- Access by Xinjiang University
Supernova relic neutrino search at super-Kamiokande
Phys. Rev. D 85, 052007 – Published 22 March, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.052007
Abstract
A new Super-Kamiokande search for supernova relic neutrinos was conducted using 2853 live days of data. Sensitivity is now greatly improved compared to the 2003 Super-Kamiokande result, which placed a flux limit near many theoretical predictions. This more detailed analysis includes a variety of improvements such as increased efficiency, a lower energy threshold, and an expanded data set. New combined upper limits on supernova relic neutrino flux are between 2.8 and total positron energy (17.3 MeV ).
Article Text
References (35)
- E. Cappellaro, R. Evans, and M. Turatto, Astron. Astrophys. 351, 459 (1999).
- G. S. Bisnovatyi-kogan and Z. F. Seidov, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 422, 319 (1984).
- L. M. Krauss, S. L. Glashow, and D. N. Schramm, Nature (London) 310, 191 (1984).
- S. E.Woosley, J. R. Wilson, and R. Mayle, Astrophys. J. 302, 19 (1986).
- T. Totani, K. Sato, and Y. Yoshii, Astrophys. J. 460, 303 (1996).
- R. A. Malaney, Astropart. Phys. 7, 125 (1997).
- D. H. Hartmann and S. E. Woosley, Astropart. Phys. 7, 137 (1997).
- M. Kaplinghat, G. Steigman, and T. P. Walker, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043001 (2000).
- S. Ando, K. Sato, and T. Totani, Astropart. Phys. 18, 307 (2003).
The flux of the LMA model is increased by a factor of 2.56 from the paper, a revision introduced at NNN05.
- C. Lunardini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 231101 (2009).
Assumed parameters are failed SN rate = 22%, equation of state = Lattimer-Swesty, and survival probability = 68%.
- S. Horiuchi, J. F. Beacom, and E. Dwek, Phys. Rev. D 79, 083013 (2009).
- M. Malek et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 061101 (2003).
- W. Zhang et al. (Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 385 (1988).
- B. Aharmim et al. (SNO), Astrophys. J. 653, 1545 (2006).
- KamLAND Collaboration, arXiv:1105.3516.
- L. Strigari, M. Kaplinghat, G. Steigman, and T. Walker, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2004) 007.
- Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 501, 418 (2003).
- M. Nakahata et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 421, 113 (1999).
- E. Blaufuss et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 458, 638 (2001).
- C. Yanagisawa and T. Kato, Report on the Super-Kamiokande Accident, Tech. Rep. Stony Brook University, 2001.
- H. Nishino et al., in Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2007. NSS ’07. IEEE (2007), p. 127.
- S. Yamada, Y. Obayashi, M. Shiozawa, and Y. Hayato, in Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2008. NSS ’08. IEEE (2008), p. 1387.
- A. Strumia and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B 564, 42 (2003).
- P. Vogel and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. D 60, 053003 (1999).
- J. Hosaka et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 112001 (2006).
- J. P. Cravens et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 78, 032002 (2008).
- Y. Ashie et al. (Super-Kamiokande), Phys. Rev. D 71, 112005 (2005).
- Y. Hayato, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 112, 171 (2002).
- K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010).
- J. F. Beacom, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60, 439 (2010).
- H. Yüksel, S. Ando, and J. F. Beacom, Phys. Rev. C 74, 015803 (2006).
- J. F. Beacom and M. R. Vagins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171101 (2004).
- B. Jegerlehner, F. Neubig, and G. Raffelt, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1194 (1996).