- Access by Xinjiang University
Quantum particle statistics on the holographic screen leads to modified Newtonian dynamics
Phys. Rev. D 85, 104021 – Published 9 May, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.104021
Abstract
Employing a thermodynamic interpretation of gravity based on the holographic principle and assuming underlying particle statistics, fermionic or bosonic, for the excitations of the holographic screen leads to modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). A connection between the acceleration scale appearing in MOND and the Fermi energy of the holographic fermionic degrees of freedom is obtained. In this formulation the physics of MOND results from the quantum-classical crossover in the fermionic specific heat. However, due to the dimensionality of the screen, the formalism is general and applies to two-dimensional bosonic excitations as well. It is shown that replacing the assumption of the equipartition of energy on the holographic screen by a standard quantum-statistical-mechanics description wherein some of the degrees of freedom are frozen out at low temperatures is the physical basis for the MOND interpolating function . The interpolating function is calculated within the statistical mechanical formalism and compared to the leading phenomenological interpolating functions, most commonly used. Based on the statistical mechanical view of MOND, its cosmological implications are reinterpreted: the connection between and the Hubble constant is described as a quantum uncertainty relation; and the relationship between and the cosmological constant is better understood physically.
Article Text
References (23)
- J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973).
- S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975).
- W. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976).
- T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260 (1995).
- T. Padmanabhan, Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 046901 (2010).
- E. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2011) 029; arXiv:1001.0875.
- T. Padmanabhan, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 4485 (2004); Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 1129 (2010).
- M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J. 270, 371 (1983).
- A. G. Riess et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998); S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
- M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J. 478, 7 (1997).
- M. Milgrom, Astrophys. J. 270, 365 (1983).
- M. Milgrom, Phys. Lett. A 253, 273 (1999).
- X. Li and Z. Chang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 55, 733 (2011); 55, 733 (2011).
- V. V. Kiselev and S. A. Timofeev, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 109 (2011).
- F. R. Klinkhamer and M. Kopp, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 2783 (2011); arXiv:1104.2022.
- J. A. Neto, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50, 3552 (2011).
- S. H. Hendi and A. Shekhi, Phys. Rev. D 83, 084012 (2011).
- L. Modesto and A. Randono, arXiv:1003.1998.
- B. Famacy and S. McGaugh, arXiv:1112.3960.
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics (Pergamon, Oxford, 1989).
- R. M. May, Phys. Rev. 135, A1515 (1964).
- D. V. Anghel, J. Phys. A 35, 7255 (2002).
- C. M. Ho, D. Minic, and Y. J. Ng, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43 2567 (2011).