Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Featured in Physics
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Collinear and soft divergences in perturbative quantum gravity

Ratindranath Akhoury1,*, Ryo Saotome1,†, and George Sterman2,‡

  • 1Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics, Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1120, USA
  • 2C. N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, 11794-3840, USA

  • *akhoury@umich.edu
  • rsaotome@umich.edu
  • george.sterman@stonybrook.edu

Phys. Rev. D 84, 104040 – Published 23 November, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.104040

Abstract

Collinear and soft divergences in perturbative quantum gravity are investigated to arbitrary orders in amplitudes for wide-angle scattering, using methods developed for gauge theories. We show that collinear singularities cancel when all such divergent diagrams are summed over, by using the gravitational Ward identity that decouples unphysical polarizations from the S-matrix. This analysis generalizes a result previously demonstrated in the eikonal approximation. We also confirm that the only virtual graviton corrections that give soft logarithmic divergences are of the ladder and crossed ladder types.

Synopsis

Wrestling with Infinities

Published 23 November, 2011

Theorists show that mathematical divergences may not be a problem for the low-energy limit of certain effective theories of quantum gravity.

See more in Physics

Article Text

References (25)

  1. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 140, B516 (1965).
  2. J. F. Donoghue and T. Torma, Phys. Rev. D 60, 024003 (1999).
  3. S. G. Naculich and H. J. Schnitzer, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 087.
  4. C. D. White, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 060.
  5. Z. Bern, L. J. Dixon, and R. Roiban, Phys. Lett. B 644, 265 (2007).
  6. S. B. Giddings, arXiv:1105.6359.
  7. G. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 17, 2773 (1978).
  8. R. Akhoury, Phys. Rev. D 19, 1250 (1979); A. Sen, 28, 860 (1983).
  9. S. B. Libby and G. F. Sterman, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3252 (1978).
  10. G. F. Sterman, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1993), p. 572.
  11. R. P. Feynman, Acta Phys. Pol. 24, 697 (1963); B. S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967); 162, 1195 (1967); 162, 1239 (1967); L. D. Faddeev and V. N. Popov, Phys. Lett. 25B, 29 (1967).
  12. G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, A 20, 69 (1974); V. E. Korepin, arXiv:0905.2175.
  13. D. M. Capper, G. Leibbrandt, and M. Ramon Medrano, Phys. Rev. D 8, 4320 (1973).
  14. F. A. Berends and R. Gastmans, Nucl. Phys. B88, 99 (1975).
  15. J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3874 (1994).
  16. L. D. Landau, Nucl. Phys. 13, 181 (1959); J. D. Bjorken, Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1959.
  17. R. J. Eden, P. V. Landshooff, D. I. Olive, and J. C. Polkinghorne, The Analytic S-Matrix (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1966), p. 287.
  18. J. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011), p. 636.
  19. C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D 63, 114020 (2001).
  20. J. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. 111, 315 (1958).
  21. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 135, B1049 (1964).
  22. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Adv. Ser. Dir. High Energy Phys. 5, 1 (1988).
  23. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Nucl. Phys. B223, 381 (1983).
  24. P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2300 (1973).
  25. S. B. Giddings, M. Schmidt-Sommerfeld, and J. R. Andersen, Phys. Rev. D 82, 104022 (2010); P. Lodone and V. S. Rychkov, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2009) 036; H. J. Schnitzer, arXiv:hep-th/0701217.

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation