- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Creep events and creep noise in gravitational-wave interferometers: Basic formalism and stationary limit

Yuri Levin*

  • Monash Center for Astrophysics, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
  • Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

  • *yuri.levin@monash.edu.au
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 86, 122004 – Published 19 December, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.122004

Abstract

In gravitational-wave interferometers, test masses are suspended on thin fibers which experience considerable tension stress. Sudden microscopic stress release in a suspension fiber, which I call a “creep event,” would excite motion of the test mass that would be coupled to the interferometer’s readout. The random test-mass motion due to a time sequence of creep events is referred to as “creep noise.” In this paper I present an elastodynamic calculation for the test-mass motion due to a creep event. I show that within a simple suspension model, the main coupling to the optical readout occurs via a combination of a “dc” horizontal displacement of the test mass and excitation of the violin and pendulum modes, and not, as was thought previously, via lengthening of the fiber. When the creep events occur sufficiently frequently and their statistics is time independent, the creep noise can be well approximated by a stationary Gaussian random process. I derive the functional form of the creep noise spectral density in this limit, with the restrictive assumption that the creep events are statistically independent from each other.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (37)

  1. B. P. Abbott et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 076901 (2009).
  2. F. Acernese et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 114045 (2008).
  3. H. Luck, Proceedings of the Twelfth Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity, edited by T. Damour, R. T. Jantzen, and R. Ruffini (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010).
  4. K. Arai et al. (TAMA Collaboration), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 120, 032010 (2008).
  5. G. Harry et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084006 (2010).
  6. T. Accadia, in Proceedings of the Rencontres de Moriond Conference, 2011 (unpublished).
  7. J. Abadie et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 173001 (2010).
  8. M. W. Coughlin and J. Harms, arXiv:1202.4826.
  9. Optical Coatings and Thermal Noise in Precision Measurements, edited by G. Harry, T. Bodiya, and R. DeSalvo (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2012).
  10. H. J. Kimble, Y. Levin, A. B. Matsko, K. S. Thorne, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Phys. Rev. D 65, 022002 (2001).
  11. A. Buonanno and Y. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 64, 042006 (2001).

  12. Gravitational-wave interferometers represent a relatively new field and one has to be vigilant for the possibility that an important noise source has been overlooked. As a historical example, thermal noise was thought to be well understood in the 1990s. However, Harry et al. [13] (following an earlier suggestion of Ref. [14]) demonstrated the importance of the coating thermal noise, while Braginsky, Gorodetsky, and Vyatchanin [15] discovered the importance of thermoelastic noise in sapphire test masses. These discoveries then both revolutionized thermal-noise research and changed the projected noise budgets for the interferometers.

  13. G. M. Harry et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 897 (2002).
  14. Y. Levin, Phys. Rev. D 57, 659 (1998).
  15. V. B. Braginsky, M. Gorodetsky, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Phys. Lett. A 264, 1 (1999).
  16. G. Cagnoli, L. Gammaitoni, J. Kovalik, F. Marchesoni, M. Punturo, S. Braccini, R. De Salvo, F. Fidecaro, and G. Losurdo, Phys. Lett. A 237, 21 (1997).
  17. A. Yu. Ageev, I. A. Bilenko, V. B. Braginsky, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Phys. Lett. A 227, 159 (1997).
  18. I. A. Bilenko, A. Yu. Ageev, and V. B. Braginsky, Phys. Lett. A 246, 479 (1998).
  19. A. Gretarsson and P. R. Saulson, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 054502 (2005).
  20. R. DeSalvo, Second Edoardo Amaldi Conference Gravitational Waves, edited by G. Coccia, G. Veneziano, and G. Pizzella (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997), p. 228.
  21. S. Aston et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 235004 (2012).
  22. I. A. Bilenko and S. L. Lourie, Phys. Lett. A 305, 31 (2002).
  23. B. Sorazu, K. A. Strain, I. S. Heng, and R. Kumar, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 155017 (2010).
  24. R. DeSalvo (private communication).
  25. N. Robertson (private communication).
  26. J. D. Achenbach, Reciprocity in Elastodynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003).
  27. Y. Levin and M. van Hoven, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 418, 659 (2011).

  28. Naturally, other time dependencies may also be considered within this formalism.

  29. More precisely, for frequencies such that the corresponding sound waves have a much larger wavelength than the size of V, which is an excellent approximation in our situation.

  30. Strictly speaking, this expression is valid only to zeroth order in m/M at low frequencies, where m and M are the masses of the string and the test mass, respectively. This is of order of 10−4 for LIGO.

  31. This enforces causality of the test-mass response. In case there is no damping, one needs to use the Landau rule when evaluating the inverse Fourier transform: the integration contour should pass under every pole.

  32. R. D. Blandford and K. S. Thorne, Applications of Classical Physics, online course at http://www.pma.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2011 (2011).
  33. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity (Pergamon, Oxford, 1986), 3rd ed.

  34. In real suspension systems, this may not be so.

  35. K. A. Dahmen, Y. Ben-Zion, and J. T. Uhl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 5501D (2009).
  36. G. I. Gonzalez and P. R. Saulson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 207 (1994).
  37. V. B. Braginsky, Y. Levin, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Meas. Sci. Technol. 10, 598 (1999).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 86, 122004– Published 19 December, 2012
  • Received 27 October 2012

© 2012 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation