Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Generating nonperturbative physics from perturbation theory

Gerald V. Dunne1 and Mithat Ünsal2

  • 1Physics Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, SFSU, San Francisco, California 94132, USA

Phys. Rev. D 89, 041701(R) – Published 25 February, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.041701

Abstract

In a large variety of quantum mechanical systems, we show that the full nonperturbative expression for energy eigenvalues, containing all orders of perturbative, nonperturbative, and quasi-zero-mode terms, may be generated directly from the perturbative expansion about the perturbative vacuum, combined with a single global boundary condition. This provides a dramatic realization of the principle of “resurgence,” that the fluctuations about different semiclassical saddle points are related to one another in a precise quantitative manner. The analysis of quantum mechanics also generalizes to certain calculable regimes of quantum field theory.

Article Text

References (26)

  1. C. M. Bender and T. T. Wu, Phys. Rev. 184, 1231 (1969); Phys. Rev. D 7, 1620 (1973).
  2. L. N. Lipatov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 72, 411 (1977) [Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 216 (1977)].
  3. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University, New York, 2002).
  4. J. Zinn-Justin and U. D. Jentschura, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 313, 197 (2004); 313, 269 (2004); Phys. Lett. B 596, 138 (2004).
  5. P. C. Argyres and M. Ünsal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 121601 (2012); J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 063.
  6. G. V. Dunne and M. Ünsal, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2012) 170; Phys. Rev. D 87, 025015 (2013).
  7. A. Cherman, D. Dorigoni, G. V. Dunne, and M. Unsal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 021601 (2014).
  8. M. Ünsal and L. G. Yaffe, Phys. Rev. D 78, 065035 (2008).
  9. M. Mariño, R. Schiappa, and M. Weiss, Comm. Number Theor. Phys. 2, 349 (2008); M. Mariño, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2008) 114; J. Phys. A 44, 463001 (2011).
  10. M. Mariño, arXiv:1206.6272.
  11. S. Pasquetti and R. Schiappa, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 11, 351 (2010); I. Aniceto, R. Schiappa, and M. Vonk, Comm. Number Theor. Phys. 6, 339 (2012); I. Aniceto and R. Schiappa, arXiv:1308.1115; R. C. Santamara, J. D. Edelstein, R. Schiappa, and M. Vonk, arXiv:1308.1695.
  12. D. Krefl, arXiv:1311.0584.
  13. E. Brézin, G. Parisi, and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. D 16, 408 (1977).
  14. M. Stone and J. Reeve, Phys. Rev. D 18, 4746 (1978).
  15. E. B. Bogomolny, Phys. Lett. 91B, 431 (1980).
  16. J. Zinn-Justin, Nucl. Phys. B192, 125 (1981); B218, 333 (1983); J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 25, 549 (1984).
  17. S. C. Miller and R. H. Good, Phys. Rev. 91, 174 (1953).
  18. NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, http://dlmf.nist.gov/.
  19. G. V. Dunne and M. Ünsal, arXiv:1401.5202.
  20. G. Álvarez, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 45, 3095 (2004).
  21. J. Zinn-Justin, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 22, 511 (1981).
  22. C. F. Wöhler and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Lett. B 333, 467 (1994).
  23. R. Dingle and H. Müller-Kirsten, J. Reine Angew. Math. 211, 11 (1962).
  24. Note that the imaginary term is independent of the parity factor ε for the DW and of the Bloch angle θ for SG; this is crucial because these imaginary terms must cancel against terms coming from Borel summation of perturbation theory, and perturbation theory is independent of these parity and Bloch angle parameters.

  25. M. V. Berry and C. J. Howls, Proc. R. Soc. A 434, 657 (1991).
  26. G. Başar, G. V. Dunne, and M. Ünsal, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 041.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation