- Access by Xinjiang University
Predictive model of radiative neutrino masses
Phys. Rev. D 89, 053004 – Published 11 March, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.053004
Abstract
We present a simple and predictive model of radiative neutrino masses. It is a special case of the Zee model which introduces two Higgs doublets and a charged singlet. We impose a family-dependent symmetry acting on the leptons, which reduces the number of parameters describing neutrino oscillations to four. A variety of predictions follow: the hierarchy of neutrino masses must be inverted; the lightest neutrino mass is extremely small and calculable; one of the neutrino mixing angles is determined in terms of the other two; the phase parameters take -conserving values with ; and the effective mass in neutrinoless double beta decay lies in a narrow range, . The ratio of vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, , is determined to be either 1.9 or 0.19 from neutrino oscillation data. Flavor-conserving and flavor-changing couplings of the Higgs doublets are also determined from neutrino data. The nonstandard neutral Higgs bosons, if they are moderately heavy, would decay dominantly into and with prescribed branching ratios. Observable rates for the decays and are predicted if these scalars have masses in the range of 150–500 GeV.
Article Text
References (19)
- A. Zee, Phys. Lett. 93B, 389 (1980); 95B, 461 (1980).
- L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. B175, 93 (1980).
- S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1958 (1977).
- See, e.g., A. Y. Smirnov and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1665 (1997); C. Jarlskog, M. Matsuda, S. Skadhauge, and M. Tanimoto, Phys. Lett. B 449, 240 (1999); P. H. Frampton and S. L. Glashow, 461, 95 (1999).
- Y. Koide, Phys. Rev. D 64, 077301 (2001); X.-G. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 34, 371 (2004).
- A. Zee, Nucl. Phys. B264, 99 (1986); K. S. Babu, Phys. Lett. B 203, 132 (1988).
- K. S. Babu and C. Macesanu, Phys. Rev. D 67, 073010 (2003); M. Nebot, J. F. Oliver, D. Palao, and A. Santamaria, 77, 093013 (2008); D. Aristizabal Sierra and M. Hirsch, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2006) 052; E. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 73, 077301 (2006); M. Aoki, S. Kanemura, and O. Seto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 051805 (2009); K. S. Babu and J. Julio, Nucl. Phys. B841, 130 (2010); F. Bonnet, M. Hirsch, T. Ota, and W. Winter, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 153; A. Aranda, C. Bonilla, and A. D. Rojas, Phys. Rev. D 85, 036004 (2012); M. Gustafsson, J. M. No, and M. A. Rivera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 211802 (2013); P. W. Angel, N. L. Rodd, and R. R. Volkas, Phys. Rev. D 87, 073007 (2013); P. W. Angel, Y. Cai, N. L. Rodd, M. A. Schmidt, and R. R. Volkas, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 118.
- L. M. Krauss and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1221 (1989).
- X.-G. He and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D 68, 037302 (2003); W. Rodejohann, Phys. Lett. B 579, 127 (2004); B. Brahmachari and S. Choubey, 642, 495 (2006); T. Fukuyama, H. Sugiyama, and K. Tsumura, Phys. Rev. D 83, 056016 (2011).
- M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J. Salvado, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2012) 123.
- G. L. Fogli, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo, and A. M. Rotunno, Phys. Rev. D 86, 013012 (2012).
- J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, Phys. Rev. D 67, 075019 (2003); for a review of general two Higgs doublet models, see G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
- J. Beringer et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001 (2012).
- J. Adam et al. (MEG Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 201801 (2013).
- T. Hermann, M. Misiak, and M. Steinhauser, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 036.
- Z.-z. Xing, H. Zhang, and S. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 77, 113016 (2008); K. S. Babu, arXiv:0910.2948.
- A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, and M. Spira, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108, 56 (1998).
- LHC Cross Section Working Group, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCPhysics/CrossSections.
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 138.