Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Studies of the decays D0KS0Kπ+ and D0KS0K+π

J. Insler1, H. Muramatsu1, C. S. Park1, L. J. Pearson1, E. H. Thorndike1, S. Ricciardi2, C. Thomas2,3, M. Artuso4, S. Blusk4 et al. (CLEO Collaboration)

S. Blusk4, R. Mountain4, T. Skwarnicki4, S. Stone4, J. C. Wang4, L. M. Zhang4, G. Bonvicini5, D. Cinabro5, M. J. Smith5, P. Zhou5, T. Gershon6, P. Naik7, J. Rademacker7, K. W. Edwards8, K. Randrianarivony8, R. A. Briere9, H. Vogel9, P. U. E. Onyisi10, J. L. Rosner10, J. P. Alexander11, D. G. Cassel11, S. Das11, R. Ehrlich11, L. Gibbons11, S. W. Gray11, D. L. Hartill11, D. L. Kreinick11, V. E. Kuznetsov11, J. R. Patterson11, D. Peterson11, D. Riley11, A. Ryd11, A. J. Sadoff11, X. Shi11, W. M. Sun11, J. Yelton12, P. Rubin13, N. Lowrey14, S. Mehrabyan14, M. Selen14, J. Wiss14, J. Libby15, M. Kornicer16, R. E. Mitchell16, D. Besson17, T. K. Pedlar18, D. Cronin-Hennessy19, J. Hietala19, S. Dobbs20, Z. Metreveli20, K. K. Seth20, A. Tomaradze20, T. Xiao20, D. Johnson3, S. Malde3, L. Martin3, A. Powell3, G. Wilkinson3, D. M. Asner21, G. Tatishvili21, J. Y. Ge22, D. H. Miller22, I. P. J. Shipsey22, B. Xin22, G. S. Adams23, J. Napolitano23, and K. M. Ecklund24 (CLEO Collaboration)

  • 1University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
  • 2STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
  • 3University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
  • 4Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA
  • 5Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA
  • 6University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
  • 7University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TL, United Kingdom
  • 8Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6
  • 9Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
  • 10University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 11Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
  • 12University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
  • 13George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA
  • 14University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61801, USA
  • 15Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600036, India
  • 16Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
  • 17University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA
  • 18Luther College, Decorah, Iowa 52101, USA
  • 19University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 20Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
  • 21Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA
  • 22Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA
  • 23Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, USA
  • 24Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA

Phys. Rev. D 85, 092016 – Published 29 May, 2012Erratum Phys. Rev. D 94, 099905 (2016)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.092016

Abstract

The first measurements of the coherence factor RKS0Kπ and the average strong-phase difference δDKS0Kπ in D0KS0Kπ± decays are reported. These parameters can be used to improve the determination of the unitary triangle angle γ in BD˜K decays, where D˜ is either a D0 or a D¯0 meson decaying to the same final state, and also in studies of charm mixing. The measurements of the coherence factor and strong-phase difference are made using quantum-correlated, fully reconstructed D0D¯0 pairs produced in e+e collisions at the ψ(3770) resonance. The measured values are RKS0Kπ=0.73±0.08 and δDKS0Kπ=(8.3±15.2)° for an unrestricted kinematic region and RK*K=1.00±0.16 and δDK*K=(26.5±15.8)° for a region where the combined KS0π± invariant mass is within 100MeV/c2 of the K*(892)± mass. These results indicate a significant level of coherence in the decay. In addition, isobar models are presented for the two decays, which show the dominance of the K*(892)± resonance. The branching ratio B(D0KS0K+π)/B(D0KS0Kπ+) is determined to be 0.592±0.044(stat)±0.018(syst), which is more precise than previous measurements.

Erratum

Erratum: Studies of the decays D0KS0Kπ+ and D0KS0K+π [Phys. Rev. D 85, 092016 (2012)]

J. Insler et al. (CLEO Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 94, 099905 (2016)

Article Text

References (24)

  1. N. Cabibbo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531 (1963); M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652, (1973).
  2. S. Malde and G. Wilkinson, Phys. Lett. B 701, 353 (2011).
  3. B. Bhattacharya and J. Rosner, arXiv:1104.4962.
  4. K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010).
  5. D. Atwood and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 68, 033003 (2003).
  6. D. Atwood, I. Dunietz, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3257 (1997); Phys. Rev. D 63, 036005 (2001).
  7. N. Lowrey et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 80, 031105R (2009).
  8. D. Peterson et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 478, 142 (2002).
  9. R. A. Briere et al. (CLEO-c/CESR-c Taskforces and CLEO Collaboration) Cornell LEPP, Report No. CLNS 01/1742, 2001 (unpublished).
  10. Y. Kubota et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 320, 66 (1992); M. Artuso et al. (CLEO Collaboration), 502, 91 (2003).
  11. S. Dobbs et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 76, 112001 (2007).
  12. D. Lange et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 462, 152 (2001).
  13. R. Brun et al., GEANT 3.21, CERN Program Library Long Writeup, Report No. W5013 (unpublished).
  14. J. Libby et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 82, 112006 (2010).
  15. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 034023 (2008).
  16. Q. He et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 091801 (2008).
  17. S. Kopp et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 63, 092001 (2001).
  18. J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).
  19. P. Frabetti et al. (E687 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 331, 217 (1994).
  20. D. Aston et al. (LASS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B296, 493 (1988).
  21. S. M. Flatte, Phys. Lett. 63B, 224 (1976).
  22. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 111602 (2012); T. Altonen et al. (CDF Collaboration) Phys. Rev. D 85, 012009 (2012).
  23. For a review, see M. Artuso, B. Meadows, and A. A. Petrov, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 58, 249 (2008).
  24. D. Asner et al. (HFAG), arXiv:1010.1589.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation