kovarik, P. Nason, and C. Weydert, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2088 (2012).
- X. Gong, Z.-G. Si, S. Yang, and Y.-j. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 87, 035014 (2013).
- R. Enberg, J. Rathsman, and G. Wouda, arXiv:1311.4367.
- H.-S. Lee (private communication); K. Kong, H.-S. Lee, and M. Park, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074007 (2014).
- ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2013-037.
- S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2677 (2013).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 719, 299 (2013).
- H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, I. Lewis, and W. J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015022 (2013).
- D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori, P. Jaiswal, A. Katz, T. Liu, Z. Liu, and D. McKeen et al., arXiv:1312.4992.
- A. Alves, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 063.