- Access by Xinjiang University
Quantum astrometric observables: Time delay in classical and quantum gravity
Phys. Rev. D 85, 124014 – Published 7 June, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.124014
Abstract
A class of diffeomorphism-invariant, physical observables, so-called astrometric observables, is introduced. A particularly simple example, the time delay, which expresses the difference between two initially synchronized proper time clocks in relative inertial motion, is analyzed in detail. It is found to satisfy some interesting inequalities related to the causal structure of classical Lorentzian spacetimes. Thus it can serve as a probe of causal structure and, in particular, of violations of causality. A quantum model of this observable as well as the calculation of its variance due to vacuum fluctuations in quantum linearized gravity are sketched. The question of whether the causal inequalities are still satisfied by quantized gravity, which is pertinent to the nature of causality in quantum gravity, is raised, but it is shown that perturbative calculations cannot provide a definite answer. Some potential applications of astrometric observables in quantum gravity are discussed.
See Also
Quantum astrometric observables. II. Time delay in linearized quantum gravity
Article Text
References (47)
- M. H. Soffel, Relativity in Astrometry, Celestial Mechanics and Geodesy, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].
- R. P. Woodard, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 126002 (2009).
- P. G. Bergmann, Rev. Mod. Phys. 33, 510 (1961).
- C. Rovelli, Classical and Quantum Gravity 8, 297 (1991).
- L. Lusanna and M. Pauri, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38, 229 (2006).
- B. Dittrich, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, 6155 (2006).
- J. M. Pons, D. C. Salisbury, and K. A. Sundermeyer, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222, 012018 (2010).
- B. Dittrich and J. Tamborino, Classical Quantum Gravity 24, 757 (2007)
- S. Giddings, D. Marolf, and J. Hartle, Phys. Rev. D 74, 064018 (2006).
- C. Rovelli, Phys. Rev. D 65, 124013 (2002).
- C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004).
- L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 51, 1692 (1995).
- S. Ohlmeyer, Master’s thesis, DESY Hamburg, 1997.
- A. Roura and D. Arteaga (private communication).
- H. Yu and L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 60, 084023 (1999).
- J. Borgman and L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064032 (2004).
- R. T. Thompson and L. H. Ford, Phys. Rev. D 74, 024012 (2006).
- N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 215, 96 (1992).
- R. P. Woodard, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 1984.
- R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984).
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, Course of Theoretical Physics Series, Vol. 2 (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1980), 4th ed.
- W. Pauli, General Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Springer, New York, 1980), original edition from 1933.
- J. Hilgevoord, Am. J. Phys. 70, 301 (2002).
- J. Muga and C. R. Leavens, Phys. Rep. 338, 353 (2000).
- V. S. Olkhovsky, Advances in Mathematical Physics 2009, 859710 (2009).
- R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen, and M. Hoge, Found. Phys. 40, 1368 (2010).
- M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis (Academic Press, New York, 1981).
- D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2885 (1983).
- R. Gambini, R. A. Porto, J. Pullin, and S. Torterolo, Phys. Rev. D 79, 041501 (2009).
- E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, Living Rev. Relativity 14, 7 (2011), http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2011-7.
- E. Göklü, C. Lämmerzahl, A. Camacho, and A. Macias, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 225010 (2009).
- V. B. Braginsky and F. Y. Khalili, Quantum Measurement (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
- H. Salecker and E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 109, 571 (1958).
- B. Bonga and I. Khavkine (unpublished).
- J. A. Wheeler, Geometrodynamics, Topics of Modern Physics, Vol. 1 (Academic Press, London, 1962).
- A. Kent, in Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle: Essays in Honour of Abner Shimony (Springer, New York, 2009) pp. 369–378.
- N. Bohr and L. Rosenfeld, Phys. Rev. 78, 794 (1950).
- P. Bergmann and G. Smith, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 14, 1131 (1982).
- L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995) ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].
- U. Leonhardt, Measuring the Quantum State of Light, Cambridge Studies in Modern Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997).
- G. E. O. Giacaglia, Perturbation Methods in Non-Linear Systems, Applied Mathematical Sciences (Springer, New York, 1972).
- A. A. Abdo et al., Nature (London) 462, 331 (2009).
- G. Amelino-Camelia, J. Ellis, N. E. Mavromatos, D. V. Nanopoulos, and S. Sarkar, Nature (London) 393, 763 (1998).
- S. Hossenfelder and L. Smolin, Phys. Canada 66, 99 (2010), http://www.cap.ca/en/article/phenomenological-quantum-gravity.
- S. Blanes, F. Casas, J. A. Oteo, and J. Ros, Phys. Rep. 470, 151 (2009).
- C. Meusburger, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 055006 (2009).
- S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1973).