Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Cosmology using advanced gravitational-wave detectors alone

Stephen R. Taylor*

Jonathan R. Gair

Ilya Mandel

  • Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK

  • Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA, UK

  • NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellow, MIT Kavli Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA; and School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT

  • *staylor@ast.cam.ac.uk
  • jgair@ast.cam.ac.uk
  • imandel@star.sr.bham.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 85, 023535 – Published 30 January, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.023535

Abstract

We investigate a novel approach to measuring the Hubble constant using gravitational-wave (GW) signals from compact binaries by exploiting the narrowness of the distribution of masses of the underlying neutron-star population. Gravitational-wave observations with a network of detectors will permit a direct, independent measurement of the distance to the source systems. If the redshift of the source is known, these inspiraling double-neutron-star binary systems can be used as standard sirens to extract cosmological information. Unfortunately, the redshift and the system chirp mass are degenerate in GW observations. Thus, most previous work has assumed that the source redshift is obtained from electromagnetic counterparts. However, we investigate a novel method of using these systems as standard sirens with GW observations alone. In this paper, we explore what we can learn about the background cosmology and the mass distribution of neutron stars from the set of neutron-star (NS) mergers detected by such a network. We use a Bayesian formalism to analyze catalogs of NS-NS inspiral detections. We find that it is possible to constrain the Hubble constant, H0, and the parameters of the NS mass function using gravitational-wave data alone, without relying on electromagnetic counterparts. Under reasonable assumptions, we will be able to determine H0 to ±10% using 100 observations, provided the Gaussian half-width of the underlying double NS mass distribution is less than 0.04M. The expected precision depends linearly on the intrinsic width of the NS mass function, but has only a weak dependence on H0 near the default parameter values. Finally, we consider what happens if, for some fraction of our data catalog, we have an electromagnetically measured redshift. The detection, and cataloging, of these compact-object mergers will allow precision astronomy, and provide a determination of H0 which is independent of the local distance scale.

Article Text

References (68)

  1. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, R. Adhikari, P. Ajith, B. Allen, G. Allen, R. S. Amin, S. B. Anderson, W. G. Anderson, M. A. Arain et al., Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 076901 (2009).
  2. J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, M. Abernathy, T. Accadia, F. Acernese, C. Adams, R. Adhikari, P. Ajith, B. Allen et al., Phys. Rev. D 82, 102001 (2010).
  3. A. Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), 688–696 (1916).
  4. A. Einstein, Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), 154–167 (1918).
  5. H. Grote and (the LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 114043 (2008).
  6. F. Acernese, P. Amico, M. Alshourbagy, F. Antonucci, S. Aoudia, S. Avino, D. Babusci, G. Ballardin et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 23, S635 (2006).
  7. R. Takahashi and (the TAMA Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 21, S403 (2004).
  8. K. Kuroda and (LCGT Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084004 (2010).
  9. A. Abramovici, W. E. Althouse, R. W. P. Drever, Y. Gursel, S. Kawamura, F. J. Raab, D. Shoemaker, L. Sievers, R. E. Spero, and K. S. Thorne, Science 256, 325 (1992).
  10. I. Mandel and R. O’Shaughnessy, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 114007 (2010).
  11. G. M. Harry and (the LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084006 (2010).
  12. J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, M. Abernathy, T. Accadia, F. Acernese, C. Adams, R. Adhikari, P. Ajith, B. Allen et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 173001 (2010).
  13. Virgo, Technical Report No. VIR-0027A-09, Virgo, 2009.
  14. B. F. Schutz, Nature (London) 323, 310 (1986).
  15. S. A. Hughes and D. E. Holz, Classical Quantum Gravity 20, S65 (2003).
  16. D. E. Holz and S. A. Hughes, Astrophys. J. 629, 15 (2005).
  17. S. Nissanke, D. E. Holz, S. A. Hughes, N. Dalal, and J. L. Sievers, Astrophys. J. 725, 496 (2010).
  18. C. L. MacLeod and C. J. Hogan, Phys. Rev. D 77, 043512 (2008).
  19. C. Messenger and J. Read, arXiv:1107.5725.
  20. D. Marković, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4738 (1993).
  21. D. F. Chernoff and L. S. Finn , Astrophys. J. 411, L5 (1993).
  22. L. S. Finn, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2878 (1996).
  23. C. Cutler and E. E. Flanagan, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994).
  24. S. Fairhurst, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 105021 (2011).
  25. M. V. van der Sluys, C. Röver, A. Stroeer, V. Raymond, I. Mandel, N. Christensen, V. Kalogera, R. Meyer, and A. Vecchio, Astrophys. J. 688, L61 (2008).
  26. B. Aylott, B. Farr, V. Kalogera, I. Mandel, V. Raymond, C. Rodriguez, M. van der Sluys, A. Vecchio, and J. Veitch, arXiv:1106.2547.
  27. J. Abadie, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, M. Abernathy, C. Adams, R. Adhikari, P. Ajith, B. Allen, G. Allen, E. Amador Ceron et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 624, 223 (2010).
  28. S. M. Nissanke, J. L. Sievers, N. Dalal, and D. E. Holz, Astrophys. J. 739, 99 (2011).
  29. B. Abbott, R. Abbott, R. Adhikari, A. Ageev, B. Allen, R. Amin, S. B. Anderson, W. G. Anderson, M. Araya, H. Armandula et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 517, 154 (2004).
  30. R. O’Shaughnessy, V. Kalogera, and K. Belczynski, Astrophys. J. 716, 615 (2010).
  31. A. C. Searle, S. M. Scott, D. E. McClelland, and L. S. Finn, Phys. Rev. D 73, 124014 (2006).
  32. Advanced LIGO anticipated sensitivity curves, 2010, https://dcc.ligo.org/cgi-bin/DocDB/ShowDocument?docid=2974.
  33. Advanced Virgo Baseline Design, 2009, https://pub3.ego-gw.it/itf/tds/file.php?callFile=VIR-0027A-09.pdf.
  34. F. Beauville, M.-A. Bizouard, L. Blackburn, L. Bosi, L. Brocco, D. A. Brown, D. Buskulic, F. Cavalier, S. Chatterji, N. Christensen et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 045001 (2008).
  35. P. Nutzman, V. Kalogera, L. S. Finn, C. Hendrickson, and K. Belczynski, Astrophys. J. 612, 364 (2004).
  36. L. E. Kidder, C. M. Will, and A. G. Wiseman, Phys. Rev. D 47, 3281 (1993).
  37. L. S. Finn and D. F. Chernoff, Phys. Rev. D 47, 2198 (1993).
  38. B. Kiziltan, A. Kottas, and S. E. Thorsett, arXiv:1011.4291.
  39. R. Valentim, E. Rangel, and J. E. Horvath, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 414, 1427 (2011).
  40. K. Belczynski, V. Kalogera, F. A. Rasio, R. E. Taam, A. Zezas, T. Bulik, T. J. Maccarone, and N. Ivanova, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 174, 223 (2008).
  41. K. Belczynski (private communication).
  42. C. Cutler and J. Harms, Phys. Rev. D 73, 042001 (2006).
  43. R. Schneider, V. Ferrari, S. Matarrese, and S. F. Portegies Zwart, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 324, 797 (2001).
  44. V. Kalogera, C. Kim, D. R. Lorimer, M. Burgay, N. D’Amico, A. Possenti, R. N. Manchester, A. G. Lyne, B. C. Joshi, M. A. McLaughlin et al., Astrophys. J. 614, L137 (2004).
  45. C. Kim, V. Kalogera, and D. R. Lorimer, arXiv:astro-ph/0608280.
  46. V. Kalogera, R. Narayan, D. N. Spergel, and J. H. Taylor, Astrophys. J. 556, 340 (2001).
  47. R. K. Kopparapu, C. Hanna, V. Kalogera, R. O’Shaughnessy, G. González, P. R. Brady, and S. Fairhurst, Astrophys. J. 675, 1459 (2008).
  48. D. Larson, J. Dunkley, G. Hinshaw, E. Komatsu, M. R. Nolta, C. L. Bennett, B. Gold, M. Halpern, R. S. Hill et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 16 (2011).
  49. N. Jarosik, C. L. Bennett, J. Dunkley, B. Gold, M. R. Greason, M. Halpern, R. S. Hill, G. Hinshaw, A. Kogut, E. Komatsu et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 14 (2011).
  50. J. R. Gair, C. Tang, and M. Volonteri, Phys. Rev. D 81, 104014 (2010).
  51. R. O’Shaughnessy, C. Kim, V. Kalogera, and K. Belczynski, Astrophys. J. 672, 479 (2008).
  52. C. Kim, V. Kalogera, and D. R. Lorimer, Astrophys. J. 584, 985 (2003).
  53. A. Sesana, J. Gair, E. Berti, and M. Volonteri, Phys. Rev. D 83, 044036 (2011).
  54. I. Mandel, Phys. Rev. D 81, 084029 (2010).
  55. L. Rezzolla, B. Giacomazzo, L. Baiotti, J. Granot, C. Kouveliotou, and M. A. Aloy, Astrophys. J. 732, L6 (2011).
  56. K. Z. Stanek, P. M. Garnavich, J. Kaluzny, W. Pych, and I. Thompson, Astrophys. J. 522, L39 (1999).
  57. D. N. Burrows, D. Grupe, M. Capalbi, A. Panaitescu, S. K. Patel, C. Kouveliotou, B. Zhang, P. Mészáros, G. Chincarini, N. Gehrels et al., Astrophys. J. 653, 468 (2006).
  58. D. A. Frail, S. R. Kulkarni, R. Sari, S. G. Djorgovski, J. S. Bloom, T. J. Galama, D. E. Reichart, E. Berger, F. A. Harrison, P. A. Price et al., Astrophys. J. 562, L55 (2001).
  59. M. R. Metzger, S. G. Djorgovski, S. R. Kulkarni, C. C. Steidel, K. L. Adelberger, D. A. Frail, E. Costa, and F. Frontera, Nature (London) 387, 878 (1997).
  60. A. Dietz, Astron. Astrophys. 529, A97 (2011).
  61. E. Nakar, Phys. Rep. 442, 166 (2007).
  62. L. K. Nuttall and P. J. Sutton, Phys. Rev. D 82, 102002 (2010).
  63. W. Del Pozzo, arXiv:1108.1317.
  64. M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Beker et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  65. M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Beker et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 084007 (2010).
  66. B. S. Sathyaprakash, B. F. Schutz, and C. Van Den Broeck, Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 215006 (2010).
  67. W. Zhao, C. Van den Broeck, D. Baskaran, and T. G. F. Li, Phys. Rev. D 83, 023005 (2011).
  68. S. Hild, S. Chelkowski, and A. Freise, arXiv:0810.0604.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation