- Access by Xinjiang University
Nonlinear matter bispectrum in general relativity
Phys. Rev. D 89, 103523 – Published 21 May, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103523
Abstract
We show that the relativistic effects are negligibly small in the nonlinear density and velocity bispectra. Although the nonlinearities of the Einstein equation introduce additional nonlinear terms to the Newtonian fluid equations, the corrections to the bispectrum only show up on superhorizon scales. We show this with the next-to-leading order nonlinear bispectrum for a pressureless fluid in a flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker background by calculating the density and velocity fields up to fourth order. We work in the comoving gauge, where the dynamics is identical to the Newtonian up to second order. We also discuss the leading order matter bispectrum in various gauges, and show yet another relativistic effect near horizon scales that the matter bispectrum strongly depends on the gauge choice.
Article Text
References (25)
- C. L. Bennett et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 20 (2013); G. Hinshaw et al. (WMAP Collaboration), 208, 19 (2013).
- P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv:1303.5062; (Planck Collaboration), arXiv:1303.5076.
- A. Kogut, D. J. Fixsen, D. T. Chuss, J. Dotson, E. Dwek, M. Halpern, G. F. Hinshaw, S. M. Meyer et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2011) 025.
- P. André et al. (PRISM Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2014) 006.
- T. Matsumura, Y. Akiba, J. Borrill, Y. Chinone, M. Dobbs, H. Fuke, A. Ghribi, M. Hasegawa et al., arXiv:1311.2847.
- L. Anderson et al. (BOSS Collaboration), arXiv:1312.4877.
- C. Blake, E. Kazin, F. Beutler, T. Davis, D. Parkinson, S. Brough, M. Colless, C. Contreras et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418, 1707 (2011).
- S. de la Torre, L. Guzzo, J. A. Peacock, E. Branchini, A. Iovino, B. R. Granett, U. Abbas, C. Adami et al., arXiv:1303.2622.
- http://www.hetdex.org
- http://desi.lbl.gov.
- http://www.lsst.org/lsst/
- http://sci.esa.int/euclid/
- For a recent collection of reviews, see e.g., Classical Quantum Gravity 27 (2010); Adv. Astron. 2010 (2010).
- B. Jain and E. Bertschinger, Astrophys. J. 431, 495 (1994); D. Jeong and E. Komatsu, 651, 619 (2006).
- D. Jeong, J. O. Gong, H. Noh, and J. c. Hwang, Astrophys. J. 727, 22 (2011).
- F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gaztanaga, and R. Scoccimarro, Phys. Rep. 367, 1 (2002).
- D. H. Weinberg, M. J. Mortonson, D. J. Eisenstein, C. Hirata, A. G. Riess, and E. Rozo, Phys. Rep. 530, 87 (2013).
- J.-c. Hwang, H. Noh, and J.-O. Gong, Astrophys. J. 752, 50 (2012).
- J. Yoo, A. L. Fitzpatrick, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D 80, 083514 (2009); C. Bonvin and R. Durrer, 84, 063505 (2011); A. Challinor and A. Lewis, 84, 043516 (2011); D. Jeong, F. Schmidt, and C. M. Hirata, 85, 023504 (2012).
- H. Noh and J. c. Hwang, Phys. Rev. D 69, 104011 (2004).
- R. L. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1997 (2008).
- J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1882 (1980).
- R. Scoccimarro, Astrophys. J. 487, 1 (1997).
- E. Komatsu et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 18 (2011).
- N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, O. Pantano, and A. Riotto, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 124009 (2010); G. Rigopoulos and W. Valkenburg, arXiv:1308.0057.