- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Dark side of the Universe after Planck data

Cheng Cheng1,2,* and Qing-Guo Huang1,†

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China
  • 2University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

  • *chcheng@itp.ac.cn
  • †huangqg@itp.ac.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 89, 043003 – Published 10 February, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.043003

Abstract

Recently released Planck data imply a smaller Hubble constant H0 than that from the Hubble Space Telescope project (HST) and a larger percentage of the matter components Ωm compared to the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) in the Λ cold dark matter (CDM) model. In this paper we found that even though the tension on H0 between Planck and HST can be relaxed if the dark radiation is introduced [ΔNeff=0.536−0.224+0.229 at 68% CL from the data sets of Planck+WMAP polarization (WP)+baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO)+the combination of supernova Union2.1 compilation of 580 Supernovae (Union2.1)+HST], Ωm from Planck is still not nicely compatible with that from SNLS. The tensions between Planck and other astrophysical data sets can be significantly relaxed in the wCDM model, and the combination of these data sets prefers a phantomlike dark energy at more than 95% CL: w=−1.15±0.07 and w=−1.16±0.06 at 68% CL from Planck+WP+BAO+Union2.1+HST and Planck+WP+BAO+SNLS+HST, respectively. From the statistical point of view, there is no evidence for a time-evolving equation of state (Δχ2=−0.3 compared to a constant equation of state for the combination of Planck+WP+BAO+SNLS+HST).

View figure in article

Article Text

References (26)

  1. A. G. Riess et al. (Supernova Search Team Collaboration), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
  2. S. Perlmutter et al. (Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
  3. G. Hinshaw et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 19 (2013).
  4. Z. Hou, C. L. Reichardt, K. T. Story, B. Follin, R. Keisler, K. A. Aird, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem et al., arXiv:1212.6267.
  5. W. J. Percival et al. (SDSS Collaboration), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401, 2148 (2010); N. Padmanabhan, X. Xu, D. J. Eisenstein, R. Scalzo, A. J. Cuesta, K. T. Mehta, and E. Kazin, 427, 2132 (2012); C. Blake, E. Kazin, F. Beutler, T. Davis, D. Parkinson, S. Brough, M. Colless, C. Contreras et al., 418, 1707 (2011); L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, D. Bizyaev, M. Blanton, A. S. Bolton, J. Brinkmann, J. R. Brownstein et al., 427, No. 4, 3435 (2013); F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D. H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell, Q. Parker, W. Saunders et al., 416, 3017 (2011).
  6. A. Conley, J. Guy, M. Sullivan, N. Regnault, P. Astier, C. Balland, S. Basa, R. G. Carlberg et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 1 (2011).
  7. N. Suzuki, D. Rubin, C. Lidman, G. Aldering, R. Amanullah, K. Barbary, L. F. Barrientos, J. Botyanszki et al., Astrophys. J. 746, 85 (2012).
  8. A. G. Riess, L. Macri, S. Casertano, H. Lampeitl, H. C. Ferguson, A. V. Filippenko, S. W. Jha, W. Li, and R. Chornock, Astrophys. J. 730, 119 (2011); A. G. Riess, L. Macri, S. Casertano, H. Lampeitl, H. C. Ferguson, A. V. Filippenko, S. W. Jha, W. Li, R. Chornock, and J. M. Silverman, 732, 129(E) (2011).
  9. P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv:1303.5076.
  10. A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000); C. Howlett, A. Lewis, A. Hall, and A. Challinor, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2012) 027, which uses CAMB (http://camb.info).
  11. A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Phys. Rev. D 66, 103511 (2002); A. Lewis, 87, 103529 (2013); cosmomc, http://cosmologist.info/cosmomc.
  12. P. A. R. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv:1303.5075.
  13. N. Said, E. Di Valentino, and M. Gerbino, Phys. Rev. D 88, 023513 (2013).
  14. M. Archidiacono, E. Giusarma, S. Hannestad, and O. Mena, arXiv:1307.0637.
  15. L. Verde, S. M. Feeney, D. J. Mortlock, and H. V. Peiris, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2013) 013.
  16. Y. Zhang and Y. Gong, arXiv:1306.6663.
  17. E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, and O. Mena, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2013) 018.
  18. M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213 (2001); E. V. Linder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003).
  19. S.-N. Zhang and Y.-Z. Ma, arXiv:1303.6124 [Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published)].
  20. M. Li, X.-D. Li, Y.-Z. Ma, X. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2013) 021.
  21. V. Marra, L. Amendola, I. Sawicki, and W. Valkenburg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 241305 (2013).
  22. G.-B. Zhao, R. G. Crittenden, L. Pogosian, and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 171301 (2012).
  23. S. ’i. Nojiri and E. N. Saridakis, Astrophys. Space Sci. 347, No. 1, 221 (2013).
  24. P. Di Bari, S. F. King, and A. Merle, Phys. Lett. B 724, 77 (2013).
  25. X.-D. Li, S. Wang, Q.-G. Huang, X. Zhang, and M. Li, Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron. 55, 1330 (2012).
  26. W.-S. Zhang, C. Cheng, Q.-G. Huang, M. Li, S. Li, X.-D. Li, and S. Wang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 55, 2244 (2012).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 89, 043003– Published 10 February, 2014
  • Received 17 October 2013

© 2014 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation