Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Up-shot of inelastic down-scattering at CDMS-Si

Mads T. Frandsen* and Ian M. Shoemaker

  • CP3-Origins and Danish Institute for Advanced Study (DIAS), University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark

  • *frandsen@cp3-origins.net
  • shoemaker@cp3-origins.net

Phys. Rev. D 89, 051701(R) – Published 4 March, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.051701

Abstract

We study dark matter that inelastically scatters and deexcites in direct detection experiments, as an interpretation of the CDMS-Si events in light of the recent LUX data. The constraints from LUX and XENON10 require the mass splitting between the DM excited and deexcited states to be |δ|50keV. At the same time, the CDMS-Si data themselves do not allow for a consistent DM interpretation for mass splittings larger than |δ|200keV. We find that a low-threshold analysis will be needed to rule out this interpretation of the CDMS-Si events. In a simple model with a kinetically mixed dark photon, we show that the CDMS-Si rate and the thermal relic abundance can both be accommodated.

Article Text

References (33)

  1. R. Agnese et al. (CDMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 251301 (2013).
  2. M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 84, 085008 (2011).
  3. M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. D 85, 113016 (2012).
  4. M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, arXiv:1311.5764.
  5. M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, S. Sarkar, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 023.
  6. J. Angle et al. (XENON10 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 051301 (2011).
  7. E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 181301 (2012).
  8. D. P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 76, 083519 (2007).
  9. B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115019 (2009).
  10. P. W. Graham, R. Harnik, S. Rajendran, and P. Saraswat, Phys. Rev. D 82, 063512 (2010).
  11. A. Kurylov and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 69, 063503 (2004).
  12. F. Giuliani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 101301 (2005).
  13. S. Chang, J. Liu, A. Pierce, N. Weiner, and I. Yavin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2010) 018.
  14. J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia, and D. Sanford, Phys. Lett. B 703, 124 (2011).
  15. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), arXiv:1310.8214.
  16. M. I. Gresham and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 89, 016017 (2014).
  17. E. Del Nobile, G. B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, and J.-H. Huh, arXiv:1311.4247.
  18. V. Cirigliano, M. L. Graesser, G. Ovanesyan, and I. M. Shoemaker, arXiv:1311.5886.
  19. N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014 (2009).
  20. R. Essig, J. Kaplan, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, arXiv:1004.0691.
  21. M. McCullough and L. Randall, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 058.
  22. E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 84, 052003 (2011).
  23. D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 704, 111 (2013).
  24. R. Gaitskell and D. McKinsey (LUX Collaboration), LUX First Results, http://lux.brown.edu/LUX\_dark\_matter/Talks.html.
  25. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), arXiv:1310.6688.
  26. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043502 (2001).
  27. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 124, 197 (2003).
  28. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 72, 063509 (2005).
  29. Y. Cui, D. E. Morrissey, D. Poland, and L. Randall, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 076.
  30. M. Baumgart, C. Cheung, J. T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang, and I. Yavin, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 014.
  31. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. D 78, 115012 (2008).
  32. K. Arisaka, P. Beltrame, C. Ghag, K. Lung, and P. R. Scovell, Astropart. Phys. 37, 51 (2012).
  33. P. J. Fox, G. Jung, P. Sorensen, and N. Weiner, arXiv:1401.0216.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation