Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Higgs mechanism with type-II Nambu-Goldstone bosons at finite chemical potential

Yusuke Hama1, Tetsuo Hatsuda1,2,3, and Shun Uchino4

  • 1Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • 2IPMU, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8568, Japan
  • 3Theoretical Research Division, Nishina Center, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan
  • 4Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

Phys. Rev. D 83, 125009 – Published 2 June, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.125009

Abstract

When the spontaneous symmetry breaking occurs for systems without Lorentz covariance, there arises possible mismatch, NNG<NBG, between numbers of Nambu-Goldstone (NG) bosons (NNG) and the numbers of broken generators (NBG). In such a situation, so-called type-II NG bosons emerge. We study how the gauge bosons acquire masses through the Higgs mechanism under this mismatch by employing gauge theories with complex scalar field at finite chemical potential and by enforcing “charge” neutrality. To separate the physical spectra from unphysical ones, the Rξ gauge is adopted. Not only massless NG bosons but also massive scalar bosons generated by the chemical potential are absorbed into spatial components of the gauge bosons. Although the chemical potential induces a nontrivial mixings among the scalar bosons and temporal components of the gauge bosons, it does not affect the structure of the physical spectra, so that the total number of physical modes is not modified even for NNG<NBG.

Article Text

References (12)

  1. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961); 124, 246 (1961).
  2. J. Goldstone, Nuovo Cimento 19, 154 (1961).
  3. J. Goldstone, A. Salam, and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 127, 965 (1962).
  4. Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 117, 648 (1960); P. W. Anderson, 130, 439 (1963); F. Englert and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964); P. W. Higgs, Phys. Lett. 12, 132 (1964); 13, 508 (1964); G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen, and T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1964).
  5. C. Kittel, Quantum Theory of Solids (Wiley, New York, 1987), 2nd. ed.; H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rev. D 49, 3033 (1994).
  6. H. B. Nielsen and S. Chadha, Nucl. Phys. B105, 445 (1976).
  7. V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 111601 (2002); T. Schäfer, D. T. Son, M. A. Stephanov, D. Toublan, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Lett. B 522, 67 (2001).
  8. D. Blaschke, D. Ebert, K. G. Klimenko, M. K. Volkov, V. L. Yudichevand , Phys. Rev. D 70, 014006 (2004).
  9. T. Brauner, Symmetry 2, 609 (2010).
  10. J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D 24, 426 (1981).
  11. V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Lett. B 581, 82 (2004).
  12. K. Iida and G. Baym, Phys. Rev. D 66, 014015 (2002); I. Giannakis and H.-c. Ren, 65, 054017 (2002); M. Eto, M. Nitta, and N. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 161601 (2010).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation