Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Anomaly-induced charges in baryons

Minoru Eto1,*, Koji Hashimoto2,†, Hideaki Iida2,‡, Takaaki Ishii3,§, and Yu Maezawa2,∥

  • 1Department of Physics, Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan
  • 2Mathematical Physics Laboratory, RIKEN Nishina Center, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
  • 3Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom

  • *eto@sci.kj.yamagata-u.ac.jp
  • koji@riken.jp
  • hiida@riken.jp
  • §T.Ishii@damtp.cam.ac.uk
  • maezawa@ribf.riken.jp

Phys. Rev. D 85, 114038 – Published 21 June, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.114038

Abstract

We study the Skyrme model of baryons with quantum chiral anomaly of QCD in magnetic backgrounds, and suggest a possible induction of a novel structure of electric charge inside the baryons. Due to the anomaly-induced gauged Wess-Zumino term (π0+multipion)E·B, the Skyrmions giving a local pion condensation (π0+multipion)0 would produce a local charge source, in the background magnetic field B0. Since the appearance of the total additional electric charge on the baryon looks unrealistic and surprising, we discuss the validity of our detailed evaluation of the anomaly effects.

Article Text

References (23)

  1. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. B 37, 95 (1971).
  2. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B223, 422 (1983); B223, 433 (1983).
  3. T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. R. Soc. A 260, 127 (1961).
  4. E. Witten, Phys. Lett. B 86, 283 (1979).
  5. F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1799 (1987).
  6. D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, Nucl. Phys. A 803, 227 (2008).
  7. K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa, Phys. Rev. D 78, 074033 (2008).
  8. M. Eto, K. Hashimoto, H. Iida, and A. Miwa, Phys. Rev. D 83, 125033 (2011).
  9. S. A. Voloshin (STAR), Nucl. Phys. A830, 377c (2009).
  10. M. Eto, K. Hashimoto, H. Iida, T. Ishii, Y. Maezawa, arXiv:1103.5443.
  11. G. S. Adkins and C. R. Nappi, Nucl. Phys. B233, 109 (1984).
  12. Y. Brihaye, N. K. Pak, and P. Rossi, Phys. Lett. B 149, 191 (1984).
  13. Note that, when we make the spatial integration, the last term in (43) drops off as it is a total derivative term. For massive pions, the pion profile of the Skyrmion always decays exponentially asymptotically, so the surface integral derived from the integration of this total derivative term always vanish.

  14. When we defined the isospin charge I3 in (34), we have not included the gauged WZW term (35). However, it can be shown that the isospin charge coming from (35) vanishes, as follows. Let us act the isospin transformation in the pion field U in the gauged WZW term (35): UUGUG where G=expiϵτ3. To obtain the current, following the standard Noether’s method, we regard the transformation parameter as a spacetime-dependent variable, G=G(x). Then we find LGUG(G)UG+GU(U)G+GG, and RGU(G)GUG+G(U)UG+(G)G. Using [G,τ3]=0, (G)G+GG=(GG)=0, and GG=GG=iτ3ϵ(x), we find that tr[τ3(L+R)] is invariant under this local transformation. So, there is no additional contribution to the isospin charge from the gauged WZW term. The result is natural, since the gauged WZW term is basically π02γ and this π0 does not carry the isospin charge. We would like to thank the referee for pointing out the effect of the WZW term.

  15. As long as we think of the massless pion as the limit mπ0, the surface term contribution can be always ignored.

  16. P. O. Mazur, M. A. Nowak, and M. Praszalowicz, Phys. Lett. B 147, 137 (1984).
  17. I. Zahed and G. E. Brown, Phys. Rep. 142, 1 (1986).
  18. D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonsky, Quantum Theory Of Angular Momentum (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
  19. It is possible that the last term in (43) gives additional multipoles, although it is negligible for the total charge. However, the term itself is not gauge-invariant and once combined with the baryon number term (the second term in (43)) it becomes gauge-invariant. In this paper we evaluate only the gauge-invariant janmμ for the quadrupole moment, and the other terms (which can be evaluated if a backreaction to the Skyrmion profile can be computed) are left for our future work.

  20. C. J. Houghton and N. S. Manton, and P. M. Sutcliffe, Nucl. Phys. B510, 507 (1998).
  21. N. S. Manton and P. M. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004), p. 493.
  22. D. E. Kharzeev, H.-U. Yee, and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D 84, 037503 (2011).
  23. G. S. Adkins, C. R. Nappi, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B228, 552 (1983).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation