Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Use of energy loss mechanisms to constrain Lorentz invariance violations

Diego Mazón*

  • 2150 W 39th Avenue Vancouver, British Columbia V6M1T5, Canada

  • *dmazon@unizar.es dg.mazon@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 89, 056012 – Published 20 March, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.056012

Abstract

In light of recent and probably incoming observations of very high energy astroparticles, such as those reported by the IceCube collaboration, we readdress the energy loss mechanism by Lorentz violating particles. We analytically show that Cohen–Glashow’s formula for energy loss is connected with a Poisson distribution for the number of decays, for which the large fluctuations prevent placing bounds on Lorentz invariance violations. However, this model ignores the sharp change in the decay width after each process. We propose replacing Poisson statistics with a new distribution that takes this into account. We study the average final energy and its fluctuations according to the new statistics, contrasting it with Cohen–Glashow’s result, and discussing the reliability of energy loss mechanisms to constrain violations of Lorentz invariance.

Article Text

References (24)

  1. V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D 39, 683 (1989).
  2. N. E. Mavromatos, Proc. Sci., QG-PH (2007) 027.
  3. C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 12 (2005); 14, 3 (2011).
  4. S. Liberati, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 133001 (2013).
  5. G. Amelino-Camelia, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 5 (2013).
  6. D. Mattingly, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 5 (2005).
  7. L. J. Garay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10, 145 (1995).
  8. S. Hossenfelder, Living Rev. Relativity 16, 2 (2013).
  9. J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, and M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B241, 381 (1984).
  10. F. Mercati, D. Mazon, G. Amelino-Camelia, J. M. Carmona, J. L. Cortes, J. Indurain, C. Laemmerzahl, and G. M. Tino, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 215003 (2010).
  11. I. Ruo Berchera, I. P. Degiovanni, S. Olivares, and M. Genovese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213601 (2013).
  12. L. Gonzalez-Mestres, arXiv:physics/9705031.
  13. S. R. Coleman and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 59, 116008 (1999).
  14. R. Aloisio, P. Blasi, P. L. Ghia, and A. F. Grillo, Phys. Rev. D 62, 053010 (2000).
  15. W. Bietenholz, Phys. Rep. 505, 145 (2011).
  16. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 021103 (2013).
  17. M. G. Aartsen et al. (IceCube Collaboration), Science 342, 1242856 (2013).
  18. E. Borriello, S. Chakraborty, A. Mirizzi, and P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. D 87, 116009 (2013).
  19. F. W. Stecker, arXiv:1306.6095.
  20. J. S. Diaz, A. Kostelecky, and M. Mewes, arXiv:1308.6344.
  21. A. G. Cohen and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181803 (2011).
  22. J. M. Carmona, J. L. Cortes, and D. Mazon, Phys. Rev. D 85, 113001 (2012).
  23. L. Maccione, S. Liberati, and D. M. Mattingly, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2013) 039.
  24. R. Cowsik, T. Madziwa-Nussinov, S. Nussinov, and U. Sarkar, Phys. Rev. D 86, 045024 (2012).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation