Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

MSSM Higgs bosons at the LHC

Neil Christensen1, Tao Han1, and Shufang Su2

  • 1Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center, Department of Physics Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, 3941 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210081, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

Phys. Rev. D 85, 115018 – Published 22 June, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.115018

Abstract

The recent results on Higgs boson searches from LHC experiments provide significant guidance in exploring the minimal supersymmetric (SUSY) standard model (MSSM) Higgs sector. If we accept the existence of a SM-like Higgs boson in the mass window of 123 GeV–127 GeV as indicated by the observed γγ events, there are two distinct mass regions (in mA) left in the MSSM Higgs sector: (a) the lighter CP-even Higgs boson being SM-like and the non-SM-like Higgs bosons all heavy and nearly degenerate above 300 GeV (an extended decoupling region); (b) the heavier CP-even Higgs boson being SM-like and the neutral non-SM-like Higgs bosons all nearly degenerate around 100 GeV (a small non-decoupling region). On the other hand, due to the strong correlation between the Higgs decays to W+W and to γγ predicted in the MSSM, the apparent absence of a W+W final state signal is in direct conflict with the γγ peak. If we consider the W+W channel on its own, the absence of the W+W signal would imply that the SM-like Higgs boson has reduced coupling to W±, and that the other non-SM-like Higgs bosons should not be too heavy and do not decouple. If both the γγ excess and the absence of a W+W signal continue, new physics beyond the MSSM will be required. A similar correlation exists between the W+W and τ+τ channels: a reduced W+W channel would force the τ+τ channel to be larger. Future searches for the SM-like Higgs boson at the LHC will provide critical tests for the MSSM prediction. We also study the signals predicted for the non-SM-like Higgs bosons and emphasize the potential importance of the electroweak processes ppH+H, H±A0, which are independent of the SUSY parameters except for their masses. In addition, there may be sizable contributions from ppH±h0, A0h0 and W±H0, ZH0 in the low-mass non-decoupling region, which may serve to discriminate the model parameters. We allow variations of the relevant SUSY parameters in a broad range and demonstrate the correlations and constraints on these parameters and associated SUSY particles.

Article Text

References (53)

  1. ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 710, 49 (2012).
  2. CMS Collaboration, arXiv:1202.1488.
  3. Sandra Kortner (ATLAS Collaboration), The XLVIIth Rencontres de Moriond, Electroweak Session, March 7, 2012, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2012-019.
  4. Marco Pieri (CMS Collaboration), The XLVIIth Rencontres de Moriond, Electroweak Session, March 7, 2012.
  5. Combined results from the LEP2 experiments, Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003).
  6. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, Front. Phys. 80, 1 (2000); J. F. Gunion and H. E. Haber, Nucl. Phys. B272, 1 (1986); B402, 567(E) (1993).
  7. A. Djouadi, Phys. Rep. 459, 1 (2008).
  8. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 101803 (2009); V. M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 682, 278 (2009).
  9. CMS Collaboration, Report No. CMS-PAS-HIG-11-009; G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 705, 174 (2011).
  10. CMS Collaboration on A0τ+τ, Report No. CMS CMS-PAS-HIG-11-029, 2011.
  11. CMS Collaboration on tH±b, Report No. CMS PAS HIG-11-008, 2011.
  12. ATLAS Collaboration on tH±b, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2011-151, 2011.
  13. H. E. Haber, arXiv:hep-ph/9505240.
  14. J.-M. Gerard and M. Herquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 251802 (2007); E. Cervero and J.-M. Gerard, Phys. Lett. B 712, 255 (2012).
  15. M. Carena, S. Gori, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 014.
  16. Some recent papers dealt with the other MSSM aspects in light of the recent Higgs searches, see, e.g., H. Baer, V. Barger, and A. Mustafayev, Phys. Rev. D 85, 075010 (2012); T. Moroi and K. Nakayama, Phys. Lett. B 710, 159 (2012); O. Buchmueller et al., arXiv:1112.3564; S. Akula, B. Altunkaynak, D. Feldman, P. Nath, and G. Peim, Phys. Rev. D 85, 075001 (2012); M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, and M. Raidal, arXiv:1112.3647; J. Cao, Z. Heng, D. Li, and J. M. Yang, Phys. Lett. B 710, 665 (2012); P. Draper, P. Meade, M. Reece, and D. Shih, Phys. Rev. D 85, 095007 (2012); N. Desai, B. Mukhopadhyaya, and S. Niyogi, arXiv:1202.5190; H. Baer, V. Barger, and A. Mustafayev, arXiv:1202.4038.
  17. J. L. Feng, K. T. Matchev, and D. Sanford, Phys. Rev. D 85, 075007 (2012).
  18. M. S. Carena, M. Quiros, and C. E. M. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B461, 407 (1996).
  19. M. S. Carena, J. R. Espinosa, M. Quiros, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B 355, 209 (1995) [arXiv:hep-ph/9504316].
  20. M. S. Carena, S. Heinemeyer, C. E. M. Wagner, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 26, 601 (2003).
  21. G. Degrassi, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, P. Slavich, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 28, 133 (2003).
  22. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 9, 343 (1999).
  23. M. S. Carena, S. Mrenna, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 62, 055008 (2000).
  24. M. S. Carena, S. Mrenna, and C. E. M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D 60, 075010 (1999).
  25. L. J. Hall, R. Rattazzi, and U. Sarid, Phys. Rev. D 50, 7048 (1994); R. Hempfling, 49, 6168 (1994); M. S. Carena, M. Olechowski, S. Pokorski, and C. E. M. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B426, 269 (1994); J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev, D. M. Pierce, and R. J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1002 (1997); 78, 2497(E) (1997).
  26. M. Frank, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, H. Rzehak, and G. Weiglein, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2007) 047, and references therein.
  27. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, and G. Weiglein, Comput. Phys. Commun. 124, 76 (2000), and references therein.
  28. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 138 (2010), and references therein.
  29. P. Bechtle, O. Brein, S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, and K. E. Williams, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2605 (2011), and references therein.
  30. S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, and G. Weiglein, Phys. Lett. B 710, 201 (2012).
  31. I. Low and S. Shalgar, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 091.
  32. J. Cao, Z. Heng, J. M. Yang, Y. Zhang, and J. Zhu, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 086.
  33. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi, and J. Quevillon, Phys. Lett. B 708, 162 (2012).
  34. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, and F. Mahmoudi, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1906 (2012).
  35. A. Arvanitaki and G. Villadoro, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 144.
  36. L. Carpenter, J. Eckel, S. Su (work in progress).
  37. D. Asner et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group), arXiv:1010.1589.
  38. M. Misiak et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 022002 (2007).
  39. M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, Nucl. Phys. B764, 62 (2007).
  40. R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, Phys. Lett. B 309, 86 (1993).
  41. M. Duhrssen, S. Heinemeyer, H. Logan, D. Rainwater, G. Weiglein, and D. Zeppenfeld, Phys. Rev. D 70, 113009 (2004).
  42. S. Dittmaier et al. (LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration), arXiv:1101.0593.
  43. F. Maltoni, Z. Sullivan, and S. Willenbrock, Phys. Rev. D 67, 093005 (2003).
  44. J. L. Diaz-Cruz, H.-J. He, T. M. P. Tait, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4641 (1998).
  45. A. Pukhov, E. Boos, M. Dubinin, V. Edneral, V. Ilyin, D. Kovalenko, A. Kryukov, V. Savrin, S. Shichanin, and A. Semenov, arXiv:hep-ph/9908288
  46. S. Dawson, S. Dittmaier, and M. Spira, Phys. Rev. D 58, 115012 (1998).
  47. ATLAS Collaboration, Report No. ATLAS-CONF-2012-014, 2012.
  48. Q.-H. Cao, S. Kanemura, and C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 69, 075008 (2004).
  49. A. Belyaev, Q.-H. Cao, D. Nomura, K. Tobe, and C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 061801 (2008).
  50. ALTAS Collaboration, Report No. CERN-OPEN-2008-020.
  51. CMS Collaboration, Physics Technical Design Report, Vol. 2, Report No. CERN/LHCC 2006-021.
  52. M. Hashemi, S. Heinemeyer, R. Kinnunen, A. Nikitenko, and G. Weiglein, arXiv:0804.1228.
  53. S. Gennai, S. Heinemeyer, A. Kalinowski, R. Kinnunen, S. Lehti, A. Nikitenko, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 52, 383 (2007).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation