Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

γγπ(η,η) transition form factors

Dmitri Melikhov1,2,3 and Berthold Stech4

  • 1HEPHY, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Nikolsdorfergasse 18, A-1050 Vienna, Austria
  • 2Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 3SINP, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
  • 4ITP, Heidelberg University, Philosophenweg 16, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany

Phys. Rev. D 85, 051901(R) – Published 30 March, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.051901

Abstract

The surprising results by the BABAR Collaboration on the πγ transition form factor require new thoughts about the high-Q2 dependence of the form factors with virtual photons. We make use of the anomaly sum rule [J. Horejsi and O. Teryaev, Z. Phys. C 65, 691 (1995).] which relates the hadron spectral density to the axial anomaly [S. Adler, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969); J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento A 60, 47 (1969).]. We study the quark-hadron duality relation for this sum rule and find out that the increase of the rescaled form factor Q2Fπγ(Q2)log(Q2) suggested by the BABAR data requires the presence of a 1/s-correction term in the relation between the one-loop spectral density and the hadron-continuum spectral density.

Article Text

References (26)

  1. H. J. Behrend et al. (CELLO Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 49, 401 (1991).
  2. J. Gronberg et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 57, 33 (1998).
  3. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74, 012002 (2006).
  4. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 80, 052002 (2009).
  5. P. del Amo Sanchez (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 84, 052001 (2011).
  6. A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 80, 094009 (2009).
  7. H. L. L. Roberts, C. D. Roberts, A. Bashir, L. X. Gutierrez-Guerrero, and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Rev. C 82, 065202 (2010).
  8. A. Dorokhov, JETP Lett. 91, 163 (2010).
  9. S. S. Agaev, V. M. Braun, N. Offen, and F. A. Porkert, Phys. Rev. D 83, 054020 (2011).
  10. Y. N. Klopot, A. G. Oganesian, and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Lett. B 695, 130 (2011); Phys. Rev. D 84, 051901 (2011).
  11. S. J. Brodsky, F.-G. Cao, and G. F. de Teramond, Phys. Rev. D 84, 033001 (2011); 84, 075012 (2011).
  12. P. Kroll, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1623 (2011).
  13. A. P. Bakulev, S. V. Mikhailov, A. V. Pimikov, and N. G. Stefanis, Phys. Rev. D 84, 034014 (2011); arXiv:1202.1781.
  14. I. Balakireva, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Phys. Rev. D 85, 036006 (2012); arXiv:1103.3781; W. Lucha and D. Melikhov, J. Phys. G 39, 045003 (2012).
  15. H. Czyz, S. Ivashyn, A. Korchin, and O. Shekhovtsova, arXiv:1202.1171.
  16. C.-C. Lih and C.-Q. Geng, Phys. Rev. C 85, 018201 (2012).
  17. G. P. Lepage and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22, 2157 (1980).
  18. J. Horejsi and O. Teryaev, Z. Phys. C 65, 691 (1995).
  19. S. Adler, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426 (1969); J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw, Nuovo Cimento A 60, 47 (1969).
  20. D. Melikhov and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 151601 (2002).
  21. D. Melikhov, Eur. Phys. J. direct C 4, 2 (2002).
  22. S. Adler and B. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 182, 1517 (1969).
  23. R. S. Pasechnik and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. D 73, 034017 (2006).
  24. F. Jegerlehner and O. V. Tarasov, Phys. Lett. B 639, 299 (2006).
  25. V. V. Anisovich, D. I. Melikhov, and V. A. Nikonov, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2918 (1997).
  26. T. Feldmann, P. Kroll, and B. Stech, Phys. Rev. D 58, 114006 (1998); Phys. Lett. B 449, 339 (1999).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation