Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Shrinking the quadratic estimator of weak lensing

Ethan Anderes and Debashis Paul

  • Statistics Department, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA

Phys. Rev. D 85, 103003 – Published 8 May, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.103003

Abstract

We study a regression characterization for the quadratic estimator of weak lensing, developed by Hu and Okamoto [W. Hu, Astrophys. J. 557, L79 (2001).][W. Hu and T. Okamoto, Astrophys. J. 574, 566 (2002).][T. Okamoto and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 67, 083002 (2003).], for cosmic microwave background observations. This characterization motivates a modification of the quadratic estimator by an adaptive Wiener filter which uses the robust Bayesian techniques described in [J. Berger, Ann. Stat. 8, 716 (1980).][J. Berger, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (Springer, New York, 1980).][W. Strawderman, Ann. Stat. 42, 385 (1971).]. This technique requires the user to propose a fiducial model for the spectral density of the unknown lensing potential but the resulting estimator is developed to be robust to mis-specification of this model. The role of the fiducial spectral density is to give the estimator superior statistical performance in a “neighborhood of the fiducial model” while controlling the statistical errors when the fiducial spectral density is drastically wrong. Our estimate also highlights some advantages provided by a Bayesian analysis of the quadratic estimator.

Article Text

References (31)

  1. M. Kaplinghat, L. Knox, and Y. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 241301 (2003).
  2. B. Sherwin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 021302 (2011).
  3. K. Smith, W. Hu, and K. Manoj, Phys. Rev. D 74, 123002 (2006).
  4. M. Kesden, A. Cooray, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011304 (2002).
  5. L. Knox and Y. Song, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011303 (2002).
  6. U. Seljak and C. Hirata, Phys. Rev. D 69, 043005 (2004).
  7. E. Anderes, L. Knox, and A. van Engelen, Phys. Rev. D 83, 043523 (2011).
  8. M. Bucher, C. S. Carvalho, K. Moodley, and M. Remazeilles, Phys. Rev. D 85, 043016 (2012).
  9. C. S. Carvalho and K. Moodley, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123010 (2010).
  10. C. Hirata and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 67, 043001 (2003).
  11. C. Hirata and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 68, 083002 (2003).
  12. W. Hu, Astrophys. J. 557, L79 (2001).
  13. W. Hu and T. Okamoto, Astrophys. J. 574, 566 (2002).
  14. T. Okamoto and W. Hu, Phys. Rev. D 67, 083002 (2003).
  15. S. Das et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 021301 (2011).
  16. A. van Engelen, arXiv:1202.0546.
  17. S. Dodelson, Modern Cosmology (Academic Press, New York, 2003).
  18. J. Berger, Ann. Stat. 8, 716 (1980).
  19. W. Strawderman, Ann. Stat. 42, 385 (1971).
  20. W. James and C. Stein, Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (University of California, Berkeley, 1961) Vol. 1, pp.361-379.
  21. D. Hanson, A. Challinor, G. Efstathiou, and P. Bielewicz, Phys. Rev. D 83, 043005 (2011).
  22. M. Kesden, A. Cooray, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. D 67, 123507 (2003).
  23. A. Lewis and A. Challinor, Phys. Rep. 429, 1 (2006).
  24. H. Eriksen et al., Astrophys. J. 155, 227 (2004).
  25. B. Wandelt, D. Larson, and A. Lakshminarayanan, Phys. Rev. D 70, 083511 (2004).
  26. J. Berger, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (Springer, New York, 1980).
  27. J. Berger, Ann. Stat. 4, 223 (1976).
  28. E. Lehmann and G. Casella, Theory of Point Estimation (Springer, New York, 1998).
  29. M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 59, 123507 (1999).
  30. A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000).
  31. E. Lehmann and J. Romano, Testing Statistical Hypotheses (Springer, New York, 2005).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation