Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Complete spectral analysis of the Jackiw-Rebbi model, including its zero mode

F. Charmchi* and S. S. Gousheh

  • Department of Physics, Shahid Beheshti University G.C., Evin, Tehran 19839, Iran

  • *f_charmchi@sbu.ac.ir
  • ss-gousheh@sbu.ac.ir

Phys. Rev. D 89, 025002 – Published 6 January, 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.025002

Abstract

In this paper we present a complete and exact spectral analysis of the (1+1)-dimensional model that Jackiw and Rebbi considered to show that the half-integral fermion numbers are possible due to the presence of an isolated self-charge-conjugate zero mode. The model possesses the charge and particle conjugation symmetries. These symmetries mandate the reflection symmetry of the spectrum about the line E=0. We obtain the bound-state energies and wave functions of the fermion in this model using two different methods, analytically and exactly, for every arbitrary choice of the parameters of the kink, i.e. its value at spatial infinity (θ0) and its scale of variations (μ). Then, we plot the bound-state energies of the fermion as a function of θ0. This graph enables us to consider a process of building up the kink from the trivial vacuum. We can then determine the origin and evolution of the bound-state energy levels during this process. We see that the model has a dynamical mass generation process at the first quantized level and the zero-energy fermionic mode responsible for the fractional fermion number, is always present during the construction of the kink and its origin is very peculiar, indeed. We also observe that, as expected, none of the energy levels cross one another. Moreover, we obtain analytically the continuum scattering wave functions of the fermion and then calculate the phase shifts of these wave functions. Using the information contained in the graphs of the phase shifts and the bound states, we show that our phase shifts are consistent with the weak and strong forms of the Levinson theorem. Finally, using the weak form of the Levinson theorem, we confirm that the number of the zero-energy fermionic modes is exactly one.

Article Text

References (37)

  1. R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976).
  2. R. Jackiw, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 681 (1977).
  3. J. Goldstone and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 986 (1981).
  4. R. MacKenzie and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2194 (1984).
  5. R. MacKenzie and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 30, 2260 (1984).
  6. S. S. Gousheh and R. López-Mobilia, Nucl. Phys. B428, 189 (1994).
  7. L. Shahkarami and S. S. Gousheh, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 116.
  8. Z. Dehghan and S. S. Gousheh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27, 1250093 (2012).
  9. E. R. Bezerra de Mello and A. A. Saharian, Phys. Rev. D 75, 065019 (2007).
  10. E. R. Bezerra de Mello, V. B. Bezerra, A. A. Saharian and A. S. Tarloyan, Phys. Rev. D 78, 105007 (2008).
  11. E. R. Bezerra de Mello and A. A. Saharian, Phys. Rev. D 78, 045021 (2008).
  12. E. R. Bezerra de Mello and A. A. Saharian, J. Phys. A 45, 115002 (2012).
  13. E. R. Bezerra de Mello, A. A. Saharian, and S. V. Abajyan, Classical Quantum Gravity 30, 015002 (2013).
  14. W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979).
  15. W. P. Su and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 738 (1981).
  16. A. Niemi and G. Semenoff, Phys. Rep. 135, 99 (1986).
  17. J. Ruostekoski, J. Javanainen, and G. V. Dunne, Phys. Rev. A 77, 013603 (2008).
  18. M. Rice and E. Mele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1455 (1982).
  19. R. Jackiw and G. Semenoff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 439 (1983).
  20. A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer, and W.-P. Su, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781 (1988).
  21. A. R. Neghabian, Phys. Rev. A 27, 2311 (1983).
  22. Y. Gu, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032116 (2002).
  23. A. I. Milstein, I. S. Terekho, U. D. Jentschura, and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. A 72, 052104 (2005).
  24. R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D 10, 4130 (1974).
  25. R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).
  26. L. E. Gendenshtein, JETP Lett. 38, 356 (1983).
  27. F. Cooper and B. Freedman, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 146, 262 (1983).
  28. F. Cooper, A. Khare, and U. Sukhatme, Phys. Rep. 251, 267 (1995).
  29. G. Junker, Supersymmetric Methods in Quantum and Statistical Physics (Springer, Berlin, 1996).
  30. J. Sadeghi and A. Mohammadi, Eur. Phys. J. C 49, 859 (2007).
  31. A. A. Andrianov and M. V. Loffe, J. Phys. A 45, 503001 (2012).
  32. A. Alonso-lzquierdo, G. M. Guilarte, and M. S. Plyushchay, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 331, 269 (2013).
  33. N. Levinson, Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskab. Mat.-fys. Medd. 25, 1 (1949).
  34. S. S. Gousheh, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032719 (2002).
  35. S. Kutnii, arXiv:1107.1889.
  36. P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953), Vol. II.
  37. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1989).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation