Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Constraining the dark energy and smoothness parameter with type Ia supernovae and gamma-ray bursts

V. C. Busti1,*, R. C. Santos2,†, and J. A. S. Lima1,‡

  • 1Departamento de Astronomia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • 2Departamento de Ciências Exatas e da Terra, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Diadema, SP, Brasil

  • *vcbusti@astro.iag.usp.br
  • cliviars@astro.iag.usp.br
  • limajas@astro.iag.usp.br

Phys. Rev. D 85, 103503 – Published 7 May, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.103503

Abstract

The existence of inhomogeneities in the observed Universe modifies the distance-redshift relations thereby affecting the results of cosmological tests in comparison to the ones derived assuming spatially uniform models. By modeling the inhomogeneities through a Zeldovich-Kantowski-Dyer-Roeder approach which is phenomenologically characterized by a smoothness parameter α, we rediscuss the constraints on the cosmic parameters based on type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) data. The present analysis is restricted to a flat ΛCDM model with the reasonable assumption that Λ does not clump. A χ2 analysis using 557 SNe Ia data from the Union2 compilation data (R. Amanullah et al., Astrophys. J. 716, 712 (2010).) constrains the pair of parameters (Ωm, α) to Ωm=0.270.03+0.08 (2σ) and α0.25. A similar analysis based only on 59 Hymnium GRBs (H. Wei, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2010) 020.) constrains the matter density parameter to be Ωm=0.350.24+0.62 (2σ) while all values for the smoothness parameter are allowed. By performing a joint analysis, it is found that Ωm=0.270.03+0.06 and α0.52. As a general result, although considering that current GRB data alone cannot constrain the smoothness α parameter, our analysis provides an interesting cosmological probe for dark energy even in the presence of inhomogeneities.

Article Text

References (49)

  1. T. Mattsson, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42, 567 (2010); S. Rasanen, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2010) 018; C. Clarkson, G. Ellis, A. Faltenbacher, R. Maartens, O. Umeh, and J.-P. Uzan, arXiv:1109.2484.
  2. K. Bolejko, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 412, 1937 (2011); J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2011) 025.
  3. C. C. Dyer and R. C. Roeder, Astrophys. J. Lett. 174, L115 (1972); 180, L31 (1973).
  4. P. Schneider, J. Ehlers, and E. E. Falco, Gravitational Lenses (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992).
  5. Ya. B. Zeldovich, Astron. Zh. 41, 19 (1964) [Sov. Astron. 8, 13 (1964)].
  6. R. Kantowski, Astrophys. J. 155, 89 (1969).
  7. R. Kantowski, Phys. Rev. D 68, 123516 (2003).
  8. R. Kantowski, Astrophys. J. 507, 483 (1998).
  9. R. Kantowski, J. K. Kao, and R. C. Thomas, Astrophys. J. 545, 549 (2000).
  10. M. Demianski, R. de Ritis, A. A. Marino, and E. Piedipalumbo, Astron. Astrophys. 411, 33 (2003).
  11. M. Sereno, G. Covone, E. Piedipalumbo, and R. de Ritis, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 327, 517 (2001); G. Covone, M. Sereno, and R. de Ritis, 357, 773 (2005).
  12. J. A. S. Lima and J. S. Alcaniz, Astron. Astrophys. 357, 393 (2000); Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 32, 1851 (2000); G. F. Lewis and R. A. Ibata, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 26 (2002).
  13. F. Giovi and L. Amendola, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 325, 1097 (2001).
  14. C. S. Kochanek, Astrophys. J. 578, 25 (2002).
  15. C. S. Kochanek and P. L. Schechter, Measuring and Modeling the Universe (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2002), p. 117.
  16. M. de Campos and J. A. Souza, Astron. Astrophys. 422, 401 (2004).
  17. J. S. Alcaniz, J. A. S. Lima, and R. Silva, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 1309 (2004).
  18. R. C. Santos and J. A. S. Lima, Phys. Rev. D 77, 083505 (2008).
  19. R. C. Santos, J. V. Cunha, and J. A. S. Lima, Phys. Rev. D 77, 023519 (2008); V. C. Busti and R. C. Santos, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 11, 637 (2011).
  20. P. Astier et al., Astron. Astrophys. 447, 31 (2006).
  21. A. G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. 659, 98 (2007).
  22. T. Piran, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1143 (2005).
  23. P. Mészáros, Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 2259 (2006).
  24. G. Ghirlanda, G. Ghisellini, and C. Firmani, New J. Phys. 8, 123 (2006); F.-W. Zhang, L. Shao, J.-Z. Yan, and D.-M. Wei, arXiv:1201.1549 [Astrophys. J. (to be published)].
  25. B. E. Schaefer, Astrophys. J. 660, 16 (2007).
  26. E. Mörtsel and J. Sollerman, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2005) 009; T. Di Girolamo, R. Catena, M. Vietri, and G. Di Sciascio, 04 (2005) 008; H. J. Mosquera Cuesta, M. H. Dumet, and C. Furlanetto, 07 (2008) 004; S. Qi, F.-Y. Wang, and T. Lu, Astron. Astrophys. 487, 853 (2008); S. Basilakos and L. Perivolaropoulos, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 391, 411 (2008); R. Tsuitsui, T. Nakamura, D. Yonetoku, T. Murakami, S. Tanabe, Y. Kodama, and K. Takahashi, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 394, L31 (2009).
  27. N. Liang, P. Wu, and S. N. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 81, 083518 (2010); G. Ghirlanda, L. Nava, and G. Ghisellini, Astron. Astrophys. 511, A43 (2010); L. Xu and Y. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 702, 114 (2011).
  28. L. Samushia and B. Ratra, Astrophys. J. 714, 1347 (2010); R. Lazkoz, V. Salzano, and I. Sendra, Phys. Lett. B 694, 198 (2010); E. Costa and F. Frontera, Nuovo Cimento 34, 585 (2011); P. N. Bhat and S. Guiriec, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India 39, 471 (2011), edited by D. J. Saikia and D. A. Green (2011).
  29. S. E. Woosley and J. S. Bloom, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 44, 507 (2006).
  30. N. R. Tanvir et al., Nature (London) 461, 1254 (2009); R. Salvaterra et al., 461, 1258 (2009).
  31. P. Petitjean and S. D. Vergani, C.R. Physique 12, 288 (2011).
  32. R. Amanullah et al., Astrophys. J. 716, 712 (2010).
  33. H. Wei, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2010) 020.
  34. R. K. Sachs, Proc. R. Soc. A 264, 309 (1961); P. Jordan, J. Ehlers, and R. K. Sachs, Akad. Wiss. Mainz 1, 1 (1961).
  35. M. Mattsson and T. Mattsson, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2010) 021.
  36. M. Kasai, T. Futamase, and F. Takahara, Phys. Lett. A147, 97 (1990); E. V. Linder, Astron. Astrophys. 206, 190 (1988); Astrophys. J. 497, 28 (1998).
  37. I. M. H. Etherington, Philos. Mag. 15, 761 (1933). Recently, possible violations of the distance duality relation have been investigated by many authors (see, for instance, Refs. [48,49].
  38. A. G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. 699, 539 (2009).
  39. J. Guy et al., Astron. Astrophys. 466, 11 (2007).
  40. L. Amati et al., Astron. Astrophys. 390, 81 (2002).
  41. J. P. Norris, Astrophys. J. 579, 386 (2002); D. Guetta, R. Perna, L. Stella, and M. Vietri, Astrophys. J. Lett. 615, L73 (2004); A. M. Soderberg et al., Nature (London) 430, 648 (2004).
  42. G. Ghirlanda, G. Ghisellini, D. Lazzati, and C. Firmani, Astrophys. J. Lett. 613, L13 (2004); C. Firmani, G. Ghisellini, G. Ghirlanda, and V. Avila-Reese, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 360, L1 (2005); E. W. Liang and B. Zhang, 369, L37 (2006); H. Li, J.-Q. Xia, J. Liu, G.-B. Zhao, Z.-H. Fan, and X. Zhang, Astrophys. J. 680, 92 (2008); Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 78, 123532 (2008).
  43. Y. Kodama, D. Yonetoku, T. Murakami, S. Tanabe, R. Tsuitsui, and T. Nakamura, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 391, L1 (2008).
  44. N. Liang, W. K. Xiao, Y. Liu, and S. N. Zhang, Astrophys. J. 685, 354 (2008).
  45. A. C. Collazzi, B. E. Schaefer, A. Goldstein, and R. D. Preece, Astrophys. J. 747, 39 (2012).
  46. L. Amati, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 372, 233 (2006); L. Amati, C. Guidorzi, F. Frontera, M. Della Valle, F. Finelli, R. Landi, and E. Montanari, 391, 577 (2008); L. Amati, F. Frontera, and C. Guidorzi, Astron. Astrophys. 508, 173 (2009).
  47. J.-P. Uzan, C. Clarkson, and G. F. R. Ellis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 191303 (2008).
  48. B. A. Bassett and M. Kunz, Phys. Rev. D 69, 101305 (2004).
  49. R. F. L. Holanda, J. A. S. Lima, and M. B. Ribeiro, Astrophys. J. Lett. 722, L233 (2010); Astron. Astrophys. 528, L14 (2011).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation