- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review D

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Isolated vortex and vortex lattice in a holographic p-wave superconductor

James M. Murray and Zlatko Tešanović

  • Institute for Quantum Matter and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA

PDF

Phys. Rev. D 83, 126011 – Published 23 June, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.126011

Abstract

Using the holographic gauge-gravity duality, we find a solution for an isolated vortex and a vortex lattice in a 2+1-dimensional p-wave superconductor, which is described by the boundary theory dual to an SU(2) gauge theory in 3+1-dimensional anti-de Sitter space. Both px+ipy and px−ipy components of the superconducting order parameter, as well as the effects of a magnetic field on these components, are considered. The isolated vortex solution is studied, and it is found that the two order parameter components have different amplitudes due to the time-reversal symmetry breaking. The vortex lattice for large magnetic fields is also studied, where it is argued that only one order parameter component will be nonzero sufficiently close to the upper critical field. The upper critical field exhibits a characteristic upward curvature, reflecting the effects of field-induced correlations captured by the holographic theory. The free energy is calculated perturbatively in this region of the phase diagram, and it is shown that the triangular vortex lattice is the thermodynamically preferred solution.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (23)

  1. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  2. E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  3. C. P. Herzog, P. K. Kovtun, and D. T. Son, Phys. Rev. D 79, 066002 (2009).
  4. S. A. Hartnoll, C. P. Herzog, and G. T. Horowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 031601 (2008).
  5. S. S. Gubser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 191601 (2008).
  6. M. M. Roberts and S. A. Hartnoll, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 035.
  7. S. S. Gubser and S. S. Pufu, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2008) 033.
  8. J. W. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. D 81, 106008 (2010).
  9. F. Benini, C. P. Herzog, R. Rahman, and A. Yarom, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2010) 137.
  10. S. A. Hartnoll, Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 224002 (2009); C. P. Herzog, J. Phys. A 42, 343001 (2009); G. T. Horowitz, arXiv:1002.1722.
  11. M. Montull, A. Pomarol, and P. J. Silva, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 091601 (2009).
  12. T. Albash and C. V. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D 80, 126009 (2009).
  13. O. Doménech et al., J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 033.
  14. K. Maeda, M. Natsuume, and T. Okamura, Phys. Rev. D 81, 026002 (2010).
  15. H. B. Zeng, Z. Y. Fan, and H. S. Zong, Phys. Rev. D 82, 126008 (2010).
  16. R. Heeb and D. F. Agterberg, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7076 (1999).
  17. See http://www.comsol.com.

  18. The penetration depth is defined here simply as the characteristic decay length of the magnetic field away from the vortex core. It cannot be defined via a London equation in the boundary theory because our boundary condition ∂zAϕ=0 leads to zero current in the boundary theory.

  19. S. K. Sundaram and R. Joynt, Phys. Rev. B 40, 8780 (1989).
  20. A. A. Abrikosov, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1174 (1957).
  21. X. H. Ge, B. Wang, S. F. Wu, and G. H. Yang, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 108.
  22. P. G. de Gennes, Superconductivity in Metals and Alloys (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1989).
  23. T. Hartman and S. A. Hartnoll, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2010) 005.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 83, 126011– Published 23 June, 2011
  • Received 30 March 2011
Article part of CHORUS

© 2011 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation