- Access by Xinjiang University
Physical meaning and consequences of the loop infrared divergences in global de Sitter space
Phys. Rev. D 87, 044049 – Published 22 February, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044049
Abstract
Following Krotov and Polyakov [Nucl. Phys. B849, 410 (2011)], we show that in global de Sitter space its isometry is broken by the loop IR divergences for any invariant vacuum state of the massive scalars. We derive a kinetic equation in global de Sitter space that follows from the Dyson-Schwinger equation of the Schwinger-Keldysh diagrammatic technique in the IR limit and allows us to understand the physical meaning and consequences of the loop IR divergences. In many respects, the isometry breaking in global de Sitter space is similar to the one in the contracting Poincaré patch of de Sitter space. Hence, as a warm-up exercise we study the kinetic equation and properties of its solutions in the expanding and contracting Poincaré patches of de Sitter space. Quite unexpectedly, we find that under some initial conditions there is an explosive production of massive particles in the expanding Poincaré patch.
Article Text
References (21)
- E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. D 31, 754 (1985).
- B. Allen, Phys. Rev. D 32, 3136 (1985).
- A. M. Polyakov, arXiv:1209.4135; A. Polyakov, “The Dark and the Red,” http://hep.caltech.edu/ym35/; “Quantum Instability of the de Sitter Space,” (unpublished).
- E. T. Akhmedov and P. Burda, Phys. Rev. D 86, 044031 (2012).
- D. Krotov and A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B849, 410 (2011).
- E. T. Akhmedov, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 066.
- E. T. Akhmedov and P. V. Buividovich, Phys. Rev. D 78, 104005 (2008); E. T. Akhmedov, P. V. Buividovich, and D. A. Singleton, Phys. At. Nucl. 75, 525 (2012).
- D. Marolf, I. A. Morrison, and M. Srednicki, arXiv:1209.6039; D. Marolf and I. A. Morrison, Phys. Rev. D 82, 105032 (2010); Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 3497 (2011); A. Higuchi, D. Marolf, and I. A. Morrison, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084029 (2011); D. Marolf and I. A. Morrison, 84, 044040 (2011).
- E. T. Akhmedov, F. Popov, and V. Slepukhin (unpublished).
- T. Prokopec, N. C. Tsamis, and R. P. Woodard, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 323, 1324 (2008); R. P. Woodard, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 68, 012032 (2007); T. Prokopec, N. C. Tsamis, and R. P. Woodard, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 201 (2007); S.-P. Miao and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. D 74, 044019 (2006); Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 1721 (2006); N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Nucl. Phys. B724, 295 (2005); R. P. Woodard, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 148, 108 (2005); N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Nucl. Phys. B474, 235 (1996); Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 253, 1 (1997); Classical Quantum Gravity 11, 2969 (1994).
- A. D. Dolgov, M. B. Einhorn, and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D 52, 717 (1995).
- I. Antoniadis, P. O. Mazur, and E. Mottola, New J. Phys. 9, 11 (2007); E. Mottola, Phys. Rev. D 33, 1616 (1986); 33, 2136 (1986).
- W. Xue, X. Gao, and R. Brandenberger, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2012) 035; W. Xue, K. Dasgupta, and R. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D 83, 083520 (2011).
- S. B. Giddings and M. S. Sloth, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2010) 015; 01 (2011) 023; A. Riotto and M. S. Sloth, 04 (2008) 030.
- M. van der Meulen and J. Smit, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2007) 023.
- N. Myrhvold, Phys. Rev. D 28, 2439 (1983).
- D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, and N. G. Sanchez, Phys. Rev. D 71, 023509 (2005); D. Boyanovsky and H. J. de Vega, 70, 063508 (2004).
- J. Bros, H. Epstein, M. Gaudin, U. Moschella, and V. Pasquier, Commun. Math. Phys. 295, 261 (2010); J. Bros, H. Epstein, and U. Moschella, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Sect. B 11, 611 (2010); J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2008) 003.
- G. E. Volovik, arXiv:0803.3367; JETP Lett. 90, 1 (2009).
- E. O. Kahya, V. K. Onemli, and R. P. Woodard, Phys. Rev. D 81, 023508 (2010).
- E. T. Akhmedov and S. Guz (unpublished).