- Access by Xinjiang University
Higgs boson decays, baryon number violation, and supersymmetry at the LHC
Phys. Rev. D 85, 115024 – Published 26 June, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.115024
Abstract
Baryon number violating interactions could modify the signatures of supersymmetric models at the Large Hadron Collider. In this article we investigate the predictions for the Higgs mass and the Higgs decays in a simple extension of the minimal supersymmetric standard model where the local baryon and lepton numbers are spontaneously broken at the TeV scale. This theory predicts baryon number violation at the low scale that can change the current LHC bounds on the supersymmetric spectrum. Using the ATLAS and CMS bounds on the Higgs mass we show the constraints on the sfermion masses and show the subsequent predictions for the radiative Higgs decays. We found that the Higgs decay into two photons is suppressed due to the existence of new light leptons. In this theory the stops can be very light in agreement with all experimental bounds, and we make a brief discussion of the possible signals at the LHC.
Article Text
References (33)
- Supersymmetry Searches at CMS, http://cms.web.cern.ch/org/cms-papers-and-results.
- Supersymmetry Searches at ATLAS, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/SupersymmetryPublicResults.
- P. Fileviez Pérez and M. B. Wise, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 068.
- P. Fileviez Perez and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 82, 011901 (2010); 82, 079901(E) (2010). See also 84, 055015 (2011).
- T. R. Dulaney, P. Fileviez Perez, and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 83, 023520 (2011).
- J. Alitti et al. (UA2 Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B400, 3 (1993).
- S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), arXiv:1204.2488.
- P. Langacker, arXiv:0911.4294.
- B. A. Campbell, S. Davidson, J. R. Ellis, and K. A. Olive, Phys. Lett. B 256, 484 (1991).
- B. A. Campbell, S. Davidson, J. R. Ellis, and K. A. Olive, Astropart. Phys. 1, 77 (1992).
- W. Fischler, G. F. Giudice, R. G. Leigh, and S. Paban, Phys. Lett. B 258, 45 (1991).
- H. K. Dreiner and G. G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B410, 188 (1993).
- G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. 76B, 575 (1978).
- J. H. Kuhn and S. Ono, Phys. Lett. 142B, 436 (1984).
- J. T. Goldman and H. Haber, Physica D (Amsterdam) 15, 181 (1985).
- I. I. Y. Bigi, V. S. Fadin, and V. A. Khoze, Nucl. Phys. B377, 461 (1992).
- E. Chikovani, V. Kartvelishvili, R. Shanidze, and G. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6653 (1996).
- K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung, Phys. Rev. D 71, 015015 (2005).
- M. Drees and X. Tata, Phys. Lett. B 252, 695 (1990).
- J. L. Feng and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 58, 035001 (1998).
- Michael D. Litos, Ph.D. thesis, Boston University, 2010.
- J. L. Goity and M. Sher, Phys. Lett. B 346, 69 (1995); 385, 500(E) (1996).
- ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 111803 (2012).
- ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 710, 49 (2012).
- CMS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 710, 26 (2012).
- CMS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 710, 403 (2012).
- CMS physics analysis, https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1429928/files/HIG-12-008-pas.pdf.
- S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, Comput. Phys. Commun. 124, 76 (2000); Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 343 (1999); G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich, and G. Weiglein, 28, 133 (2003); M. Frank, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 047.
- P. Fileviez Perez, Phys. Lett. B 711, 353 (2012).
- A. Djouadi, V. Driesen, W. Hollik, and J. I. Illana, Eur. Phys. J. C 1, 149 (1998).
- K. Ishiwata and M. B. Wise, Phys. Rev. D 84, 055025 (2011).
- M. Spira, Fortschr. Phys. 46, 203 (1998).
- A. Djouadi, Phys. Rep. 457, 1 (2008).