- Access by Xinjiang University
Compressed supersymmetry at 14 TeV LHC
Phys. Rev. D 89, 037702 – Published 19 February, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.037702
Abstract
In this work we study the collider phenomenology of a compressed supersymmetric model with the gluino () and the lightest neutralino (). All other sparticles are assumed to be heavy. We consider gluino pair production at the 14 TeV LHC and present the mass reach of the gluino as a function of mass splitting between the gluino and the lightest neutralino. We find that the gluino mass below 1 TeV can be excluded at 95% C.L. with an integrated luminosity of for the extreme degenerate case where the mass separation between the gluino and the lightest neutralino is about 20 GeV. On the other hand, the lower bound on the mass of the gluino increases to 1.2–1.3 TeV if the mass splitting between the gluino and is about 200 GeV. This result shows that for a degenerate gluino, the current mass limit may approximately extend up to 400–500 GeV at the 14 TeV LHC.
Article Text
References (31)
- G. L. Kane, C. F. Kolda, L. Roszkowski, and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6173 (1994).
- S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2568 (2013).
- ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2013-047.
- ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2013-002.
- D. S. Alves, E. Izaguirre, and J. G. Wacker, Phys. Lett. B 702, 64 (2011).
- T. J. LeCompte and S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 84, 015004 (2011).
- T. J. LeCompte and S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 85, 035023 (2012).
- E. Alvarez and Y. Bai, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 003.
- H. K. Dreiner, M. Kramer, and J. Tattersall, Europhys. Lett. 99, 61001 (2012).
- B. Bhattacherjee and K. Ghosh, arXiv:1207.6289.
- H. Dreiner, M. Krmer, and J. Tattersall, Phys. Rev. D 87, 035006 (2013).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 012008 (2013).
- S. Raby, Phys. Lett. B 422, 158 (1998).
- A. Mafi and S. Raby, Phys. Rev. D 63, 055010 (2001).
- H. Murayama, Y. Nomura, S. Shirai, and K. Tobioka, Phys. Rev. D 86, 115014 (2012).
- K. Nakayama and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 722, 107 (2013).
- S. Krippendorf, H. P. Nilles, M. Ratz, and M. W. Winkler, Phys. Rev. D 88, 035022 (2013).
- P. Ade et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv:1303.5076.
- S. Profumo and C. Yaguna, Phys. Rev. D 69, 115009 (2004).
- J. Alwall, K. Hiramatsu, M. M. Nojiri, and Y. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 151802 (2009).
- A. Djouadi, M. Muhlleitner, and M. Spira, Acta Phys. Pol. B 38, 635 (2007).
- G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149, 103 (2002).
- J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
- T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026.
- M. L. Mangano, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini, and M. Treccani, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2007) 013.
- S. Ovyn, X. Rouby, and V. Lemaitre, arXiv:0903.2225.
- W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, and M. Spira, arXiv:hep-ph/9611232.
- “Hathor-hadronic top and heavy quarks cross section calculator,” https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/Sandbox/CrossSectionsCalculationTool.
- S. Catani, L. Cieri, G. Ferrera, D. de Florian, and M. Grazzini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 082001 (2009).
- G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), arXiv:0901.0512.
- T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng, and B. A. Dobrescu, Phys. Rev. D 64, 035002 (2001).