- Access by Xinjiang University
Action principle for the fluid-gravity correspondence and emergent gravity
Phys. Rev. D 85, 024004 – Published 4 January, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.024004
Abstract
It has been known for a long time that Einstein’s field equations when projected onto a black hole horizon look very similar to a Navier-Stokes equation in suitable variables. More recently, it was shown that the projection of Einstein’s equation onto any null surface in any spacetime reduces exactly to the Navier-Stokes form when viewed in the freely falling frame. We develop an action principle, the extremization of which leads to the above result, in an arbitrary spacetime. The degrees of freedom varied in the action principle are the null vectors in the spacetime and not the metric tensor. The same action principle was introduced earlier in the context of the emergent gravity paradigm wherein it was shown that the corresponding Lagrangian can be interpreted as the entropy density of spacetime. The current analysis strengthens this interpretation and reinforces the idea that field equations in gravity can be thought of as emergent. We also find that the degrees of freedom on the null surface are equivalent to a fluid with equation of state . We demonstrate that the same relation arises in the context of a spherical shell collapsing to form a horizon.
Article Text
References (16)
- T. Padmanabhan, Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 046901 (2010); J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 306, 012001 (2011).
- A. D. Sakharov, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 12, 1040 (1968).
- B. L. Hu, arXiv:gr-qc/9607070; T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260 (1995); G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University, New York, 2003); C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, Living Rev. Relativity 8, 12 (2005).
- T. Padmanabhan, Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 5387 (2002); Dawood Kothawala and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 79, 104020 (2009); T. Padmanabhan, in A Physical Interpretation of Gravitational Field Equations, edited by Jean-Micheal Alimi and Andre Fuzfa, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 1241 (AIP, New York, 2010).
- A. Mukhopadhyay and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 74, 124023 (2006); Sanved Kolekar and T. Padmanabhan, 82, 024036 (2010).
- T. Padmanabhan and Aseem Paranjape, Phys. Rev. D 75, 064004 (2007); T. Padmanabhan, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 529 (2007).
- T. Padmanabhan, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 1129 (2010); Phys. Rev. D 81, 124040 (2010).
- T. Damour, thèse de doctorat d’État, Université Paris 6, 1979 (in French) [http://www.ihes.fr/damour/Articles/]; in Proceedings of the Second Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, edited by R. Ruffini (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982), p. 587.
- K. S. Thorne et al., Yale UniversityBlack Holes: The Membrane Paradigm (, New Haven, CT, 1986).
- T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044048 (2011).
- C. Eling, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2008) 048; G. Chirco and S. Liberati, Phys. Rev. D 81, 024016 (2010); C. Eling and Y. Oz, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2010) 069.
- Eric Gourgoulhon and Jose Luis Jaramillo, Phys. Rep. 423, 159 (2006).
- Sanved Kolekar and Dawood Kothawala, arXiv:1111.1242; Sanved Kolekar, Dawood Kothawala, and T. Padmanabhan, arXiv:1111.0973.
- Jonathan Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. D 65, 024020 (2001); F. Pretorius, D. Vollick, and W. Israel, 57, 6311 (1998).
- Geoffrey Compre, Paul McFadden, Kostas Skenderis, and Marika Taylor, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 050.
- Christopher Eling and Yaron Oz, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 007.