- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Fermion condensates and Lorentz symmetry breaking in strongly coupled large N gauge theories

E. T. Tomboulis

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1547, USA

  • *tomboulis@physics.ucla.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 85, 024042 – Published 25 January, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024042

Abstract

The possibility of Lorentz symmetry breaking (LSB) has attracted considerable attention in recent years. Spontaneous LSB, in particular, offers the attractive prospect of the graviton as a Nambu-Goldstone boson. Here we consider the question of spontaneous LSB in lattice gauge theories via formation of fermion condensates in the strong coupling and large N limits. We employ naive massless fermions in a fermionic hopping expansion in the presence of sources coupled to various condensate operators of interest. The expansion is summed in the large N limit in two equivalent ways: (i) direct summation of all leading N graphs and (ii) construction of the corresponding large N effective action for composite operators. When sources are turned off, a variety of fermionic condensates are found to persist. These include the chiral symmetry breaking condensates—thus recovering previous results—but also some LSB condensates, in particular, axial vector and rank-2 tensor condensates. Furthermore, in the presence of internal (global) symmetry groups, formation of condensates “locking” internal and external (Lorentz subgroup) symmetries is found to also become possible. Some implications and open questions are briefly discussed.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (28)

  1. J. D. Bjorken, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 24, 174 (1963); arXiv:hep-th/0111196.
  2. P. R. Phillips, Phys. Rev. 146, 966 (1966); H. C. Ohanian, 184, 1305 (1969).
  3. P. Kraus and E. T. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D 66, 045015 (2002).
  4. S. M. Carroll, H. Tam, and I. K. Wehus, Phys. Rev. D 80, 025020 (2009).
  5. Z. Berezhiani and O. V. Kancheli, arXiv:0808.3181v1; A. Kostelecky and R. Potting, Phys. Rev. D 79, 065018 (2009); A. Jenkins, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 2249 (2009).

  6. In the case of QCD, however, which is in one phase for all values of the bare coupling, these features can be expected to persist in the continuum limit.

  7. J-M Blairon, R. Brout, F. Englert, and J. Greensite, Nucl. Phys. B180, 439 (1981).
  8. O. Martin and B. Siu, Phys. Lett. 131B, 419 (1983).
  9. J. M. Cornwell, R. Jackiw, and E. T. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2428 (1974).
  10. N. Kawamoto and J. Smit, Nucl. Phys. B192, 100 (1981); H. Kluberg-Stern, A. Morel, O. Napoly, and B. Peterson, B190, 504 (1981).
  11. M. G. Alford, K. Rajagopal, and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B537, 443 (1999). For a review see M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal, and T. Schäfer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1455 (2008).
  12. R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1116 (1976); P. Hasenfratz and G. ’t Hooft, 36, 1119 (1976).
  13. E. T. Tomboulis, Proc. Sci., LAT2010 (2010) 290 [arXiv:1011.1534].
  14. H. J. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005), 3rd ed..
  15. I. O. Stamatescu, Phys. Rev. D 25, 1130 (1982).

  16. Closed paths not so coupled give disconnected graphs canceling against the denominator.

  17. Indeed, the rules of Grassmann integration automatically take into account the exclusion principle: the path-integral (signed) summation over all fermionic configurations gives the appropriate cancellations between configurations contributing to connected and disconnected graphs. As a result, after the factoring of disconnected graphs, one is left with unrestricted sums for the remaining connected graphs [14].

  18. Another similar example [9] is the large N limit of the O(N) model, where again a single 2-PI graph replaces the direct summation [19] of the infinite set of leading N graphs.

  19. S. Coleman, R. Jackiw, and H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2491 (1974).
  20. K. E. Eriksson, N. Svartholm, and B. S. Skagerstam, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 22, 2276 (1981); I. Bars, 21, 2678 (1980); S. Samuel, 21, 2695 (1980).
  21. E. Brezin and D. J. Gross, Phys. Lett. 97B, 120 (1980); R. C. Brower and M. Nauenberg, Nucl. Phys. B180, 221 (1981).

  22. Picking out particular choices of pairs in products of Grassmann variables inside a Grassmann integral to be replaced by bosonic variables is tricky. Any approximations generally render the procedure ambiguous. In the present case note that the powers of A¯A can be reexpressed as powers of different pairings of Grassmann fields by Fierz rearrangements. In this manner one may equally well introduce other composite fields that may be similarly replaced by bosonic variables. Any subsequent approximations lead to the ambiguities of what becomes essentially an ad hoc Hartree-Fock type of approximation. An appeal to special factorization properties at large N may in certain cases justify such manipulations.

  23. For non-vanishing-source k one obtains ⟨ψ¯(x)ψ(x)⟩k=−NS[d(k2+2d−1)1/2−k(d−1)](d2+k2).

  24. M. F. L. Golterman and J. Smit, Nucl. Phys. B245, 61 (1984); P. Mitra and P. Weisz, Phys. Lett. 126B, 355 (1983).
  25. Starting with Majorana’s seminal work in the early 1930s, attempts have been made over the decades to employ infinite dimensional unitary representations in field theory. Replacing the customary finite-dimensional nonunitary representations for external groups, such as the Lorentz group, with infinite dimensional unitary representations can lead to problems of physical interpretation with regard to particle spectrum, e.g., the existence of spacelike continuum spectrum solutions, as well as the spin-statistics connection. The potential use of noncompact groups became a popular subject in the heyday of current algebras in the 1960s in connection with relativistic extensions of SU(6). Another application that emerged from that time is that of noncompact algebras as “spectrum generating algebras”; see, e.g., A. Bohm, Y. Ne’eman, and A. O. Barut, Dynamical Groups and Spectrum Generating Algebras (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
  26. F. Sannino, in Review of Vector Condensation at High Chemical Potential, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 688 (AIP, New York, 2003), p. 121.
  27. A. Adams, A. Jenkins, and D. O’Connell, arXiv:0802.4081.
  28. R. Narayanan, Proc. Sci., LAT2007 (2007) 272 [arXiv:0709.4494].

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 85, 024042– Published 25 January, 2012
  • Received 25 July 2011
Article part of CHORUS

© 2012 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation