- Rapid Communication
- Access by Xinjiang University
Up-shot of inelastic down-scattering at CDMS-Si
Phys. Rev. D 89, 051701(R) – Published 4 March, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.051701
Abstract
We study dark matter that inelastically scatters and deexcites in direct detection experiments, as an interpretation of the CDMS-Si events in light of the recent LUX data. The constraints from LUX and XENON10 require the mass splitting between the DM excited and deexcited states to be . At the same time, the CDMS-Si data themselves do not allow for a consistent DM interpretation for mass splittings larger than . We find that a low-threshold analysis will be needed to rule out this interpretation of the CDMS-Si events. In a simple model with a kinetically mixed dark photon, we show that the CDMS-Si rate and the thermal relic abundance can both be accommodated.
Article Text
References (33)
- R. Agnese et al. (CDMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 251301 (2013).
- M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 84, 085008 (2011).
- M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, Phys. Rev. D 85, 113016 (2012).
- M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, arXiv:1311.5764.
- M. T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, S. Sarkar, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2013) 023.
- J. Angle et al. (XENON10 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 051301 (2011).
- E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 181301 (2012).
- D. P. Finkbeiner and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 76, 083519 (2007).
- B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, Phys. Rev. D 79, 115019 (2009).
- P. W. Graham, R. Harnik, S. Rajendran, and P. Saraswat, Phys. Rev. D 82, 063512 (2010).
- A. Kurylov and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 69, 063503 (2004).
- F. Giuliani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 101301 (2005).
- S. Chang, J. Liu, A. Pierce, N. Weiner, and I. Yavin, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2010) 018.
- J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia, and D. Sanford, Phys. Lett. B 703, 124 (2011).
- D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), arXiv:1310.8214.
- M. I. Gresham and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D 89, 016017 (2014).
- E. Del Nobile, G. B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, and J.-H. Huh, arXiv:1311.4247.
- V. Cirigliano, M. L. Graesser, G. Ovanesyan, and I. M. Shoemaker, arXiv:1311.5886.
- N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 79, 015014 (2009).
- R. Essig, J. Kaplan, P. Schuster, and N. Toro, arXiv:1004.0691.
- M. McCullough and L. Randall, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 058.
- E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 84, 052003 (2011).
- D. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 704, 111 (2013).
- R. Gaitskell and D. McKinsey (LUX Collaboration), LUX First Results, http://lux.brown.edu/LUX\_dark\_matter/Talks.html.
- A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), arXiv:1310.6688.
- D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043502 (2001).
- D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 124, 197 (2003).
- D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 72, 063509 (2005).
- Y. Cui, D. E. Morrissey, D. Poland, and L. Randall, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 076.
- M. Baumgart, C. Cheung, J. T. Ruderman, L.-T. Wang, and I. Yavin, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 014.
- M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Rev. D 78, 115012 (2008).
- K. Arisaka, P. Beltrame, C. Ghag, K. Lung, and P. R. Scovell, Astropart. Phys. 37, 51 (2012).
- P. J. Fox, G. Jung, P. Sorensen, and N. Weiner, arXiv:1401.0216.