Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Practically linear analogs of the Born-Infeld and other nonlinear theories

Mordehai Milgrom

  • DPPA, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

Phys. Rev. D 85, 105018 – Published 21 May, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.105018

Abstract

I discuss theories that describe fully nonlinear physics, while being practically linear (PL), in that they require solving only linear differential equations. These theories may be interesting in themselves as manageable nonlinear theories. But, they can also be chosen to emulate genuinely nonlinear theories of special interest, for which they can serve as approximations. The idea can be applied to a large class of nonlinear theories, exemplified here with a PL analogs of scalar theories, and of Born-Infeld (BI) electrodynamics. The general class of such PL theories of electromagnetism are governed by a Lagrangian L=(1/2)FμνQμν+S˜(Qμν), where Fμν=Aν,μAμ,ν, and Aμ couples to currents in the standard way, while Qμν=Bν,μBμ,ν is an auxiliary field that does not couple directly to currents. By picking a special form of S˜(Qμν), we can make such a theory similar in some regards to a given fully nonlinear theory, governed by the Lagrangian U˜(Fμν). For example, by similar we may imply that the theories are equivalent to second order in the expansion for weak fields, and that they are also equivalent for static configurations with one-dimensional symmetry (e.g., near point charges). A particularly felicitous choice, which implies the above similarities, is to take S˜ as the Legendre transform of U˜ in the variables Fμν. For the BI theory, this Legendre transform has the same form as the BI Lagrangian itself: S˜(Qμν,E02)=U˜(Qμν,E02) (E0 is the limiting field of the BI theory). Various matter-of-principle questions remain to be answered regarding such theories. As a specific example, I discuss BI electrostatics in more detail. As an aside, for BI, I derive an exact expression for the short-distance force between two arbitrary point charges of the same sign, in any dimension.

Article Text

References (17)

  1. J. Bekenstein and M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J. 286, 7 (1984).
  2. G. V. Dunne, inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics, Ian Kogan Memorial Collection Vol. 1, edited by M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, and J. Wheater (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005) pp. 445-522.
  3. G. W. Gibbons and D. A. Rasheed, Nucl. Phys. B454, 185 (1995).
  4. S. Deser, J. McCarthy, and Ö. Sarioğlu, Classical Quantum Gravity 16, 841 (1999).
  5. A. A. Tseytlin, arXiv:hep-th/9908105.
  6. M. Milgrom, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 403, 886 (2010).
  7. M. Milgrom, Phys. Rev. D 80, 123536 (2009).
  8. M. Milgrom, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 399, 474 (2009).
  9. P. Galianni, M. Feix, H. S. Zhao, and K. Horne, arXiv:1111.6681.
  10. G. W. Angus, K. van der Heyden, B. Famaey, G. Gentile, S. S. McGaugh, and W. J. G. de Blok, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 2598 (2012).
  11. C. Llinares, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Groningen, 2011.
  12. B. Famaey and S. McGaugh, arXiv:1112.3960 [Living Rev. Relativity (to be published)] .
  13. G. W. Gibbons, Nucl. Phys. B514, 603 (1998).
  14. D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations Of Second Order, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977).
  15. M. Milgrom,Phys. Lett. A 243, 33 (1998).
  16. M. Milgrom, J. Phys. A35, 1437 (2002).
  17. M. H. L. Pryce, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 50 (1935).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation